From 9dc527adbc013b67cd85cce67bdccc3c10ed4792 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 23:34:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fix strbuf take #2

I just remembered why I placed that bogus "sb->len ==0 implies
sb->eof" condition there.  We need at least something like this
to catch the normal EOF (that is, line termination immediately
followed by EOF) case.  "if (feof(fp))" fires when we have
already read the eof, not when we are about read it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

diff --git a/strbuf.c b/strbuf.c
index 6543308..672a1e4 100644
--- a/strbuf.c
+++ b/strbuf.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ void read_line(struct strbuf *sb, FILE *fp, int term) {
 			break;
 		strbuf_add(sb, ch);
 	}
+	if (ch == EOF && sb->len == 0)
+		sb->eof = 1;
 	strbuf_end(sb);
 }
 
-- 
cgit v0.10.2-6-g49f6