From 1084b845d9d77bcb2e8255636358dd0dc35360a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:19:05 -0800 Subject: Fix infinite loop when deleting multiple packed refs. It was stupid to link the same element twice to lock_file_list and end up in a loop, so we certainly need a fix. But it is not like we are taking a lock on multiple files in this case. It is just that we leave the linked element on the list even after commit_lock_file() successfully removes the cruft. We cannot remove the list element in commit_lock_file(); if we are interrupted in the middle of list manipulation, the call to remove_lock_file_on_signal() will happen with a broken list structure pointed by lock_file_list, which would cause the cruft to remain, so not removing the list element is the right thing to do. Instead we should be reusing the element already on the list. There is already a code for that in lock_file() function in lockfile.c. The code checks lk->next and the element is linked only when it is not already on the list -- which is incorrect for the last element on the list (which has NULL in its next field), but if you read the check as "is this element already on the list?" it actually makes sense. We do not want to link it on the list again, nor we would want to set up signal/atexit over and over. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h index f2ec5c8..a0e9727 100644 --- a/cache.h +++ b/cache.h @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ extern int refresh_cache(unsigned int flags); struct lock_file { struct lock_file *next; + char on_list; char filename[PATH_MAX]; }; extern int hold_lock_file_for_update(struct lock_file *, const char *path, int); diff --git a/lockfile.c b/lockfile.c index 2a2fea3..143d7d8 100644 --- a/lockfile.c +++ b/lockfile.c @@ -28,9 +28,12 @@ static int lock_file(struct lock_file *lk, const char *path) sprintf(lk->filename, "%s.lock", path); fd = open(lk->filename, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_EXCL, 0666); if (0 <= fd) { - if (!lk->next) { + if (!lk->on_list) { lk->next = lock_file_list; lock_file_list = lk; + lk->on_list = 1; + } + if (lock_file_list) { signal(SIGINT, remove_lock_file_on_signal); atexit(remove_lock_file); } @@ -38,6 +41,8 @@ static int lock_file(struct lock_file *lk, const char *path) return error("cannot fix permission bits on %s", lk->filename); } + else + lk->filename[0] = 0; return fd; } diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c index 0e156c5..1549f2a 100644 --- a/refs.c +++ b/refs.c @@ -644,7 +644,6 @@ static int repack_without_ref(const char *refname) } if (!found) return 0; - memset(&packlock, 0, sizeof(packlock)); fd = hold_lock_file_for_update(&packlock, git_path("packed-refs"), 0); if (fd < 0) return error("cannot delete '%s' from packed refs", refname); -- cgit v0.10.2-6-g49f6 From 8977c110b5bbd230c28c727ddb85856067d55cfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:09:08 -0800 Subject: pack-check.c::verify_packfile(): don't run SHA-1 update on huge data Running the SHA1_Update() on the whole packfile in a single call revealed an overflow problem we had in the SHA-1 implementation on POWER architecture some time ago, which was fixed with commit b47f509b (June 19, 2006). Other SHA-1 implementations may have a similar problem. The sliding mmap() series already makes chunked calls to SHA1_Update(), so this patch itself will become moot when it graduates to "master", but in the meantime, run the hash function in smaller chunks to prevent possible future problems. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano diff --git a/pack-check.c b/pack-check.c index c0caaee..8e123b7 100644 --- a/pack-check.c +++ b/pack-check.c @@ -1,16 +1,18 @@ #include "cache.h" #include "pack.h" +#define BATCH (1u<<20) + static int verify_packfile(struct packed_git *p) { unsigned long index_size = p->index_size; void *index_base = p->index_base; SHA_CTX ctx; unsigned char sha1[20]; - unsigned long pack_size = p->pack_size; - void *pack_base; struct pack_header *hdr; int nr_objects, err, i; + unsigned char *packdata; + unsigned long datasize; /* Header consistency check */ hdr = p->pack_base; @@ -25,11 +27,19 @@ static int verify_packfile(struct packed_git *p) "while idx size expects %d", nr_objects, num_packed_objects(p)); + /* Check integrity of pack data with its SHA-1 checksum */ SHA1_Init(&ctx); - pack_base = p->pack_base; - SHA1_Update(&ctx, pack_base, pack_size - 20); + packdata = p->pack_base; + datasize = p->pack_size - 20; + while (datasize) { + unsigned long batch = (datasize < BATCH) ? datasize : BATCH; + SHA1_Update(&ctx, packdata, batch); + datasize -= batch; + packdata += batch; + } SHA1_Final(sha1, &ctx); - if (hashcmp(sha1, (unsigned char *)pack_base + pack_size - 20)) + + if (hashcmp(sha1, (unsigned char *)(p->pack_base) + p->pack_size - 20)) return error("Packfile %s SHA1 mismatch with itself", p->pack_name); if (hashcmp(sha1, (unsigned char *)index_base + index_size - 40)) -- cgit v0.10.2-6-g49f6