summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-09-30Merge branch 'aw/rebase-i-edit-todo'Junio C Hamano
Teach an option to edit the insn sheet to "git rebase -i". * aw/rebase-i-edit-todo: rebase -i: suggest using --edit-todo to fix an unknown instruction rebase -i: Add tests for "--edit-todo" rebase -i: Teach "--edit-todo" action rebase -i: Refactor help messages for todo file rebase usage: subcommands can not be combined with -i
2012-09-18rebase -i: fix misleading error message after 'exec no-such' instructionJohannes Sixt
When the todo sheet of interactive rebase instructs to run a non-existing command, the operation stops with the following error: Execution failed: no-such You can fix the problem, and then run git rebase --continue fatal: 'rebase' appears to be a git command, but we were not able to execute it. Maybe git-rebase is broken? The reason is that the shell that attempted to run the command exits with code 127. rebase--interactive just forwards this code to the caller (the git wrapper). But our smart run-command infrastructure detects this special exit code and turns it into ENOENT, which in turn is interpreted by the git wrapper as if the external command that it just executed did not exist. This is finally translated to the misleading last two lines in error message cited above. Fix it by translating the error code before it is forwarded. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-18rebase -i: Add tests for "--edit-todo"Andrew Wong
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-31Merge branch 'jx/i18n-1.7.11'Junio C Hamano
Add i18n support for scripted Porcelains, and mark strings in merge(-recursive), am, and rebase for i18n. * jx/i18n-1.7.11: i18n: merge-recursive: mark strings for translation Remove dead code which contains bad gettext block i18n: am: mark more strings for translation rebase: remove obsolete and unused LONG_USAGE which breaks xgettext i18n: Rewrite gettext messages start with dash i18n: rebase: mark messages for translation i18n: New keywords for xgettext extraction from sh
2012-07-27i18n: Rewrite gettext messages start with dashJiang Xin
Gettext message in a shell script should not start with '-', one workaround is adding '--' between gettext and the message, like: gettext -- "--exec option ..." But due to a bug in the xgettext extraction, xgettext can not extract the actual message for this case. Rewriting the message is a simpler and better solution. Reported-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-25Merge branch 'cw/rebase-i-root'Junio C Hamano
Finishing touches to the "rebase -i --root" (new feature for 1.7.12). * cw/rebase-i-root: rebase -i: handle fixup of root commit correctly
2012-07-24rebase -i: handle fixup of root commit correctlyChris Webb
There is a bug with git rebase -i --root when a fixup or squash line is applied to the new root. We attempt to amend the commit onto which they apply with git reset --soft HEAD^ followed by a normal commit. Unlike a real commit --amend, this sequence will fail against a root commit as it has no parent. Fix rebase -i to use commit --amend for fixup and squash instead, and add a test for the case of a fixup of the root commit. Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-16Merge branch 'cw/rebase-i-root'Junio C Hamano
"git rebase [-i] --root $tip" can now be used to rewrite all the history down to the root. * cw/rebase-i-root: t3404: make test 57 work with dash and others Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto rebase -i: support --root without --onto
2012-07-05t3404: make test 57 work with dash and othersMichael J Gruber
The construct VAR=value test_must_fail command args works only for some shells (such as bash) but not others (such as dash) because VAR=value does not end up in the environment for command when it is called by the shell function test_must_fail. That is why we explicitly set and export variable in a subshell, i.e. ( VAR=value && export VAR && test_must_fail command args ) in most places already, bar the newly introduced 57 from b64b7fe (Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto, 2012-06-26). Make test 57 use that construct also. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-26Add tests for rebase -i --root without --ontoChris Webb
Test for likely breakages in t3404, including successful reordering of non-conflicting changes with a new root, correct preservation of commit message and author in a root commit when it is squashed with the sentinel, and presence of the sentinel following a conflicting cherry-pick of a new root. Remove test_must_fail for git rebase --root without --onto from t3412 as this case will now be successfully handled by an implicit git rebase -i. Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-13rebase -i: teach "--exec <cmd>"Lucien Kong
During an interactive rebase session, it is sometimes desirable to run tests on each commit in the resulting history. This can be done by adding "exec <test command>" when editing the insn sheet, but the command used for testing is often the same for all resulting commits. By passing "--exec <cmd>" from the command line, automatically add these "exec" lines after each commit in the final history. To work well with the --autosquash option, these are added at the end of each run of "fixup" and "squash". Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Lucien Kong <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Valentin Duperray <Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Franck Jonas <Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Thomas Nguy <Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen <Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-20Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano
By Jens Lehmann (1) and Johannes Sixt (1) * maint: Consistently use "superproject" instead of "supermodule" t3404: begin "exchange commits with -p" test with correct preconditions
2012-05-20t3404: begin "exchange commits with -p" test with correct preconditionsJohannes Sixt
The test case shows a bug in 'rebase -p', but even if the bug were fixed the test would fail because it did not ensure that the preconditions match the postconditions that were checked. Insert the suitable 'git checkout'. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-30diff --stat: use less columns for change countsZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Number of columns required for change counts is now computed based on the maximum number of changed lines instead of being fixed. This means that usually a few more columns will be available for the filenames and the graph. The graph width logic is also modified to include enough space for "Bin XXX -> YYY bytes". If changes to binary files are mixed with changes to text files, change counts are padded to take at least three columns. And the other way around, if change counts require more than three columns, then "Bin"s are padded to align with the change count. This way, the +- part starts in the same column as "XXX -> YYY" part for binary files. This makes the graph easier to parse visually thanks to the empty column. This mimics the layout of diff --stat before this change. Tests and the tutorial are updated to reflect the new --stat output. This means either the removal of extra padding and/or the addition of up to three extra characters to truncated filenames. One test is added to check the graph alignment when a binary file change and text file change of more than 999 lines are committed together. Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-09rebase -i continue: don't skip commits that only change submodulesJohn Keeping
When git-rebase--interactive stops due to a conflict and the only change to be committed is in a submodule, the test for whether there is anything to be committed ignores the staged submodule change. This leads rebase to skip creating the commit for the change. While unstaged submodule changes should be ignored to avoid needing to update submodules during a rebase, it is safe to remove the --ignore-submodules option to diff-index because --cached ensures that it is only checking the index. This was discussed in [1] and a test is included to ensure that unstaged changes are still ignored correctly. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/188713 Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-26rebase -i: clean error message for --continue after failed execMatthieu Moy
After an "exec false" stops the rebase and gives the control back to the user, if changes are added to the index, "rebase --continue" fails with this message, which may technically be correct, but does not point at the real problem: .../git-rebase--interactive: line 774: .../.git/rebase-merge/author-script: No such file or directory We could try auto-amending HEAD, but this goes against the logic of .git/rebase-merge/author-script (see also the testcase 'auto-amend only edited commits after "edit"' in t3404-rebase-interactive.sh) to auto-amend something the user hasn't explicitely asked to edit. Instead of doing anything automatically, detect the situation and give a clean error message. While we're there, also clarify the error message in case '. "$author_script"' fails, which now corresponds to really weird senario where the author script exists but can't be read. Test-case-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-06-19rebase -i -p: include non-first-parent commits in todo listAndrew Wong
Consider this graph: D---E (topic, HEAD) / / A---B---C (master) \ F (topic2) and the following three commands: 1. git rebase -i -p A 2. git rebase -i -p --onto F A 3. git rebase -i -p B Currently, (1) and (2) will pick B, D, C, and E onto A and F, respectively. However, (3) will only pick D and E onto B, but not C, which is inconsistent with (1) and (2). As a result, we cannot modify C during the interactive-rebase. The current behavior also creates a bug if we do: 4. git rebase -i -p C In (4), E is never picked. And since interactive-rebase resets "HEAD" to "onto" before picking any commits, D and E are lost after the interactive-rebase. This patch fixes the inconsistency and bug by ensuring that all children of upstream are always picked. This essentially reverts the commit: d80d6bc146232d81f1bb4bc58e5d89263fd228d4 When compiling the todo list, commits reachable from "upstream" should never be skipped under any conditions. Otherwise, we lose the ability to modify them like (3), and create a bug like (4). Two of the tests contain a scenario like (3). Since the new behavior added more commits for picking, these tests need to be updated to account for the additional pick lines. A new test has also been added for (4). Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-27rebase: write a reflog entry when finishingJeff King
When we finish a rebase, our detached HEAD is at the final result. We update the original branch ref with this result, and then point the HEAD symbolic ref at the updated branch. We write a reflog for the branch update, but not for the update of HEAD. Because we're already at the final result on the detached HEAD, moving to the branch actually doesn't change our commit sha1 at all. So in that sense, a reflog entry would be pointless. However, humans do read reflogs, and an entry saying "rebase finished: returning to refs/heads/master" can be helpful in understanding what is going on. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-28Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano
* maint: Prepare for 1.7.3.5 Fix false positives in t3404 due to SHELL=/bin/false close file on error in read_mmfile() Conflicts: RelNotes
2010-12-28Fix false positives in t3404 due to SHELL=/bin/falseRobin H. Johnson
If the user's shell in NSS passwd is /bin/false (eg as found during Gentoo's package building), the git-rebase exec tests will fail, because they call $SHELL around the command, and in the existing testcase, $SHELL was not being cleared sufficently. This lead to false positive failures of t3404 on systems where the package build user was locked down as noted above. Signed-off-by: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> X-Gentoo-Bug: 349083 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349083 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-08Merge branch 'jh/notes-merge'Junio C Hamano
* jh/notes-merge: (23 commits) Provide 'git merge --abort' as a synonym to 'git reset --merge' cmd_merge(): Parse options before checking MERGE_HEAD Provide 'git notes get-ref' to easily retrieve current notes ref git notes merge: Add testcases for merging notes trees at different fanouts git notes merge: Add another auto-resolving strategy: "cat_sort_uniq" git notes merge: --commit should fail if underlying notes ref has moved git notes merge: List conflicting notes in notes merge commit message git notes merge: Manual conflict resolution, part 2/2 git notes merge: Manual conflict resolution, part 1/2 Documentation: Preliminary docs on 'git notes merge' git notes merge: Add automatic conflict resolvers (ours, theirs, union) git notes merge: Handle real, non-conflicting notes merges builtin/notes.c: Refactor creation of notes commits. git notes merge: Initial implementation handling trivial merges only builtin/notes.c: Split notes ref DWIMmery into a separate function notes.c: Use two newlines (instead of one) when concatenating notes (trivial) t3303: Indent with tabs instead of spaces for consistency notes.h/c: Propagate combine_notes_fn return value to add_note() and beyond notes.h/c: Allow combine_notes functions to remove notes notes.c: Reorder functions in preparation for next commit ... Conflicts: builtin.h
2010-11-17notes.c: Use two newlines (instead of one) when concatenating notesJohan Herland
When using combine_notes_concatenate() to concatenate notes, it currently ensures exactly one newline character between the given notes. However, when using builtin/notes.c:create_note() to concatenate notes (e.g. by 'git notes append'), it adds a newline character to the trailing newline of the preceding notes object, thus resulting in _two_ newlines (aka. a blank line) separating contents of the two notes. This patch brings combine_notes_concatenate() into consistency with builtin/notes.c:create_note(), by ensuring exactly _two_ newline characters between concatenated notes. The patch also changes a few notes-related selftests accordingly. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3404: do not use 'describe' to implement test_cmp_revJunio C Hamano
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3404 (rebase -i): introduce helper to check position of HEADJonathan Nieder
The same code to check the position of HEAD is used by several tests in this script. Factor it out as a function and simplify it. Noticed using an &&-chaining tester, because the current code does not propagate the precise exit status from errors. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3404 (rebase -i): move comment to descriptionJonathan Nieder
Add a comment describing the setup in t3404 to its --help output. This should make it easier to decide where to put new functions without disrupting the flow of the file or obstructing the description of the test setup. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09t3404 (rebase -i): unroll test_commit loopsJonathan Nieder
Allow test_commit failures in loop iterations before the last one to cause the test assertion to fail. More importantly, avoiding these loops makes the test a little simpler to read and decreases the vertical screen footprint of the setup test assertion by one line. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&, batch 2Jonathan Nieder
Same rules as before: this patch only adds " &&" to the end of some lines in the test suite. Intended to be applied on top of or squashed with the last batch if they look okay. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-06t3404 & t7508: cd inside subshell instead of aroundJens Lehmann
Fixed all places where it was a straightforward change from cd'ing into a directory and back via "cd .." to a cd inside a subshell. Found these places with "git grep -w "cd \.\.". Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-22Merge branch 'mm/rebase-i-exec'Junio C Hamano
* mm/rebase-i-exec: git-rebase--interactive.sh: use printf instead of echo to print commit message git-rebase--interactive.sh: rework skip_unnecessary_picks test-lib: user-friendly alternatives to test [-d|-f|-e] rebase -i: add exec command to launch a shell command Conflicts: git-rebase--interactive.sh t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
2010-08-22Merge branch 'dg/local-mod-error-messages'Junio C Hamano
* dg/local-mod-error-messages: t7609: test merge and checkout error messages unpack_trees: group error messages by type merge-recursive: distinguish "removed" and "overwritten" messages merge-recursive: porcelain messages for checkout Turn unpack_trees_options.msgs into an array + enum Conflicts: t/t3400-rebase.sh
2010-08-11unpack_trees: group error messages by typeMatthieu Moy
When an error is encountered, it calls add_rejected_file() which either - directly displays the error message and stops if in plumbing mode (i.e. if show_all_errors is not initialized at 1) - or stores it so that it will be displayed at the end with display_error_msgs(), Storing the files by error type permits to have a list of files for which there is the same error instead of having a serie of almost identical errors. As each bind_overlap error combines a file and an old file, a list cannot be done, therefore, theses errors are not stored but directly displayed. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-11test-lib: user-friendly alternatives to test [-d|-f|-e]Matthieu Moy
The helper functions are implemented, documented, and used in a few places to validate them, but not everywhere to avoid useless code churn. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-11rebase -i: add exec command to launch a shell commandMatthieu Moy
The typical usage pattern would be to run a test (or simply a compilation command) at given points in history. The shell command is ran (from the worktree root), and the rebase is stopped when the command fails, to give the user an opportunity to fix the problem before continuing with "git rebase --continue". This needs a little rework of skip_unnecessary_picks, which wasn't robust enough to deal with lines like exec >"file name with many spaces" in the todolist. The new version extracts command, sha1 and rest from each line, but outputs the line itself verbatim to avoid changing the whitespace layout. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-07-26git-rebase--interactive.sh: use printf instead of echo to print commit messageBrandon Casey
On systems with an echo which defaults to the XSI-conformant behavior (Solaris, or others using Ksh), echo will interpret certain backslashed characters as control sequences. This can cause a problem for interactive rebase when it is used to rebase commits whose commit "subject" (the first line) contains any of these backslashed sequences. In this case, echo will substitute the control sequence for the backslashed characters and either the rebased commit message will differ from the original, or the rebase process will fail. Neither is desirable. So work around this issue by replacing the echo statements used to print out portions of the commit message, with printf. Also, add a test to test for this breakage. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-07-06rebase-i: do not get fooled by a log message ending with backslashJunio C Hamano
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-21Merge branch 'ic/maint-rebase-i-abort'Junio C Hamano
* ic/maint-rebase-i-abort: rebase -i: Abort cleanly if new base cannot be checked out
2010-06-11rebase -i: Abort cleanly if new base cannot be checked outIan Ward Comfort
Untracked content in the working tree may prevent rebase -i from checking out the new base onto which it wants to replay commits, if the new base commit includes files at those (now untracked) paths. Currently, rebase -i dies uncleanly in this situation, updating ORIG_HEAD and leaving a useless .git/rebase-merge directory, with which the user can do nothing useful except rebase --abort. Make rebase -i abort the procedure itself instead, as non-interactive rebase already does, and add a test for this behavior. Signed-off-by: Ian Ward Comfort <icomfort@stanford.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-11rebase -i -p: document shortcomingsJonathan Nieder
The rebase --preserve-merges facility presents a list of commits in its instruction sheet and uses a separate table to keep track of their parents. Unfortunately, in practice this means that with -p after most attempts to rearrange patches, some commits have the "wrong" parent and the resulting history is rarely what the caller expected. Yes, it would be nice to fix that. But first, add a warning to the manual to help the uninitiated understand what is going on. Reported-by: Jiří Paleček <jpalecek@web.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-03Merge branch 'mb/rebase-i-no-ff'Junio C Hamano
* mb/rebase-i-no-ff: Teach rebase the --no-ff option. Conflicts: git-rebase--interactive.sh t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
2010-04-03Merge branch 'do/rebase-i-arbitrary'Junio C Hamano
* do/rebase-i-arbitrary: rebase--interactive: don't require what's rebased to be a branch Conflicts: t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
2010-03-24Teach rebase the --no-ff option.Marc Branchaud
For git-rebase.sh, --no-ff is a synonym for --force-rebase. For git-rebase--interactive.sh, --no-ff cherry-picks all the commits in the rebased branch, instead of fast-forwarding over any unchanged commits. --no-ff offers an alternative way to deal with reverted merges. Instead of "reverting the revert" you can use "rebase --no-ff" to recreate the branch with entirely new commits (they're new because at the very least the committer time is different). This obviates the need to revert the reversion, as you can re-merge the new topic branch directly. Added an addendum to revert-a-faulty-merge.txt describing the situation and how to use --no-ff to handle it. Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-15rebase--interactive: don't require what's rebased to be a branchDave Olszewski
git rebase allows you to specify a non-branch commit-ish as the "branch" argument, which leaves HEAD detached when it's finished. This is occasionally useful, and this patch brings the same functionality to git rebase --interactive. Signed-off-by: Dave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-13rebase: support automatic notes copyingThomas Rast
Luckily, all the support already happens to be there. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-14rebase -i: Retain user-edited commit messages after squash/fixup conflictsMichael Haggerty
When a squash/fixup fails due to a conflict, the user is required to edit the commit message. Previously, if further squash/fixup commands followed the conflicting squash/fixup, this user-edited message was discarded and a new automatically-generated commit message was suggested. Change the handling of conflicts within squash/fixup command series: Whenever the user is required to intervene, consider the resulting commit to be a new basis for the following squash/fixups and use its commit message in later suggested combined commit messages. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-14t3404: Set up more of the test repo in the "setup" stepMichael Haggerty
...and reuse these pre-created branches in tests rather than creating duplicates. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-14rebase -i: For fixup commands without squashes, do not start editorMichael Haggerty
If the "rebase -i" commands include a series of fixup commands without any squash commands, then commit the combined commit using the commit message of the corresponding "pick" without starting up the commit-message editor. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-14rebase -i: Improve consistency of commit count in generated commit messagesMichael Haggerty
Use the numeral "2" instead of the word "two" when two commits are being interactively squashed. This makes the treatment consistent with that for higher numbers of commits. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-14t3404: Test the commit count in commit messages generated by "rebase -i"Michael Haggerty
The first line of commit messages generated for "rebase -i" squash/fixup commits includes a count of the number of commits that are being combined. Add machinery to check that this count is correct, and add such a check to some test cases. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-12rebase-i: Ignore comments and blank lines in peek_next_commandMichael Haggerty
Previously, blank lines and/or comments within a series of squash/fixup commands would confuse "git rebase -i" into thinking that the series was finished. It would therefore require the user to edit the commit message for the squash/fixup commits seen so far. Then, after continuing, it would ask the user to edit the commit message again. Ignore comments and blank lines within a group of squash/fixup commands, allowing them to be processed in one go. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-07Add a command "fixup" to rebase --interactiveMichael Haggerty
The command is like "squash", except that it discards the commit message of the corresponding commit. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>