From 51243f9f0f6a932ea579fd6f8014b348f8c2a523 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=C3=86var=20Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0=20Bjarmason?= Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 23:02:24 +0200 Subject: run-command API: don't fall back on online_cpus() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit When a "jobs = 0" is passed let's BUG() out rather than fall back on online_cpus(). The default behavior was added when this API was implemented in c553c72eed6 (run-command: add an asynchronous parallel child processor, 2015-12-15). Most of our code in-tree that scales up to "online_cpus()" by default calls that function by itself. Keeping this default behavior just for the sake of two callers means that we'd need to maintain this one spot where we're second-guessing the config passed down into pp_init(). The preceding commit has an overview of the API callers that passed "jobs = 0". There were only two of them (actually three, but they resolved to these two config parsing codepaths). The "fetch.parallel" caller already had a test for the "fetch.parallel=0" case added in 0353c688189 (fetch: do not run a redundant fetch from submodule, 2022-05-16), but there was no such test for "submodule.fetchJobs". Let's add one here. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano diff --git a/builtin/fetch.c b/builtin/fetch.c index 78043fb..82f1da1 100644 --- a/builtin/fetch.c +++ b/builtin/fetch.c @@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ static int git_fetch_config(const char *k, const char *v, void *cb) fetch_parallel_config = git_config_int(k, v); if (fetch_parallel_config < 0) die(_("fetch.parallel cannot be negative")); + if (!fetch_parallel_config) + fetch_parallel_config = online_cpus(); return 0; } diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c index 14a6e38..14ea409 100644 --- a/run-command.c +++ b/run-command.c @@ -1564,8 +1564,8 @@ static void pp_init(struct parallel_processes *pp, task_finished_fn task_finished, void *data, int ungroup) { - if (n < 1) - n = online_cpus(); + if (!n) + BUG("you must provide a non-zero number of processes!"); pp->max_processes = n; @@ -1835,8 +1835,7 @@ void run_processes_parallel_tr2(size_t n, get_next_task_fn get_next_task, task_finished_fn task_finished, void *pp_cb, const char *tr2_category, const char *tr2_label) { - trace2_region_enter_printf(tr2_category, tr2_label, NULL, "max:%d", - ((n < 1) ? online_cpus() : n)); + trace2_region_enter_printf(tr2_category, tr2_label, NULL, "max:%d", n); run_processes_parallel(n, get_next_task, start_failure, task_finished, pp_cb); diff --git a/submodule-config.c b/submodule-config.c index cd7ee23..4dc61b3 100644 --- a/submodule-config.c +++ b/submodule-config.c @@ -303,6 +303,8 @@ int parse_submodule_fetchjobs(const char *var, const char *value) int fetchjobs = git_config_int(var, value); if (fetchjobs < 0) die(_("negative values not allowed for submodule.fetchJobs")); + if (!fetchjobs) + fetchjobs = online_cpus(); return fetchjobs; } diff --git a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh index a301b56..a5f494d 100755 --- a/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh +++ b/t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh @@ -714,7 +714,13 @@ test_expect_success 'fetching submodules respects parallel settings' ' GIT_TRACE=$(pwd)/trace.out git fetch && grep "8 tasks" trace.out && GIT_TRACE=$(pwd)/trace.out git fetch --jobs 9 && - grep "9 tasks" trace.out + grep "9 tasks" trace.out && + >trace.out && + + GIT_TRACE=$(pwd)/trace.out git -c submodule.fetchJobs=0 fetch && + grep "preparing to run up to [0-9]* tasks" trace.out && + ! grep "up to 0 tasks" trace.out && + >trace.out ) ' -- cgit v0.10.2-6-g49f6