summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>2017-03-24 18:40:57 (GMT)
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2017-03-24 19:15:26 (GMT)
commitac3f5a346860b824e083c5d305757c3260565475 (patch)
treeb1dfdaaf848507f24dbd84a17936da3482975819 /t/t3201-branch-contains.sh
parent1e0c3b680c6e7b37fc51bd69a410af01897a4f94 (diff)
downloadgit-ac3f5a346860b824e083c5d305757c3260565475.zip
git-ac3f5a346860b824e083c5d305757c3260565475.tar.gz
git-ac3f5a346860b824e083c5d305757c3260565475.tar.bz2
ref-filter: add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref
Change the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands to have a --no-contains option in addition to their longstanding --contains options. This allows for finding the last-good rollout tag given a known-bad <commit>. Given a hypothetically bad commit cf5c7253e0, the git version to revert to can be found with this hacky two-liner: (git tag -l 'v[0-9]*'; git tag -l --contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*') | sort | uniq -c | grep -E '^ *1 ' | awk '{print $2}' | tail -n 10 With this new --no-contains option the same can be achieved with: git tag -l --no-contains cf5c7253e0 'v[0-9]*' | sort | tail -n 10 As the filtering machinery is shared between the tag, branch & for-each-ref commands, implement this for those commands too. A practical use for this with "branch" is e.g. finding branches which were branched off between v2.8.0 and v2.10.0: git branch --contains v2.8.0 --no-contains v2.10.0 The "describe" command also has a --contains option, but its semantics are unrelated to what tag/branch/for-each-ref use --contains for. A --no-contains option for "describe" wouldn't make any sense, other than being exactly equivalent to not supplying --contains at all, which would be confusing at best. Add a --without option to "tag" as an alias for --no-contains, for consistency with --with and --contains. The --with option is undocumented, and possibly the only user of it is Junio (<xmqqefy71iej.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>). But it's trivial to support, so let's do that. The additions to the the test suite are inverse copies of the corresponding --contains tests. With this change --no-contains for tag, branch & for-each-ref is just as well tested as the existing --contains option. In addition to those tests, add a test for "tag" which asserts that --no-contains won't find tree/blob tags, which is slightly unintuitive, but consistent with how --contains works & is documented. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t3201-branch-contains.sh')
-rwxr-xr-xt/t3201-branch-contains.sh54
1 files changed, 51 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh b/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh
index daa3ae8..0ef1b6f 100755
--- a/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh
+++ b/t/t3201-branch-contains.sh
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#!/bin/sh
-test_description='branch --contains <commit>, --merged, and --no-merged'
+test_description='branch --contains <commit>, --no-contains <commit> --merged, and --no-merged'
. ./test-lib.sh
@@ -45,6 +45,22 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --contains master' '
'
+test_expect_success 'branch --no-contains=master' '
+
+ git branch --no-contains=master >actual &&
+ >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'branch --no-contains master' '
+
+ git branch --no-contains master >actual &&
+ >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+
+'
+
test_expect_success 'branch --contains=side' '
git branch --contains=side >actual &&
@@ -55,6 +71,16 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --contains=side' '
'
+test_expect_success 'branch --no-contains=side' '
+
+ git branch --no-contains=side >actual &&
+ {
+ echo " master"
+ } >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+
+'
+
test_expect_success 'branch --contains with pattern implies --list' '
git branch --contains=master master >actual &&
@@ -65,6 +91,14 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --contains with pattern implies --list' '
'
+test_expect_success 'branch --no-contains with pattern implies --list' '
+
+ git branch --no-contains=master master >actual &&
+ >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect actual
+
+'
+
test_expect_success 'side: branch --merged' '
git branch --merged >actual &&
@@ -126,7 +160,9 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --no-merged with pattern implies --list' '
test_expect_success 'implicit --list conflicts with modification options' '
test_must_fail git branch --contains=master -d &&
- test_must_fail git branch --contains=master -m foo
+ test_must_fail git branch --contains=master -m foo &&
+ test_must_fail git branch --no-contains=master -d &&
+ test_must_fail git branch --no-contains=master -m foo
'
@@ -136,7 +172,8 @@ test_expect_success 'Assert that --contains only works on commits, not trees & b
Some blob
EOF
) &&
- test_must_fail git branch --contains $blob
+ test_must_fail git branch --contains $blob &&
+ test_must_fail git branch --no-contains $blob
'
# We want to set up a case where the walk for the tracking info
@@ -168,4 +205,15 @@ test_expect_success 'branch --merged with --verbose' '
test_i18ncmp expect actual
'
+test_expect_success 'branch --contains combined with --no-contains' '
+ git branch --contains zzz --no-contains topic >actual &&
+ cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
+ master
+ side
+ zzz
+ EOF
+ test_cmp expect actual
+
+'
+
test_done