summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-11-21Merge branch 'np/log-graph-octopus-fix' into maintJunio C Hamano
"git log --graph" showing an octopus merge sometimes miscounted the number of display columns it is consuming to show the merge and its parent commits, which has been corrected. * np/log-graph-octopus-fix: log: fix coloring of certain octopus merge shapes
2018-11-21Merge branch 'sg/split-index-racefix' into maintJunio C Hamano
The codepath to support the experimental split-index mode had remaining "racily clean" issues fixed. * sg/split-index-racefix: split-index: BUG() when cache entry refers to non-existing shared entry split-index: smudge and add racily clean cache entries to split index split-index: don't compare cached data of entries already marked for split index split-index: count the number of deleted entries t1700-split-index: date back files to avoid racy situations split-index: add tests to demonstrate the racy split index problem t1700-split-index: document why FSMONITOR is disabled in this test script
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jt/non-blob-lazy-fetch' into maintJunio C Hamano
A partial clone that is configured to lazily fetch missing objects will on-demand issue a "git fetch" request to the originating repository to fill not-yet-obtained objects. The request has been optimized for requesting a tree object (and not the leaf blob objects contained in it) by telling the originating repository that no blobs are needed. * jt/non-blob-lazy-fetch: fetch-pack: exclude blobs when lazy-fetching trees fetch-pack: avoid object flags if no_dependents
2018-11-21Merge branch 'sm/show-superproject-while-conflicted' into maintJunio C Hamano
A corner-case bugfix. * sm/show-superproject-while-conflicted: rev-parse: --show-superproject-working-tree should work during a merge
2018-11-21Merge branch 'en/status-multiple-renames-to-the-same-target-fix' into maintJunio C Hamano
The code in "git status" sometimes hit an assertion failure. This was caused by a structure that was reused without cleaning the data used for the first run, which has been corrected. * en/status-multiple-renames-to-the-same-target-fix: commit: fix erroneous BUG, 'multiple renames on the same target? how?'
2018-11-21Merge branch 'ds/commit-graph-with-grafts' into maintJunio C Hamano
The recently introduced commit-graph auxiliary data is incompatible with mechanisms such as replace & grafts that "breaks" immutable nature of the object reference relationship. Disable optimizations based on its use (and updating existing commit-graph) when these incompatible features are in use in the repository. * ds/commit-graph-with-grafts: commit-graph: close_commit_graph before shallow walk commit-graph: not compatible with uninitialized repo commit-graph: not compatible with grafts commit-graph: not compatible with replace objects test-repository: properly init repo commit-graph: update design document refs.c: upgrade for_each_replace_ref to be a each_repo_ref_fn callback refs.c: migrate internal ref iteration to pass thru repository argument
2018-11-21Merge branch 'tg/range-diff-corner-case-fix' into maintJunio C Hamano
Recently added "range-diff" had a corner-case bug to cause it segfault, which has been corrected. * tg/range-diff-corner-case-fix: linear-assignment: fix potential out of bounds memory access
2018-11-21Merge branch 'en/update-ref-no-deref-stdin' into maintJunio C Hamano
"git update-ref" learned to make both "--no-deref" and "--stdin" work at the same time. * en/update-ref-no-deref-stdin: update-ref: allow --no-deref with --stdin update-ref: fix type of update_flags variable to match its usage
2018-11-21Merge branch 'ms/remote-error-message-update' into maintJunio C Hamano
Update error messages given by "git remote" and make them consistent. * ms/remote-error-message-update: builtin/remote: quote remote name on error to display empty name
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jt/lazy-object-fetch-fix' into maintJunio C Hamano
The code to backfill objects in lazily cloned repository did not work correctly, which has been corrected. * jt/lazy-object-fetch-fix: fetch-object: set exact_oid when fetching fetch-object: unify fetch_object[s] functions
2018-11-21Merge branch 'en/sequencer-empty-edit-result-aborts' into maintJunio C Hamano
"git rebase" etc. in Git 2.19 fails to abort when given an empty commit log message as result of editing, which has been corrected. * en/sequencer-empty-edit-result-aborts: sequencer: fix --allow-empty-message behavior, make it smarter
2018-11-21Merge branch 'nd/attr-pathspec-fix' into maintJunio C Hamano
"git add ':(attr:foo)'" is not supported and is supposed to be rejected while the command line arguments are parsed, but we fail to reject such a command line upfront. * nd/attr-pathspec-fix: add: do not accept pathspec magic 'attr'
2018-11-21Merge branch 'en/rerere-multi-stage-1-fix' into maintJunio C Hamano
A corner case bugfix in "git rerere" code. * en/rerere-multi-stage-1-fix: rerere: avoid buffer overrun t4200: demonstrate rerere segfault on specially crafted merge
2018-11-21Merge branch 'js/mingw-o-append' into maintJunio C Hamano
Further fix for O_APPEND emulation on Windows * js/mingw-o-append: mingw: fix mingw_open_append to work with named pipes t0051: test GIT_TRACE to a windows named pipe
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jk/reopen-tempfile-truncate' into maintJunio C Hamano
Fix for a long-standing bug that leaves the index file corrupt when it shrinks during a partial commit. * jk/reopen-tempfile-truncate: reopen_tempfile(): truncate opened file
2018-11-21Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-autosquash-fix' into maintJunio C Hamano
"git rebase -i" did not clear the state files correctly when a run of "squash/fixup" is aborted and then the user manually amended the commit instead, which has been corrected. * js/rebase-i-autosquash-fix: rebase -i: be careful to wrap up fixup/squash chains rebase -i --autosquash: demonstrate a problem skipping the last squash
2018-11-21Merge branch 'jk/trailer-fixes' into maintJunio C Hamano
"git interpret-trailers" and its underlying machinery had a buggy code that attempted to ignore patch text after commit log message, which triggered in various codepaths that will always get the log message alone and never get such an input. * jk/trailer-fixes: append_signoff: use size_t for string offsets sequencer: ignore "---" divider when parsing trailers pretty, ref-filter: format %(trailers) with no_divider option interpret-trailers: allow suppressing "---" divider interpret-trailers: tighten check for "---" patch boundary trailer: pass process_trailer_opts to trailer_info_get() trailer: use size_t for iterating trailer list trailer: use size_t for string offsets
2018-10-31Adjust for 2.19.x seriesJunio C Hamano
* jk/detect-truncated-zlib-input cat-file: handle streaming failures consistently check_stream_sha1(): handle input underflow t1450: check large blob in trailing-garbage test
2018-10-31check_stream_sha1(): handle input underflowJeff King
This commit fixes an infinite loop when fscking large truncated loose objects. The check_stream_sha1() function takes an mmap'd loose object buffer and streams 4k of output at a time, checking its sha1. The loop quits when we've output enough bytes (we know the size from the object header), or when zlib tells us anything except Z_OK or Z_BUF_ERROR. The latter is expected because zlib may run out of room in our 4k buffer, and that is how it tells us to process the output and loop again. But Z_BUF_ERROR also covers another case: one in which zlib cannot make forward progress because it needs more _input_. This should never happen in this loop, because though we're streaming the output, we have the entire deflated input available in the mmap'd buffer. But since we don't check this case, we'll just loop infinitely if we do see a truncated object, thinking that zlib is asking for more output space. It's tempting to fix this by checking stream->avail_in as part of the loop condition (and quitting if all of our bytes have been consumed). But that assumes that once zlib has consumed the input, there is nothing left to do. That's not necessarily the case: it may have read our input into its internal state, but still have bytes to output. Instead, let's continue on Z_BUF_ERROR only when we see the case we're expecting: the previous round filled our output buffer completely. If it didn't (and we still saw Z_BUF_ERROR), we know something is wrong and should break out of the loop. The bug comes from commit f6371f9210 (sha1_file: add read_loose_object() function, 2017-01-13), which reimplemented some of the existing loose object functions. So it's worth checking if this bug was inherited from any of those. The answers seems to be no. The two obvious candidates are both OK: 1. unpack_sha1_rest(); this doesn't need to loop on Z_BUF_ERROR at all, since it allocates the expected output buffer in advance (which we can't do since we're explicitly streaming here) 2. check_object_signature(); the streaming path relies on the istream interface, which uses read_istream_loose() for this case. That function uses a similar "is our output buffer full" check with Z_BUF_ERROR (which is where I stole it from for this patch!) Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-31t1450: check large blob in trailing-garbage testJeff King
Commit cce044df7f (fsck: detect trailing garbage in all object types, 2017-01-13) added two tests of trailing garbage in a loose object file: one with a commit and one with a blob. The point of having two is that blobs would follow a different code path that streamed the contents, instead of loading it into a buffer as usual. At the time, merely being a blob was enough to trigger the streaming code path. But since 7ac4f3a007 (fsck: actually fsck blob data, 2018-05-02), we now only stream blobs that are actually large. So since then, the streaming code path is not tested at all for this case. We can restore the original intent of the test by tweaking core.bigFileThreshold to make our small blob seem large. There's no easy way to externally verify that we followed the streaming code path, but I did check before/after using a temporary debug statement. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-30test-lib: introduce the '-V' short option for '--verbose-log'SZEDER Gábor
'--verbose-log' is one of the most useful and thus most frequently used test options, but due to its length it's a pain to type on the command line. Let's introduce the corresponding short option '-V' to save some keystrokes. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-29t3404-rebase-interactive: test abbreviated commandsJohannes Sixt
Make sure that each short command is tested at least once. To not exacerbate the runtime of the test script, do not add new tests, but modify existing ones according to these criteria: - The test does not have a prerequisite. - The 'git rebase' command is not guarded by test_must_fail. The pick commands are optional in the FAKE_LINES variable, but when used, they do end up in the insn sheet. Test them, too. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-25repack -ad: prune the list of shallow commitsJohannes Schindelin
`git repack` can drop unreachable commits without further warning, making the corresponding entries in `.git/shallow` invalid, which causes serious problems when deepening the branches. One scenario where unreachable commits are dropped by `git repack` is when a `git fetch --prune` (or even a `git fetch` when a ref was force-pushed in the meantime) can make a commit unreachable that was reachable before. Therefore it is not safe to assume that a `git repack -adlf` will keep unreachable commits alone (under the assumption that they had not been packed in the first place, which is an assumption at least some of Git's code seems to make). This is particularly important to keep in mind when looking at the `.git/shallow` file: if any commits listed in that file become unreachable, it is not a problem, but if they go missing, it *is* a problem. One symptom of this problem is that a deepening fetch may now fail with fatal: error in object: unshallow <commit-hash> To avoid this problem, let's prune the shallow list in `git repack` when the `-d` option is passed, unless `-A` is passed, too (which would force the now-unreachable objects to be turned into loose objects instead of being deleted). Additionally, we also need to take `--keep-reachable` and `--unpack-unreachable=<date>` into account. Note: an alternative solution discussed during the review of this patch was to teach `git fetch` to simply ignore entries in .git/shallow if the corresponding commits do not exist locally. A quick test, however, revealed that the .git/shallow file is written during a shallow *clone*, in which case the commits do not exist, either, but the "shallow" line *does* need to be sent. Therefore, this approach would be a lot more finicky than the approach presented by the this patch. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-25repack: point out a bug handling stale shallow infoJohannes Schindelin
A `git fetch --prune` can turn previously-reachable objects unreachable, even commits that are in the `shallow` list. A subsequent `git repack -ad` will then unceremoniously drop those unreachable commits, and the `shallow` list will become stale. This means that when we try to fetch with a larger `--depth` the next time, we may end up with: fatal: error in object: unshallow <commit-hash> Reported by Alejandro Pauly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-25t0061: adjust to test-tool transitionJunio C Hamano
2018-10-25run-command: mark path lookup errors with ENOENTJeff King
Since commit e3a434468f (run-command: use the async-signal-safe execv instead of execvp, 2017-04-19), prepare_cmd() does its own PATH lookup for any commands we run (on non-Windows platforms). However, its logic does not match the old execvp call when we fail to find a matching entry in the PATH. Instead of feeding the name directly to execv, execvp would consider that an ENOENT error. By continuing and passing the name directly to execv, we effectively behave as if "." was included at the end of the PATH. This can have confusing and even dangerous results. The fix itself is pretty straight-forward. There's a new test in t0061 to cover this explicitly, and I've also added a duplicate of the ENOENT test to ensure that we return the correct errno for this case. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-23exclude-promisor-objects: declare when option is allowedMatthew DeVore
The --exclude-promisor-objects option causes some funny behavior in at least two commands: log and blame. It causes a BUG crash: $ git log --exclude-promisor-objects BUG: revision.c:2143: exclude_promisor_objects can only be used when fetch_if_missing is 0 Aborted [134] Fix this such that the option is treated like any other unknown option. The commands that must support it are limited, so declare in those commands that the flag is supported. In particular: pack-objects prune rev-list The commands were found by searching for logic which parses --exclude-promisor-objects outside of revision.c. Extra logic outside of revision.c is needed because fetch_if_missing must be turned on before revision.c sees the option or it will BUG-crash. The above list is supported by the fact that no other command is introspectively invoked by another command passing --exclude-promisor-object. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-22diff: don't attempt to strip prefix from absolute Windows pathsJohannes Sixt
git diff can be invoked with absolute paths. Typically, this triggers the --no-index case. Then the absolute paths remain in the file names that are printed in the output. There is one peculiarity, though: When the command is invoked from a a sub-directory in a repository, then it is attempted to strip the sub-directory from the beginning of relative paths. Yet, to detect a relative path the code just checks for an initial forward slash. This mistakes a Windows style path like "D:/base" as a relative path and the output looks like this, for example: D:\dir\test\one>git -P diff --numstat D:\dir\base D:\dir\diff 1 1 ir/{base => diff}/1.txt where the correct output should be D:\dir\test\one>git -P diff --numstat D:\dir\base D:\dir\diff 1 1 D:/dir/{base => diff}/1.txt If the sub-directory where 'git diff' is invoked is sufficiently deep that the prefix becomes longer than the path to be printed, then the subsequent code accesses the path out of bounds. Use is_absolute_path() to detect Windows style absolute paths. One might wonder whether the check for a directory separator that is visible in the patch context should be changed from == '/' to is_dir_sep() or not. It turns out not to be necessary. That code only ever investigates paths that have undergone pathspec normalization, after which there are only forward slashes even on Windows. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19receive: denyCurrentBranch=updateinstead should not blindly updateJunio C Hamano
The handling of receive.denyCurrentBranch=updateInstead was added to a switch statement that handles other values of the variable, but all the other case arms only checked a condition to reject the attempted push, or let later logic in the same function to still intervene, so that a push that does not fast-forward (which is checked after the switch statement in question) is still rejected. But the handling of updateInstead incorrectly took immediate effect, without giving other checks a chance to intervene. Instead of calling update_worktree() that causes the side effect immediately, just note the fact that we will need to call the function later, and first give other checks a chance to reject the request. After the update-hook gets a chance to reject the push (which happens as the last step in a series of checks), call update_worktree() when we earlier detected the need to. Reported-by: Rajesh Madamanchi Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19pack-objects (mingw): initialize `packing_data` mutex in the correct spotJohannes Schindelin
In 9ac3f0e5b3e4 (pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large deltas, 2018-07-22), a mutex was introduced that is used to guard the call to set the delta size. This commit even added code to initialize it, but at an incorrect spot: in `init_threaded_search()`, while the call to `oe_set_delta_size()` (and hence to `packing_data_lock()`) can happen in the call chain `check_object()` <- `get_object_details()` <- `prepare_pack()` <- `cmd_pack_objects()`, which is long before the `prepare_pack()` function calls `ll_find_deltas()` (which initializes the threaded search). Another tell-tale that the mutex was initialized in an incorrect spot is that the function to initialize it lives in builtin/, while the code that uses the mutex is defined in a libgit.a header file. Let's use a more appropriate function: `prepare_packing_data()`, which not only lives in libgit.a, but *has* to be called before the `packing_data` struct is used that contains that mutex. This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1839. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19pack-objects (mingw): demonstrate a segmentation fault with large deltasJohannes Schindelin
There is a problem in the way 9ac3f0e5b3e4 (pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large deltas, 2018-07-22) initializes that mutex in the `packing_data` struct. The problem manifests in a segmentation fault on Windows, when a mutex (AKA critical section) is accessed without being initialized. (With pthreads, you apparently do not really have to initialize them?) This was reported in https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1839. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-12log: fix coloring of certain octopus merge shapesNoam Postavsky
For octopus merges where the first parent edge immediately merges into the next column to the left, the number of columns should be one less than the usual case. First parent to the left case: | *-. | |\ \ |/ / / The usual case: | *-. | |\ \ | | | * Also refactor the code to iterate over columns rather than dashes, building from an initial patch suggested by Jeff King. Signed-off-by: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-11split-index: smudge and add racily clean cache entries to split indexSZEDER Gábor
Ever since the split index feature was introduced [1], refreshing a split index is prone to a variant of the classic racy git problem. Consider the following sequence of commands updating the split index when the shared index contains a racily clean cache entry, i.e. an entry whose cached stat data matches with the corresponding file in the worktree and the cached mtime matches that of the index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # size stays the same! # ... wait ... git update-index --add other-file Normally, when a non-split index is updated, then do_write_index() (the function responsible for writing all kinds of indexes, "regular", split, and shared) recognizes racily clean cache entries, and writes them with smudged stat data, i.e. with file size set to 0. When subsequent git commands read the index, they will notice that the smudged stat data doesn't match with the file in the worktree, and then go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. In the above example, however, in the second 'git update-index' prepare_to_write_split_index() decides which cache entries stored only in the shared index should be replaced in the new split index. Alas, this function never looks out for racily clean cache entries, and since the file's stat data in the worktree hasn't changed since the shared index was written, it won't be replaced in the new split index. Consequently, do_write_index() doesn't even get this racily clean cache entry, and can't smudge its stat data. Subsequent git commands will then see that the index has more recent mtime than the file and that the (not smudged) cached stat data still matches with the file in the worktree, and, ultimately, will erroneously consider the file clean. Modify prepare_to_write_split_index() to recognize racily clean cache entries, and mark them to be added to the split index. Note that there are two places where it should check raciness: first those cache entries that are only stored in the shared index, and then those that have been copied by unpack_trees() from the shared index while it constructed a new index. This way do_write_index() will get these racily clean cache entries as well, and will then write them with smudged stat data to the new split index. This change makes all tests in 't1701-racy-split-index.sh' pass, so flip the two 'test_expect_failure' tests to success. Also add the '#' (as in nr. of trial) to those tests' description that were omitted when the tests expected failure. Note that after this change if the index is split when it contains a racily clean cache entry, then a smudged cache entry will be written both to the new shared and to the new split indexes. This doesn't affect regular git commands: as far as they are concerned this is just an entry in the split index replacing an outdated entry in the shared index. It did affect a few tests in 't1700-split-index.sh', though, because they actually check which entries are stored in the split index; a previous patch in this series has already made the necessary adjustments in 't1700'. And racily clean cache entries and index splitting are rare enough to not worry about the resulting duplicated smudged cache entries, and the additional complexity required to prevent them is not worth it. Several tests failed occasionally when the test suite was run with 'GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=yes'. Here are those that I managed to trace back to this racy split index problem, starting with those failing more frequently, with a link to a failing Travis CI build job for each. The highlighted line [2] shows when the racy file was written, which is not always in the failing test but in a preceeding setup test. t3903-stash.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/385542084#L5858 t4024-diff-optimize-common.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/386531969#L3174 t4015-diff-whitespace.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/360797600#L8215 t2200-add-update.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/382543426#L3051 t0090-cache-tree.sh: https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/416583010#L3679 There might be others, e.g. perhaps 't1000-read-tree-m-3way.sh' and others using 'lib-read-tree-m-3way.sh', but I couldn't confirm yet. [1] In the branch leading to the merge commit v2.1.0-rc0~45 (Merge branch 'nd/split-index', 2014-07-16). [2] Note that those highlighted lines are in the 'after failure' fold, and your browser might unhelpfully fold it up before you could take a good look. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-11t1700-split-index: date back files to avoid racy situationsSZEDER Gábor
't1700-split-index.sh' checks that the index was split correctly under various circumstances and that all the different ways to turn the split index feature on and off work correctly. To do so, most of its tests use 'test-tool dump-split-index' to see which files have their cache entries in the split index. All these tests assume that all cache entries are written to the shared index (called "base" throughout these tests) when a new shared index is created. This is an implementation detail: most git commands (basically all except 'git update-index') don't care or know at all about split index or whether a cache entry is stored in the split or shared index. As demonstrated in the previous patch, refreshing a split index is prone to a variant of the classic racy git issue. The next patch will fix this issue, but while doing so it will also slightly change this behaviour: only cache entries with mtime in the past will be written only to the newly created shared index, but racily clean cache entries will be written to the new split index (with smudged stat data). While this upcoming change won't at all affect any git commands, it will violate the above mentioned assumption of 't1700's tests. Since these tests create or modify files and create or refresh the split index in rapid succession, there are plenty of racily clean cache entries to be dealt with, which will then be written to the new split indexes, and, ultimately, will cause several tests in 't1700' to fail. Let's prepare 't1700-split-index.sh' for this upcoming change and modify its tests to avoid racily clean files by backdating the mtime of any file modifications (and since a lot of tests create or modify files, encapsulate it into a helper function). Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-11split-index: add tests to demonstrate the racy split index problemSZEDER Gábor
Ever since the split index feature was introduced [1], refreshing a split index is prone to a variant of the classic racy git problem. There are a couple of unrelated tests in the test suite that occasionally fail when run with 'GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX=yes', but 't1700-split-index.sh', the only test script focusing solely on split index, has never noticed this issue, because it only cares about how the index is split under various circumstances and all the different ways to turn the split index feature on and off. Add a dedicated test script 't1701-racy-split-index.sh' to exercise the split index feature in racy situations as well; kind of a "t0010-racy-git.sh for split index" but with modern style (the tests do everything in &&-chained list of commands in 'test_expect_...' blocks, and use 'test_cmp' for more informative output on failure). The tests cover the following sequences of index splitting, updating, and racy file modifications, with the last two cases demonstrating the racy split index problem: 1. Split the index while adding a racily clean file: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # size stays the same This case already works properly. Even though the cache entry's stat data matches with the modifid file in the worktree, subsequent git commands will notice that the (split) index and the file have the same mtime, and then will go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. 2. Add a racily clean file to an already split index: git update-index --split-index echo "cached content" >file git update-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file This case already works properly. After the second 'git update-index' writes the newly added file's cache entry to the new split index, it basically works in the same way as case #1. 3. Split the index when it (i.e. the not yet splitted index) contains a racily clean cache entry, i.e. an entry whose cached stat data matches with the corresponding file in the worktree and the cached mtime matches that of the index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # ... wait ... git update-index --split-index --add other-file This case already works properly. The shared index is written by do_write_index(), i.e. the same function that is responsible for writing "regular" and split indexes as well. This function cleverly notices the racily clean cache entry, and writes the entry to the new shared index with smudged stat data, i.e. file size set to 0. When subsequent git commands read the index, they will notice that the smudged stat data doesn't match with the file in the worktree, and then go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. 4. Update the split index when it contains a racily clean cache entry: git update-index --split-index echo "cached content" >file git update-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # ... wait ... git update-index --add other-file This case already works properly. After the second 'git update-index' the newly added file's cache entry is only stored in the split index. If a cache entry is present in the split index (even if it is a replacement of an outdated entry in the shared index), then it will always be included in the new split index on subsequent split index updates (until the file is removed or a new shared index is written), independently from whether the entry is racily clean or not. When do_write_index() writes the new split index, it notices the racily clean cache entry, and smudges its stat date. Subsequent git commands reading the index will notice the smudged stat data and then go on to check the file's content and notice its dirtiness. 5. Update the split index when a racily clean cache entry is stored only in the shared index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # ... wait ... git update-index --add other-file This case fails due to the racy split index problem. In the second 'git update-index' prepare_to_write_split_index() decides, among other things, which cache entries stored only in the shared index should be replaced in the new split index. Alas, this function never looks out for racily clean cache entries, and since the file's stat data in the worktree hasn't changed since the shared index was written, the entry won't be replaced in the new split index. Consequently, do_write_index() doesn't even get this racily clean cache entry, and can't smudge its stat data. Subsequent git commands will then see that the index has more recent mtime than the file and that the (not smudged) cached stat data still matches with the file in the worktree, and, ultimately, will erroneously consider the file clean. 6. Update the split index after unpack_trees() copied a racily clean cache entry from the shared index: echo "cached content" >file git update-index --split-index --add file echo "dirty worktree" >file # ... wait ... git read-tree -m HEAD This case fails due to the racy split index problem. This basically fails for the same reason as case #5 above, but there is one important difference, which warrants the dedicated test. While that second 'git update-index' in case #5 updates index_state in place, in this case 'git read-tree -m' calls unpack_trees(), which throws out the entire index, and constructs a new one from the (potentially updated) copies of the original's cache entries. Consequently, when prepare_to_write_split_index() gets to work on this reconstructed index, it takes a different code path than in case #5 when deciding which cache entries in the shared index should be replaced. The result is the same, though: the racily clean cache entry goes unnoticed, it isn't added to the split index with smudged stat data, and subsequent git commands will then erroneously consider the file clean. Note that in the last two 'test_expect_failure' cases I omitted the '#' (as in nr. of trial) from the tests' description on purpose for now, as it breakes the TAP output [2]; it will be added at the end of the series, when those two tests will be flipped to 'test_expect_success'. [1] In the branch leading to the merge commit v2.1.0-rc0~45 (Merge branch 'nd/split-index', 2014-07-16). [2] In the TAP output a '#' should separate the test's description from the TODO directive emitted by 'test_expect_failure'. The additional '#' in "#$trial" interferes with this, the test harness won't recognize the TODO directive, and will report that those tests failed unexpectedly. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-04fetch-pack: exclude blobs when lazy-fetching treesJonathan Tan
A partial clone with missing trees can be obtained using "git clone --filter=tree:none <repo>". In such a repository, when a tree needs to be lazily fetched, any tree or blob it directly or indirectly references is fetched as well, regardless of whether the original command required those objects, or if the local repository already had some of them. This is because the fetch protocol, which the lazy fetch uses, does not allow clients to request that only the wanted objects be sent, which would be the ideal solution. This patch implements a partial solution: specify the "blob:none" filter, somewhat reducing the fetch payload. This change has no effect when lazily fetching blobs (due to how filters work). And if lazily fetching a commit (such repositories are difficult to construct and is not a use case we support very well, but it is possible), referenced commits and trees are still fetched - only the blobs are not fetched. The necessary code change is done in fetch_pack() instead of somewhere closer to where the "filter" instruction is written to the wire so that only one part of the code needs to be changed in order for users of all protocol versions to benefit from this optimization. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-28t7005-editor: quote filename to fix whitespace-issueAlexander Pyhalov
Commit 4362da078e (t7005-editor: get rid of the SPACES_IN_FILENAMES prereq, 2018-05-14) removed code for detecting whether spaces in filenames work. Since we rely on spaces throughout the test suite ("trash directory.t1234-foo"), testing whether we can use the filename "e space.sh" was redundant and unnecessary. In simplifying the code, though, this introduced a regression around how spaces are handled, not in the /name/ of the editor script, but /in/ the script itself. The script just does `echo space >$1`, where $1 is for example "/foo/t/trash directory.t7005-editor/.git/COMMIT_EDITMSG". With most shells, or with Bash in posix mode, $1 will not be subjected to field splitting. But if we invoke Bash directly, which will happen if we build Git with SHELL_PATH=/bin/bash, it will detect and complain about an "ambiguous redirect". More details can be found in [1], thanks to SZEDER Gábor. Make sure that the editor script quotes "$1" to remove the ambiguity. [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180926121107.GH27036@localhost/ Signed-off-by: Alexander Pyhalov <apyhalov@gmail.com> Commit-message-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-28rev-parse: --show-superproject-working-tree should work during a mergeSam McKelvie
Invoking 'git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree' exits with "fatal: BUG: returned path string doesn't match cwd?" when the superproject has an unmerged entry for the current submodule, instead of displaying the superproject's working tree. The problem is due to the fact that when a merge of the submodule reference is in progress, "git ls-files --stage —full-name <submodule-relative-path>” returns three seperate entries for the submodule (one for each stage) rather than a single entry; e.g., $ git ls-files --stage --full-name submodule-child-test 160000 dbbd2766fa330fa741ea59bb38689fcc2d283ac5 1 submodule-child-test 160000 f174d1dbfe863a59692c3bdae730a36f2a788c51 2 submodule-child-test 160000 e6178f3a58b958543952e12824aa2106d560f21d 3 submodule-child-test The code in get_superproject_working_tree() expected exactly one entry to be returned; this patch makes it use the first entry if multiple entries are returned. Test t1500-rev-parse is extended to cover this case. Signed-off-by: Sam McKelvie <sammck@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-28t1400: drop debug `echo` to actually execute `test`Martin Ågren
Instead of running `test "foo" = "$(bar)"`, we prefix the whole thing with `echo`. Comparing to nearby tests makes it clear that this is just debug leftover. This line has actually been modified four times since it was introduced in e52290428b (General ref log reading improvements., 2006-05-19) and the `echo` has always survived. Let's finally drop it. This script could need some more cleanups. This is just an immediate fix so that we actually test what we intend to. All other hits for `git grep "\<echo test " -- t/` seem fine. They want to create some input or expected output data. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-28t1700-split-index: document why FSMONITOR is disabled in this test scriptSZEDER Gábor
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-27commit: fix erroneous BUG, 'multiple renames on the same target? how?'Elijah Newren
builtin/commit.c:prepare_to_commit() can call run_status() twice if using the editor, including status, and the user attempts to record a non-merge empty commit without explicit --allow-empty. If there is also a rename involved as well (due to using 'git add -N'), then a BUG in wt-status.c is triggered: BUG: wt-status.c:476: multiple renames on the same target? how? The reason we hit this bug is that both run_status() calls use the same struct wt_status * (named s), and s->change is not freed between runs. Changes are inserted into s with string_list_insert, which usually means that the second run just recomputes all the same results and overwrites what was computed the first time. However, ever since commit 176ea7479309 ("wt-status.c: handle worktree renames", 2017-12-27), wt-status started checking for renames and copies but also added a preventative check that d->rename_status wasn't already set and output a BUG message if it was. The problem isn't that there are multiple rename targets to a single path as the error implies, the problem is that 's' is not freed/cleared between the two run_status() calls. Ever since commit dc6b1d92ca9c ("wt-status: use settings from git_diff_ui_config", 2018-05-04), which stopped hardcoding DIFF_DETECT_RENAME and allowed users to ask for copy detection, this bug has also been triggerable with a copy instead of a rename. Fix the bug by clearing s->change. A better change might be to clean up all of s between the two run_status() calls. A good first step towards such a goal might be writing a function to free the necessary fields in the wt_status * struct; a cursory glance at the code suggests all of its allocated data is probably leaked. However, doing all that cleanup is a bigger task for someone else interested to tackle; just fix the bug for now. Reported-by: Andrea Stacchiotti <andreastacchiotti@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-27Sync with 2.18.1Junio C Hamano
* maint-2.18: Git 2.18.1 Git 2.17.2 fsck: detect submodule paths starting with dash fsck: detect submodule urls starting with dash Git 2.16.5 Git 2.15.3 Git 2.14.5 submodule-config: ban submodule paths that start with a dash submodule-config: ban submodule urls that start with dash submodule--helper: use "--" to signal end of clone options
2018-09-27Sync with 2.17.2Junio C Hamano
* maint-2.17: Git 2.17.2 fsck: detect submodule paths starting with dash fsck: detect submodule urls starting with dash Git 2.16.5 Git 2.15.3 Git 2.14.5 submodule-config: ban submodule paths that start with a dash submodule-config: ban submodule urls that start with dash submodule--helper: use "--" to signal end of clone options
2018-09-27fsck: detect submodule paths starting with dashJeff King
As with urls, submodule paths with dashes are ignored by git, but may end up confusing older versions. Detecting them via fsck lets us prevent modern versions of git from being a vector to spread broken .gitmodules to older versions. Compared to blocking leading-dash urls, though, this detection may be less of a good idea: 1. While such paths provide confusing and broken results, they don't seem to actually work as option injections against anything except "cd". In particular, the submodule code seems to canonicalize to an absolute path before running "git clone" (so it passes /your/clone/-sub). 2. It's more likely that we may one day make such names actually work correctly. Even after we revert this fsck check, it will continue to be a hassle until hosting servers are all updated. On the other hand, it's not entirely clear that the behavior in older versions is safe. And if we do want to eventually allow this, we may end up doing so with a special syntax anyway (e.g., writing "./-sub" in the .gitmodules file, and teaching the submodule code to canonicalize it when comparing). So on balance, this is probably a good protection. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-27fsck: detect submodule urls starting with dashJeff King
Urls with leading dashes can cause mischief on older versions of Git. We should detect them so that they can be rejected by receive.fsckObjects, preventing modern versions of git from being a vector by which attacks can spread. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-27Sync with 2.16.5Junio C Hamano
* maint-2.16: Git 2.16.5 Git 2.15.3 Git 2.14.5 submodule-config: ban submodule paths that start with a dash submodule-config: ban submodule urls that start with dash submodule--helper: use "--" to signal end of clone options
2018-09-27Sync with 2.15.3Junio C Hamano
* maint-2.15: Git 2.15.3 Git 2.14.5 submodule-config: ban submodule paths that start with a dash submodule-config: ban submodule urls that start with dash submodule--helper: use "--" to signal end of clone options
2018-09-27Sync with Git 2.14.4Junio C Hamano
* maint-2.14: Git 2.14.5 submodule-config: ban submodule paths that start with a dash submodule-config: ban submodule urls that start with dash submodule--helper: use "--" to signal end of clone options
2018-09-27submodule-config: ban submodule paths that start with a dashJeff King
We recently banned submodule urls that look like command-line options. This is the matching change to ban leading-dash paths. As with the urls, this should not break any use cases that currently work. Even with our "--" separator passed to git-clone, git-submodule.sh gets confused. Without the code portion of this patch, the clone of "-sub" added in t7417 would yield results like: /path/to/git-submodule: 410: cd: Illegal option -s /path/to/git-submodule: 417: cd: Illegal option -s /path/to/git-submodule: 410: cd: Illegal option -s /path/to/git-submodule: 417: cd: Illegal option -s Fetched in submodule path '-sub', but it did not contain b56243f8f4eb91b2f1f8109452e659f14dd3fbe4. Direct fetching of that commit failed. Moreover, naively adding such a submodule doesn't work: $ git submodule add $url -sub The following path is ignored by one of your .gitignore files: -sub even though there is no such ignore pattern (the test script hacks around this with a well-placed "git mv"). Unlike leading-dash urls, though, it's possible that such a path _could_ be useful if we eventually made it work. So this commit should be seen not as recommending a particular policy, but rather temporarily closing off a broken and possibly dangerous code-path. We may revisit this decision later. There are two minor differences to the tests in t7416 (that covered urls): 1. We don't have a "./-sub" escape hatch to make this work, since the submodule code expects to be able to match canonical index names to the path field (so you are free to add submodule config with that path, but we would never actually use it, since an index entry would never start with "./"). 2. After this patch, cloning actually succeeds. Since we ignore the submodule.*.path value, we fail to find a config stanza for our submodule at all, and simply treat it as inactive. We still check for the "ignoring" message. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-27submodule-config: ban submodule urls that start with dashJeff King
The previous commit taught the submodule code to invoke our "git clone $url $path" with a "--" separator so that we aren't confused by urls or paths that start with dashes. However, that's just one code path. It's not clear if there are others, and it would be an easy mistake to add one in the future. Moreover, even with the fix in the previous commit, it's quite hard to actually do anything useful with such an entry. Any url starting with a dash must fall into one of three categories: - it's meant as a file url, like "-path". But then any clone is not going to have the matching path, since it's by definition relative inside the newly created clone. If you spell it as "./-path", the submodule code sees the "/" and translates this to an absolute path, so it at least works (assuming the receiver has the same filesystem layout as you). But that trick does not apply for a bare "-path". - it's meant as an ssh url, like "-host:path". But this already doesn't work, as we explicitly disallow ssh hostnames that begin with a dash (to avoid option injection against ssh). - it's a remote-helper scheme, like "-scheme::data". This _could_ work if the receiver bends over backwards and creates a funny-named helper like "git-remote--scheme". But normally there would not be any helper that matches. Since such a url does not work today and is not likely to do anything useful in the future, let's simply disallow them entirely. That protects the existing "git clone" path (in a belt-and-suspenders way), along with any others that might exist. Our tests cover two cases: 1. A file url with "./" continues to work, showing that there's an escape hatch for people with truly silly repo names. 2. A url starting with "-" is rejected. Note that we expect case (2) to fail, but it would have done so even without this commit, for the reasons given above. So instead of just expecting failure, let's also check for the magic word "ignoring" on stderr. That lets us know that we failed for the right reason. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>