From 082036688f528d28ef5b63d9491a0ec0d701f68a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Schindelin Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:42:33 +0100 Subject: filter-branch: fix remnants of old syntax in documentation Some time ago, filter-branch's syntax changed so that more than one ref can be rewritten at the same time. This involved the removal of the ref name for the result; instead, the refs are rewritten in-place. This updates the last leftovers in the documentation to reflect the new behavior. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano diff --git a/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt b/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt index ae03514..4f89c04 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-filter-branch.txt @@ -17,19 +17,19 @@ SYNOPSIS DESCRIPTION ----------- -Lets you rewrite git revision history by creating a new branch from -your current branch, applying custom filters on each revision. +Lets you rewrite git revision history by rewriting the branches mentioned +in the , applying custom filters on each revision. Those filters can modify each tree (e.g. removing a file or running a perl rewrite on all files) or information about each commit. Otherwise, all information (including original commit times or merge information) will be preserved. -The command takes the new branch name as a mandatory argument and -the filters as optional arguments. If you specify no filters, the -commits will be recommitted without any changes, which would normally -have no effect. Nevertheless, this may be useful in the future for -compensating for some git bugs or such, therefore such a usage is -permitted. +The command will only rewrite the _positive_ refs mentioned in the +command line (i.e. if you pass 'a..b', only 'b' will be rewritten). +If you specify no filters, the commits will be recommitted without any +changes, which would normally have no effect. Nevertheless, this may be +useful in the future for compensating for some git bugs or such, +therefore such a usage is permitted. *WARNING*! The rewritten history will have different object names for all the objects and will not converge with the original branch. You will not @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ if different from the rewritten ones, will be stored in the namespace 'refs/original/'. Note that since this operation is extensively I/O expensive, it might -be a good idea to redirect the temporary directory off-disk, e.g. on -tmpfs. Reportedly the speedup is very noticeable. +be a good idea to redirect the temporary directory off-disk with the +'-d' option, e.g. on tmpfs. Reportedly the speedup is very noticeable. Filters @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ OPTIONS As a special extension, the commit filter may emit multiple commit ids; in that case, ancestors of the original commit will have all of them as parents. ++ +Note that the 'map' function is not available in the commit filter yet. +This will be changed in a future version. --tag-name-filter :: This is the filter for rewriting tag names. When passed, @@ -186,8 +189,8 @@ order to paste the other history behind the current history: git filter-branch --parent-filter 'sed "s/^\$/-p /"' HEAD ------------------------------------------------------------------- -(if the parent string is empty - therefore we are dealing with the -initial commit - add graftcommit as a parent). Note that this assumes +(if the parent string is empty - which happens when we are dealing with +the initial commit - add graftcommit as a parent). Note that this assumes history with a single root (that is, no merge without common ancestors happened). If this is not the case, use: @@ -232,11 +235,12 @@ range in addition to the new branch name. The new branch name will point to the top-most revision that a 'git rev-list' of this range will print. -Note that the changes introduced by the commits, and not reverted by -subsequent commits, will still be in the rewritten branch. If you want +*NOTE* the changes introduced by the commits, and which are not reverted +by subsequent commits, will still be in the rewritten branch. If you want to throw out _changes_ together with the commits, you should use the interactive mode of gitlink:git-rebase[1]. + Consider this history: ------------------ -- cgit v0.10.2-6-g49f6