git - Git: sistema de control de versiones

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2018-06-28	fetch-pack: put shallow info in output parameter	Brandon Williams
	Expand the transport fetch method signature, by adding an output parameter, to allow transports to return information about the refs they have fetched. Then communicate shallow status information through this mechanism instead of by modifying the input list of refs. This does require clients to sometimes generate the ref map twice: once from the list of refs provided by the remote (as is currently done) and potentially once from the new list of refs that the fetch mechanism provides. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-15	transport: convert get_refs_list to take a list of ref prefixes	Brandon Williams
	Convert the 'struct transport' virtual function 'get_refs_list()' to optionally take an argv_array of ref prefixes. When communicating with a server using protocol v2 these ref prefixes can be sent when requesting a listing of their refs allowing the server to filter the refs it sends based on the sent prefixes. This list will be ignored when not using protocol v2. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-14	transport: make transport vtable more private	Jonathan Tan
	Move the definition of the transport-specific functions provided by transports, whether declared in transport.c or transport-helper.c, into an internal header. This means that transport-using code (as opposed to transport-declaring code) can no longer access these functions (without importing the internal header themselves), making it clear that they should use the transport_*() functions instead, and also allowing the interface between the transport mechanism and an individual transport to independently evolve. This is superficially a reversal of commit 824d5776c3f2 ("Refactor struct transport_ops inlined into struct transport", 2007-09-19). However, the scope of the involved variables was neither affected nor discussed in that commit, and I think that the advantages in making those functions more private outweigh the advantages described in that commit's commit message. A minor additional point is that the code has gotten more complicated since then, in that the function-pointer variables are potentially mutated twice (once initially and once if transport_take_over() is invoked), increasing the value of corralling them into their own struct. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>