summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-09-12tests: remove leftover untracked filesElijah Newren
Remove untracked files that are unwanted after they are done being used. While the set of cases in this patch is certainly far from comprehensive, it was motivated by some work to see what the fallout would be if we were to make the removal of untracked files as a side effect of other commands into an error. Some cases were a bit more involved than the testcase changes included in this patch, but the ones included here represent the simple cases. While this patch is not that important since we are not changing the behavior of those other commands into an error in the near term, I thought these changes were useful anyway as an explicit documentation of the intent that these untracked files are no longer useful. Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-08-23rebase -i: add another reword testPhillip Wood
None of the existing reword tests check that there are no uncommitted changes when the editor is opened. Reuse the editor script from the last commit to fix this omission. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-26Merge branch 'ab/detox-gettext-tests'Junio C Hamano
Removal of GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON continues. * ab/detox-gettext-tests: tests: remove most uses of test_i18ncmp tests: remove last uses of C_LOCALE_OUTPUT tests: remove most uses of C_LOCALE_OUTPUT tests: remove last uses of GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON=false
2021-02-12test-lib-functions: remove bug-inducing "diagnostics" helper paramÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Remove the optional "diagnostics" parameter of the test_path_is_{file,dir,missing} functions. We have a lot of uses of these functions, but the only legitimate use of the diagnostics parameter is from when the functions themselves were introduced in 2caf20c52b7 (test-lib: user-friendly alternatives to test [-d|-f|-e], 2010-08-10). But as the the rest of this diff demonstrates its presence did more to silently introduce bugs in our tests. Fix such bugs in the tests added in ae4e89e549b (gc: add --keep-largest-pack option, 2018-04-15), and c04ba51739a (t6046: testcases checking whether updates can be skipped in a merge, 2018-04-19). Let's also assert that those functions are called with exactly one parameter, a follow-up commit will add similar asserts to other functions in test-lib-functions.sh that we didn't have existing misuse of. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-11tests: remove most uses of test_i18ncmpÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
As a follow-up to d162b25f956 (tests: remove support for GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON, 2021-01-20) remove most uses of test_i18ncmp via a simple s/test_i18ncmp/test_cmp/g search-replacement. I'm leaving t6300-for-each-ref.sh out due to a conflict with in-flight changes between "master" and "seen", as well as the prerequisite itself due to other changes between "master" and "next/seen" which add new test_i18ncmp uses. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-11tests: remove most uses of C_LOCALE_OUTPUTÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
As a follow-up to d162b25f956 (tests: remove support for GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON, 2021-01-20) remove those uses of the now always true C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prerequisite from those tests which declare it as an argument to test_expect_{success,failure}. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-25Merge branch 'js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch'Junio C Hamano
Prepare tests not to be affected by the name of the default branch "git init" creates. * js/default-branch-name-tests-final-stretch: (28 commits) tests: drop prereq `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` where no longer needed t99*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" tests(git-p4): transition to the default branch name `main` t9[5-7]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t9[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t8*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t7[5-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t7[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t6[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t64*: preemptively adjust alignment to prepare for `master` -> `main` t6[0-3]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t5[6-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t55[4-9]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t55[23]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t551*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t550*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t5503: prepare aligned comment for replacing `master` with `main` t5[0-4]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" t5323: prepare centered comment for `master` -> `main` t4*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main" ...
2020-11-24t3404: do not depend on any specific default branch nameJohannes Schindelin
Now that we can override the default branch name in the tests via `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME`, we should avoid expecting a particular hard-coded name. So let's rename the initial branch immediately to `primary` and work with that. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Johannes Schindelin
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-04rebase -i: stop overwriting ORIG_HEAD bufferPhillip Wood
After rebasing, ORIG_HEAD is supposed to point to the old HEAD of the rebased branch. The code used find_unique_abbrev() to obtain the object name of the old HEAD and wrote to both .git/rebase-merge/orig-head (used by `rebase --abort` to go back to the previous state) and to ORIG_HEAD. The buffer find_unique_abbrev() gives back is volatile, unfortunately, and was overwritten after the former file is written but before ORIG_FILE is written, leaving an incorrect object name in it. Avoid relying on the volatile buffer of find_unique_abbrev(), and instead supply our own buffer to keep the object name. I think that all of the users of head_hash should actually be using opts->orig_head instead as passing a string rather than a struct object_id around is a hang over from the scripted implementation. This patch just fixes the immediate bug and adds a regression test based on Caspar's reproduction example[1]. The users will be converted to use struct object_id and head_hash removed in the next few commits. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAFzd1+7PDg2PZgKw7U0kdepdYuoML9wSN4kofmB_-8NHrbbrHg@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: Caspar Duregger <herr.kaste@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-19Merge branch 'ak/sequencer-fix-find-uniq-abbrev'Junio C Hamano
Ring buffer with size 4 used for bin-hex translation resulted in a wrong object name in the sequencer's todo output, which has been corrected. * ak/sequencer-fix-find-uniq-abbrev: rebase -i: fix possibly wrong onto hash in todo
2020-08-19Merge branch 'en/sequencer-merge-labels'Junio C Hamano
The commit labels used to explain each side of conflicted hunks placed by the sequencer machinery have been made more readable by humans. * en/sequencer-merge-labels: sequencer: avoid garbled merge machinery messages due to commit labels
2020-08-14sequencer: avoid garbled merge machinery messages due to commit labelsElijah Newren
sequencer's get_message() exists to provide good labels on conflict hunks; see commits d68565402a ("revert: clarify label on conflict hunks", 2010-03-20) bf975d379d ("cherry-pick, revert: add a label for ancestor", 2010-03-20) 043a4492b3 ("sequencer: factor code out of revert builtin", 2012-01-11). for background on this function. These labels are of the form <commitID>... <commit summary> or parent of <commitID>... <commit summary> These labels are then passed as branch names to the merge machinery. However, these labels, as formatted, often also serve to confuse. For example, if we have a rename involved in a content merge, then it results in text such as the following: <<<<<<<< HEAD:foo.c int j; ======== int counter; >>>>>>>> b01dface... Removed unnecessary stuff:bar.c Or in various conflict messages, it can make it very difficult to read: CONFLICT (rename/delete): foo.c deleted in b01dface... Removed unnecessary stuff and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of foo.c left in tree. CONFLICT (file location): dir1/foo.c added in b01dface... Removed unnecessary stuff inside a directory that was renamed in HEAD, suggesting it should perhaps be moved to dir2/foo.c. Make a minor change to remove the ellipses and add parentheses around the commit summary; this makes all three examples much easier to read: <<<<<<<< HEAD:foo.c int j; ======== int counter; >>>>>>>> b01dface (Removed unnecessary stuff):bar.c CONFLICT (rename/delete): foo.c deleted in b01dface (Removed unnecessary stuff) and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of foo.c left in tree. CONFLICT (file location): dir1/foo.c added in b01dface (Removed unnecessary stuff) inside a directory that was renamed in HEAD, suggesting it should perhaps be moved to dir2/foo.c. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-08-13rebase -i: fix possibly wrong onto hash in todoAntti Keränen
'todo_list_write_to_file' may overwrite the static buffer, originating from 'find_unique_abbrev', that was used to store the short commit hash 'c' for "# Rebase a..b onto c" message in the todo editor. This is because the buffer that is returned from 'find_unique_abbrev' is valid until 4 more calls to `find_unique_abbrev` are made. As 'todo_list_write_to_file' calls 'find_unique_abbrev' for each rebased commit, the hash for 'c' is overwritten if there are 4 or more commits in the rebase. This behavior has been broken since its introduction. Fix by storing the short onto commit hash in a different buffer that remains valid, before calling 'todo_list_write_to_file'. Found-by: Jussi Keränen <jussike@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Antti Keränen <detegr@rbx.email> Acked-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-30t3404: prepare 'short SHA-1 collision' tests for SHA-256Johannes Schindelin
The idea of the magic value "ac4f2ee" in this test is to make the reworded commit `collide2` have the same shortened ID as the commit `collide3`. To port the same idea to the SHA-256 version of Git, we therefore need another magic value that causes the same collision, but this time with the SHA-256 version of the commit IDs. In this patch, we add code guarded by `GIT_TEST_FIND_COLLIDER` to do exactly that. Essentially, a large number of integers is appended to the commit message "collide2" to find such a collision. To make it easier to find such a collision, we reduce the number of digits to 4. As the tests are no longer dependent on SHA-1, we also rename their titles to talk about "commit IDs" instead of "SHA-1s". Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-25Merge branch 'pw/advise-rebase-skip'Junio C Hamano
The mechanism to prevent "git commit" from making an empty commit or amending during an interrupted cherry-pick was broken during the rewrite of "git rebase" in C, which has been corrected. * pw/advise-rebase-skip: commit: give correct advice for empty commit during a rebase commit: encapsulate determine_whence() for sequencer commit: use enum value for multiple cherry-picks sequencer: write CHERRY_PICK_HEAD for reword and edit cherry-pick: check commit error messages cherry-pick: add test for `--skip` advice in `git commit` t3404: use test_cmp_rev
2020-03-02Merge branch 'en/rebase-backend'Junio C Hamano
"git rebase" has learned to use the merge backend (i.e. the machinery that drives "rebase -i") by default, while allowing "--apply" option to use the "apply" backend (e.g. the moral equivalent of "format-patch piped to am"). The rebase.backend configuration variable can be set to customize. * en/rebase-backend: rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends rebase: change the default backend from "am" to "merge" rebase: make the backend configurable via config setting rebase tests: repeat some tests using the merge backend instead of am rebase tests: mark tests specific to the am-backend with --am rebase: drop '-i' from the reflog for interactive-based rebases git-prompt: change the prompt for interactive-based rebases rebase: add an --am option rebase: move incompatibility checks between backend options a bit earlier git-rebase.txt: add more details about behavioral differences of backends rebase: allow more types of rebases to fast-forward t3432: make these tests work with either am or merge backends rebase: fix handling of restrict_revision rebase: make sure to pass along the quiet flag to the sequencer rebase, sequencer: remove the broken GIT_QUIET handling t3406: simplify an already simple test rebase (interactive-backend): fix handling of commits that become empty rebase (interactive-backend): make --keep-empty the default t3404: directly test the behavior of interest git-rebase.txt: update description of --allow-empty-message
2020-02-16rebase: rename the two primary rebase backendsElijah Newren
Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-16rebase tests: mark tests specific to the am-backend with --amElijah Newren
We have many rebase tests in the testsuite, and often the same test is repeated multiple times just testing different backends. For those tests that were specifically trying to test the am backend, add the --am flag. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-16rebase: drop '-i' from the reflog for interactive-based rebasesElijah Newren
A large variety of rebase types are supported by the interactive machinery, not just the explicitly interactive ones. These all share the same code and write the same reflog messages, but the "-i" moniker in those messages doesn't really have much meaning. It also becomes somewhat distracting once we switch the default from the am-backend to the interactive one. Just remove the "-i" from these messages. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-28rebase-interactive: warn if commit is dropped with `rebase --edit-todo'Alban Gruin
When set to "warn" or "error", `rebase.missingCommitsCheck' would make `rebase -i' warn if the user removed commits from the todo list to prevent mistakes. Unfortunately, `rebase --edit-todo' and `rebase --continue' don't take it into account. This adds the ability for `rebase --edit-todo' and `rebase --continue' to check if commits were dropped by the user. As both edit_todo_list() and complete_action() parse the todo list and check for dropped commits, the code doing so in the latter is removed to reduce duplication. `edit_todo_list_advice' is removed from sequencer.c as it is no longer used there. This changes when a backup of the todo list is made. Until now, it was saved only once, before the initial edit. Now, it is also made if the original todo list has no errors or no dropped commits. Thus, the backup should be error-free. Without this, sequencer_continue() (`rebase --continue') could only compare the current todo list against the original, unedited list. Before this change, this file was only used by edit_todo_list() and `rebase -p' to create the backup before the initial edit, and check_todo_list_from_file(), only used by `rebase -p' to check for dropped commits after its own initial edit. If the edited list has an error, a file, `dropped', is created to report the issue. Otherwise, it is deleted. Usually, the edited list is compared against the list before editing, but if this file exists, it will be compared to the backup. Also, if the file exists, sequencer_continue() checks the list for dropped commits. If the check was performed every time, it would fail when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict, as the backup will contain commits that were picked, but they will not be in the new list. It's safe to ignore this check if `dropped' does not exist, because that means that no errors were found at the last edition, so any missing commits here have already been picked. Five tests are added to t3404. The tests for `rebase.missingCommitsCheck = warn' and `rebase.missingCommitsCheck = error' have a similar structure. First, we start a rebase with an incorrect command on the first line. Then, we edit the todo list, removing the first and the last lines. This demonstrates that `--edit-todo' notices dropped commits, but not when the command is incorrect. Then, we restore the original todo list, and edit it to remove the last line. This demonstrates that if we add a commit after the initial edit, then remove it, `--edit-todo' will notice that it has been dropped. Then, the actual rebase takes place. In the third test, it is also checked that `--continue' will refuse to resume the rebase if commits were dropped. The fourth test checks that no errors are raised when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict, the fifth checks that no errors are raised when editing the todo list after pausing the rebase. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-23rebase -i: also avoid SHA-1 collisions with missingCommitsCheckJohannes Schindelin
When `rebase.missingCommitsCheck` is in effect, we use the backup of the todo list that was copied just before the user was allowed to edit it. That backup is, of course, just as susceptible to the hash collision as the todo list itself: a reworded commit could make a previously unambiguous short commit ID ambiguous all of a sudden. So let's not just copy the todo list, but let's instead write out the backup with expanded commit IDs. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-23rebase -i: re-fix short SHA-1 collisionJohannes Schindelin
In 66ae9a57b88 (t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate short SHA-1 collision, 2013-08-23), we added a test case that demonstrated how it is possible that a previously unambiguous short commit ID could become ambiguous *during* a rebase. In 75c69766554 (rebase -i: fix short SHA-1 collision, 2013-08-23), we fixed that problem simply by writing out the todo list with expanded commit IDs (except *right* before letting the user edit the todo list, in which case we shorten them, but we expand them right after the file was edited). However, the bug resurfaced as a side effect of 393adf7a6f6 (sequencer: directly call pick_commits() from complete_action(), 2019-11-24): as of this commit, the sequencer no longer re-reads the todo list after writing it out with expanded commit IDs. The only redeeming factor is that the todo list is already parsed at that stage, including all the commits corresponding to the commands, therefore the sequencer can continue even if the internal todo list has short commit IDs. That does not prevent problems, though: the sequencer writes out the `done` and `git-rebase-todo` files incrementally (i.e. overwriting the todo list with a version that has _short_ commit IDs), and if a merge conflict happens, or if an `edit` or a `break` command is encountered, a subsequent `git rebase --continue` _will_ re-read the todo list, opening an opportunity for the "short SHA-1 collision" bug again. To avoid that, let's make sure that we do expand the commit IDs in the todo list as soon as we have parsed it after letting the user edit it. Additionally, we improve the 'short SHA-1 collide' test case in t3404 to test specifically for the case where the rebase is resumed. We also hard-code the expected colliding short SHA-1s, to document the expectation (and to make it easier on future readers). Note that we specifically test that the short commit ID is used in the `git-rebase-todo.tmp` file: this file is created by the fake editor in the test script and reflects the state that would have been presented to the user to edit. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-17t3404: directly test the behavior of interestElijah Newren
t3404.3 is a simple test added by commit d078c3910689 ("t3404: todo list with commented-out commands only aborts", 2018-08-10) which was designed to test a todo list that only contained commented-out commands. There were two problems with this test: (1) its title did not reflect the purpose of the test, and (2) it tested the desired behavior through a side-effect of other functionality instead of directly testing the desired behavior discussed in the commit message. Modify the test to directly test the desired behavior and update the test title. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-09t3404: fix indentationJohannes Schindelin
This test case was added in 66ae9a57b88 (t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate short SHA-1 collision, 2013-08-23), and it is not indented in the way we usually indent sub-shell code in our test cases these days. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-06commit: give correct advice for empty commit during a rebasePhillip Wood
In dcb500dc16c (cherry-pick/revert: advise using --skip, 2019-07-02), `git commit` learned to suggest to run `git cherry-pick --skip` when trying to cherry-pick an empty patch. However, it was overlooked that there are more conditions than just a `git cherry-pick` when this advice is printed (which originally suggested the neutral `git reset`): the same can happen during a rebase. Let's suggest the correct command, even during a rebase. While at it, we adjust more places in `builtin/commit.c` that incorrectly assumed that the presence of a `CHERRY_PICK_HEAD` meant that surely this must be a `cherry-pick` in progress. Note: we take pains to handle the situation when a user runs a `git cherry-pick` _during_ a rebase. This is quite valid (e.g. in an `exec` line in an interactive rebase). On the other hand, it is not possible to run a rebase during a cherry-pick, meaning: if both `rebase-merge/` and `sequencer/` exist or CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and REBASE_HEAD point to the same commit , we still want to advise to use `git cherry-pick --skip`. Original-patch-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-06t3404: use test_cmp_revPhillip Wood
There are a number of places where we compare two revisions with test $(git rev-parse rev1) = $(git rev-parse rev2) when these fail there's no indication what has gone wrong and you need to be running with `-x` to see where the test has failed. Lets use test_cmp_rev instead. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-10Merge branch 'pw/post-commit-from-sequencer'Junio C Hamano
"rebase -i" ceased to run post-commit hook by mistake in an earlier update, which has been corrected. * pw/post-commit-from-sequencer: sequencer: run post-commit hook move run_commit_hook() to libgit and use it there sequencer.h fix placement of #endif t3404: remove uneeded calls to set_fake_editor t3404: set $EDITOR in subshell t3404: remove unnecessary subshell
2019-10-16sequencer: run post-commit hookPhillip Wood
Prior to commit 356ee4659b ("sequencer: try to commit without forking 'git commit'", 2017-11-24) the sequencer would always run the post-commit hook after each pick or revert as it forked `git commit` to create the commit. The conversion to committing without forking `git commit` omitted to call the post-commit hook after creating the commit. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-16t3404: remove uneeded calls to set_fake_editorPhillip Wood
Some tests were calling set_fake_editor to ensure they had a sane no-op editor set. Now that all the editor setting is done in subshells these tests can rely on EDITOR=: and so do not need to call set_fake_editor. Also add a test at the end to detect any future additions messing with the exported value of $EDITOR. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-16t3404: set $EDITOR in subshellPhillip Wood
As $EDITOR is exported setting it in one test affects all subsequent tests. Avoid this by always setting it in a subshell. This commit leaves 20 calls to set_fake_editor that are not in subshells as they can safely be removed in the next commit once all the other editor setting is done inside subshells. I have moved the call to set_fake_editor in some tests so it comes immediately before the call to 'git rebase' to avoid moving unrelated commands into the subshell. In one case ('rebase -ix with --autosquash') the call to set_fake_editor is moved past an invocation of 'git rebase'. This is safe as that invocation of 'git rebase' requires EDITOR=: or EDITOR=fake-editor.sh without FAKE_LINES being set which will be the case as the preceding tests either set their editor in a subshell or call set_fake_editor without setting FAKE_LINES. In a one test ('auto-amend only edited commits after "edit"') a call to test_tick are now in a subshell. I think this is OK as it is there to set the date for the next commit which is executed in the same subshell rather than updating GIT_COMMITTER_DATE for later tests (the next test calls test_tick before doing anything else). Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-16t3404: remove unnecessary subshellPhillip Wood
Neither of the commands executed in the subshell change any shell variables or the current directory so there is no need for them to be executed in a subshell. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-10-11Merge branch 'pw/rebase-i-show-HEAD-to-reword'Junio C Hamano
"git rebase -i" showed a wrong HEAD while "reword" open the editor. * pw/rebase-i-show-HEAD-to-reword: sequencer: simplify root commit creation rebase -i: check for updated todo after squash and reword rebase -i: always update HEAD before rewording
2019-09-30Merge branch 'dl/rebase-i-keep-base'Junio C Hamano
"git rebase --keep-base <upstream>" tries to find the original base of the topic being rebased and rebase on top of that same base, which is useful when running the "git rebase -i" (and its limited variant "git rebase -x"). The command also has learned to fast-forward in more cases where it can instead of replaying to recreate identical commits. * dl/rebase-i-keep-base: rebase: teach rebase --keep-base rebase tests: test linear branch topology rebase: fast-forward --fork-point in more cases rebase: fast-forward --onto in more cases rebase: refactor can_fast_forward into goto tower t3432: test for --no-ff's interaction with fast-forward t3432: distinguish "noop-same" v.s. "work-same" in "same head" tests t3432: test rebase fast-forward behavior t3431: add rebase --fork-point tests
2019-09-30Merge branch 'dl/use-sq-from-test-lib'Junio C Hamano
Code cleanup. * dl/use-sq-from-test-lib: t: use common $SQ variable
2019-09-30Merge branch 'bc/hash-independent-tests-part-5'Junio C Hamano
Preparation for SHA-256 upgrade continues in the test department. * bc/hash-independent-tests-part-5: t4009: make hash size independent t4002: make hash independent t4000: make hash size independent t3903: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants t3800: make hash-size independent t3600: make hash size independent t3506: make hash independent t3430: avoid hard-coded object IDs t3404: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants t3306: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants t3305: make hash size independent t3301: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants t3206: abstract away hash size constants t3201: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
2019-09-06t: use common $SQ variableDenton Liu
In many test scripts, there are bespoke definitions of the single quote that are some variation of this: SQ="'" Define a common $SQ variable in test-lib.sh and replace all usages of these bespoke variables with the common one. This change was done by running `git grep =\"\'\" t/` and `git grep =\\\\\'` and manually changing the resulting definitions and corresponding usages. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-05t: use LF variable defined in the test harnessJunio C Hamano
A few test scripts assign a single LF to $LF, but that is already given by test-lib.sh to everybody. Remove the unnecessary reassignment. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-27rebase: fast-forward --onto in more casesDenton Liu
Before, when we had the following graph, A---B---C (master) \ D (side) running 'git rebase --onto master... master side' would result in D being always rebased, no matter what. However, the desired behavior is that rebase should notice that this is fast-forwardable and do that instead. Add detection to `can_fast_forward` so that this case can be detected and a fast-forward will be performed. First of all, rewrite the function to use gotos which simplifies the logic. Next, since the options.upstream && !oidcmp(&options.upstream->object.oid, &options.onto->object.oid) conditions were removed in `cmd_rebase`, we reintroduce a substitute in `can_fast_forward`. In particular, checking the merge bases of `upstream` and `head` fixes a failing case in t3416. The abbreviated graph for t3416 is as follows: F---G topic / A---B---C---D---E master and the failing command was git rebase --onto master...topic F topic Before, Git would see that there was one merge base (C), and the merge and onto were the same so it would incorrectly return 1, indicating that we could fast-forward. This would cause the rebased graph to be 'ABCFG' when we were expecting 'ABCG'. With the additional logic, we detect that upstream and head's merge base is F. Since onto isn't F, it means we're not rebasing the full set of commits from master..topic. Since we're excluding some commits, a fast-forward cannot be performed and so we correctly return 0. Add '-f' to test cases that failed as a result of this change because they were not expecting a fast-forward so that a rebase is forced. Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-20t3404: abstract away SHA-1-specific constantsbrian m. carlson
Adjust the test so that it computes variables for object IDs instead of using hard-coded hashes. Add a use of $EMPTY_TREE instead of a hard-coded value. Remove a comment about hard-coded hashes which is no longer applicable. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-19rebase -i: always update HEAD before rewordingPhillip Wood
If the user runs git log while rewording a commit it is confusing if sometimes we're amending the commit that's being reworded and at other times we're creating a new commit depending on whether we could fast-forward or not[1]. Fix this inconsistency by always committing the picked commit and then running 'git commit --amend' to do the reword. The first commit is performed by the sequencer without forking git commit and does not impact on the speed of rebase. In a test rewording 100 commits with GIT_EDITOR=true GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR='sed -i s/pick/reword/' \ ../bin-wrappers/git rebase -i --root and taking the best of three runs the current master took 957ms and with this patch it took 961ms. This change fixes rewording the new root commit when rearranging commits with --root. Note that the new code no longer updates CHERRY_PICK_HEAD after creating a root commit - I'm not sure why the old code was that creating that ref after a successful commit, everywhere else it is removed after a successful commit. [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqlfvu4be3.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/T/#m133009cb91cf0917bcf667300f061178be56680a Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-29Merge branch 'sg/rebase-progress' into maintJunio C Hamano
Use "Erase in Line" CSI sequence that is already used in the editor support to clear cruft in the progress output. * sg/rebase-progress: progress: use term_clear_line() rebase: fix garbled progress display with '-x' pager: add a helper function to clear the last line in the terminal t3404: make the 'rebase.missingCommitsCheck=ignore' test more focused t3404: modernize here doc style
2019-07-29Merge branch 'js/t3404-typofix' into maintJunio C Hamano
Typofix. * js/t3404-typofix: t3404: fix a typo
2019-07-09Merge branch 'sg/rebase-progress'Junio C Hamano
Use "Erase in Line" CSI sequence that is already used in the editor support to clear cruft in the progress output. * sg/rebase-progress: progress: use term_clear_line() rebase: fix garbled progress display with '-x' pager: add a helper function to clear the last line in the terminal t3404: make the 'rebase.missingCommitsCheck=ignore' test more focused t3404: modernize here doc style
2019-07-09Merge branch 'js/t3404-typofix'Junio C Hamano
Typofix. * js/t3404-typofix: t3404: fix a typo
2019-06-24t3404: make the 'rebase.missingCommitsCheck=ignore' test more focusedSZEDER Gábor
The test 'rebase -i respects rebase.missingCommitsCheck = warn' is mainly interested in the warning about the dropped commits, but it checks the whole output of 'git rebase', including progress lines and what not that are not at all relevant to 'rebase.missingCommitsCheck', but make it necessary to update this test whenever e.g. the way we show progress is updated (as it will happen in one of the later patches of this series). Modify the test to verify only the first four lines of 'git rebase's output that contain all the important lines, notably the line containing the "Warning:" itself and the oneline log of the dropped commit. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-24t3404: modernize here doc styleSZEDER Gábor
In 't3404-rebase-interactive.sh' the expected output of several tests is prepared from here documents, which are outside of 'test_expect_success' blocks and have spaces around redirection operators. Move these here documents into the corresponding 'test_expect_success' block and avoid spaces between filename and redition operators. Furthermore, quote the here docs' delimiter word to prevent parameter expansions and what not, where applicable. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-14t3404: fix a typoJohannes Schindelin
This one slipped through the review of a9279c678588 (sequencer: do not squash 'reword' commits when we hit conflicts, 2018-06-19). Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-20rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin settingÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting, which was added as an escape hatch to disable the builtin version of rebase first released with Git 2.20. See [1] for the initial implementation of rebase.useBuiltin, and [2] and [3] for the documentation and corresponding GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN option. Carrying the legacy version is a maintenance burden as seen in 7e097e27d3 ("legacy-rebase: backport -C<n> and --whitespace=<option> checks", 2018-11-20) and 9aea5e9286 ("rebase: fix regression in rebase.useBuiltin=false test mode", 2019-02-13). Since the built-in version has been shown to be stable enough let's remove the legacy version. As noted in [3] having use_builtin_rebase() shell out to get its config doesn't make any sense anymore, that was done for the purposes of spawning the legacy rebase without having modified any global state. Let's instead handle this case in rebase_config(). There's still a bunch of references to git-legacy-rebase in po/*.po, but those will be dealt with in time by the i18n effort. Even though this configuration variable only existed two releases let's not entirely delete the entry from the docs, but note its absence. Individual versions of git tend to be around for a while due to distro packaging timelines, so e.g. if we're "lucky" a given version like 2.21 might be installed on say OSX for half a decade. That'll mean some people probably setting this in config, and then when they later wonder if it's needed they can Google search the config option name or check it in git-config. It also allows us to refer to the docs from the warning for details. 1. 55071ea248 ("rebase: start implementing it as a builtin", 2018-08-07) 2. d8d0a546f0 ("rebase doc: document rebase.useBuiltin", 2018-11-14) 3. 62c23938fa ("tests: add a special setup where rebase.useBuiltin is off", 2018-11-14) 3. https://public-inbox.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1903141544110.41@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet/ Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-02-13rebase: fix regression in rebase.useBuiltin=false test modeÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Fix a recently introduced regression in c762aada1a ("rebase -x: sanity check command", 2019-01-29) triggered when running the tests with GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN=false. See 62c23938fa ("tests: add a special setup where rebase.useBuiltin is off", 2018-11-14) for how that test mode works. As discussed on-list[1] it's not worth it to implement the sanity check in the legacy rebase code, we plan to remove it after the 2.21 release. So let's do the bare minimum to make the tests pass under the GIT_TEST_REBASE_USE_BUILTIN=false special setup. 1. https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqva1nbeno.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/ Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>