send-pack: move REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE logic a bit higher

20e8b465 (refactor ref status logic for pushing, 2010-01-08)
restructured the code to set status for each ref to be pushed, but
did not quite go far enough.  We inspect the status set earlier by
set_refs_status_for_push() and then perform yet another update to
the status of a ref with an otherwise OK status to be deleted to
mark it with REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE when the protocol tells us
never to delete.

Split the latter into a separate loop that comes before we enter the
per-ref loop.  This way we would have one less condition to check in
the main loop.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/send-pack.c b/send-pack.c
index 6129b0f..22a1709 100644
--- a/send-pack.c
+++ b/send-pack.c
@@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * NEEDSWORK: why does delete-refs have to be so specific to
+	 * send-pack machinery that set_ref_status_for_push() cannot
+	 * set this bit for us???
+	 */
+	for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next)
+		if (ref->deletion && !allow_deleting_refs)
+			ref->status = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE;
+
 	if (!args->dry_run)
 		advertise_shallow_grafts_buf(&req_buf);
 
@@ -249,17 +258,13 @@ int send_pack(struct send_pack_args *args,
 		case REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST:
 		case REF_STATUS_REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE:
 		case REF_STATUS_REJECT_STALE:
+		case REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE:
 		case REF_STATUS_UPTODATE:
 			continue;
 		default:
 			; /* do nothing */
 		}
 
-		if (ref->deletion && !allow_deleting_refs) {
-			ref->status = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NODELETE;
-			continue;
-		}
-
 		if (!ref->deletion)
 			new_refs++;