summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t6040-tracking-info.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-01-24status: support --no-ahead-behind in long formatJeff Hostetler
Teach long (normal) status format to respect the --no-ahead-behind parameter and skip the possibly expensive ahead/behind computation between the branch and the upstream. Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-01-24status: update short status to respect --no-ahead-behindJeff Hostetler
Teach "git status --short --branch" to respect "--no-ahead-behind" parameter to skip computing ahead/behind counts for the branch and its upstream and just report '[different]'. Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-10Merge branch 'ma/up-to-date'Junio C Hamano
Message and doc updates. * ma/up-to-date: treewide: correct several "up-to-date" to "up to date" Documentation/user-manual: update outdated example output
2017-08-23treewide: correct several "up-to-date" to "up to date"Martin Ågren
Follow the Oxford style, which says to use "up-to-date" before the noun, but "up to date" after it. Don't change plumbing (specifically send-pack.c, but transport.c (git push) also has the same string). This was produced by grepping for "up-to-date" and "up to date". It turned out we only had to edit in one direction, removing the hyphens. Fix a typo in Documentation/git-diff-index.txt while we're there. Reported-by: Jeffrey Manian <jeffrey.manian@gmail.com> Reported-by: STEVEN WHITE <stevencharleswhitevoices@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-17builtin/branch: stop supporting the "--set-upstream" optionKaartic Sivaraam
The '--set-upstream' option of branch was deprecated in b347d06b ("branch: deprecate --set-upstream and show help if we detect possible mistaken use", 2012-08-30) and has been planned for removal ever since. In order to prevent "--set-upstream" on a command line from being taken as an abbreviated form of "--set-upstream-to", explicitly catch "--set-upstream" option and die, instead of just removing it from the list of options. Before this change, an attempt to use "--set-upstream" resulted in: $ git branch * master $ git branch --set-upstream origin/master The --set-upstream flag is deprecated and will be removed. Consider using --track or --set-upstream-to Branch origin/master set up to track local branch master. $ echo $? 0 $ git branch * master origin/master With this change, the behaviour becomes like this: $ git branch * master $ git branch --set-upstream origin/master fatal: the '--set-upstream' option is no longer supported. Please use '--track' or '--set-upstream-to' instead. $ echo $? 128 $ git branch * master Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-01-31branch: use ref-filter printing APIsKarthik Nayak
Port branch.c to use ref-filter APIs for printing. This clears out most of the code used in branch.c for printing and replaces them with calls made to the ref-filter library. Introduce build_format() which gets the format required for printing of refs. Make amendments to print_ref_list() to reflect these changes. The strings included in build_format() may not be safely quoted for inclusion (i.e. it might contain '%' which needs to be escaped with an additional '%'). Introduce quote_literal_for_format() as a helper function which takes a string and returns a version of the string that is safely quoted to be used in the for-each-ref format which is built in build_format(). Change calc_maxwidth() to also account for the length of HEAD ref, by calling ref-filter:get_head_discription(). Also change the test in t6040 to reflect the changes. Before this patch, all cross-prefix symrefs weren't shortened. Since we're using ref-filter APIs, we shorten all symrefs by default. We also allow the user to change the format if needed with the introduction of the '--format' option in the next patch. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> Mentored-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-25t: fix some trivial cases of ignored exit codes in loopsJeff King
These are all cases where we do a setup step of the form: for i in $foo; do set_up $i || break done && more_setup would not notice a failure in set_up (because break always returns a 0 exit code). These are just setup steps that we do not expect to fail, but it does not hurt to be defensive. Most can be fixed by converting the "break" to a "return 1" (since we eval our tests inside a function for just this purpose). A few of the loops are inside subshells, so we can use just "exit 1" to break out of the subshell. And a few can actually be made shorter by just unrolling the loop. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-11-18branch: fix --verbose output column alignmentTorstein Hegge
Commit f2e0873 (branch: report invalid tracking branch as gone) removed an early return from fill_tracking_info() in the path taken when 'git branch -v' lists a branch in sync with its upstream. This resulted in an unconditionally added space in front of the subject line: $ git branch -v * master f5eb3da commit pushed to upstream topic f935eb6 unpublished topic Instead, only add the trailing space if a decoration have been added. To catch this kind of whitespace breakage in the tests, be a bit less smart when filtering the output through sed. Signed-off-by: Torstein Hegge <hegge@resisty.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-26status: always show tracking branch even no changeJiang Xin
In order to see what the current branch is tracking, one way is using "git branch -v -v", but branches other than the current are also reported. Another way is using "git status", such as: $ git status # On branch master # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit. ... But this will not work if there is no change between the current branch and its upstream. Always report upstream tracking info even if there is no difference, so that "git status" is consistent for checking tracking info for current branch. E.g. $ git status # On branch feature1 # Your branch is up-to-date with 'github/feature1'. ... $ git status -bs ## feature1...github/feature1 ... $ git checkout feature1 Already on 'feature1' Your branch is up-to-date with 'github/feature1'. ... Also add some test cases in t6040. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-26branch: report invalid tracking branch as goneJiang Xin
Command "git branch -vv" will report tracking branches, but invalid tracking branches are also reported. This is because the function stat_tracking_info() can not distinguish invalid tracking branch from other cases which it would not like to report, such as there is no upstream settings at all, or nothing is changed between one branch and its upstream. Junio suggested missing upstream should be reported [1] like: $ git branch -v -v master e67ac84 initial * topic 3fc0f2a [topicbase: gone] topic $ git status # On branch topic # Your branch is based on 'topicbase', but the upstream is gone. # (use "git branch --unset-upstream" to fixup) ... $ git status -b -s ## topic...topicbase [gone] ... In order to do like that, we need to distinguish these three cases (i.e. no tracking, with configured but no longer valid tracking, and with tracking) in function stat_tracking_info(). So the refactored function stat_tracking_info() has three return values: -1 (with "gone" base), 0 (no base), and 1 (with base). If the caller does not like to report tracking info when nothing changed between the branch and its upstream, simply checks if num_theirs and num_ours are both 0. [1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/231830/focus=232288 Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-14test: do not rely on US English tracking-info messagesJonathan Nieder
When v1.7.9.2~28^2 (2012-02-02) marked "Your branch is behind" and friends for translation, it forgot to adjust tests not to check those messages when tests are being run with git configured to write its output in another language. With this patch applied, t2020 and t6040 pass again with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Explained-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-05Merge branch 'mg/branch-list'Junio C Hamano
* mg/branch-list: t3200: clean up checks for file existence branch: -v does not automatically imply --list branch: allow pattern arguments branch: introduce --list option git-branch: introduce missing long forms for the options git-tag: introduce long forms for the options t6040: test branch -vv Conflicts: Documentation/git-tag.txt t/t3200-branch.sh
2011-08-26t6040: test branch -vvMichael J Gruber
t6040 has a test for 'git branch -v' but not for 'git branch -vv'. Add one. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-19branch.c: use the parsed branch nameMichael J Gruber
When setting up tracking info, branch.c uses the given branch specifier ("name"). Use the parsed name ("ref.buf") instead so that git branch --set-upstream @{-1} foo sets up tracking info for the previous branch rather than for a branch named "@{-1}". Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-13i18n: use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep in t5541, t6040, t6120, t7004, ↵Junio C Hamano
t7012 and t7060 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-02Merge branch 'ab/i18n-st'Junio C Hamano
* ab/i18n-st: (69 commits) i18n: git-shortlog basic messages i18n: git-revert split up "could not revert/apply" message i18n: git-revert literal "me" messages i18n: git-revert "Your local changes" message i18n: git-revert basic messages i18n: git-notes GIT_NOTES_REWRITE_MODE error message i18n: git-notes basic commands i18n: git-gc "Auto packing the repository" message i18n: git-gc basic messages i18n: git-describe basic messages i18n: git-clean clean.requireForce messages i18n: git-clean basic messages i18n: git-bundle basic messages i18n: git-archive basic messages i18n: git-status "renamed: " message i18n: git-status "Initial commit" message i18n: git-status "Changes to be committed" message i18n: git-status shortstatus messages i18n: git-status "nothing to commit" messages i18n: git-status basic messages ... Conflicts: builtin/branch.c builtin/checkout.c builtin/clone.c builtin/commit.c builtin/grep.c builtin/merge.c builtin/push.c builtin/revert.c t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh t/t7607-merge-overwrite.sh
2011-03-15Merge branch 'jh/maint-do-not-track-non-branches'Junio C Hamano
* jh/maint-do-not-track-non-branches: branch/checkout --track: Ensure that upstream branch is indeed a branch
2011-03-10i18n: git-branch "git branch -v" messagesÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Make the "git branch -v" messages translatable, e.g.: 5054b57 [ahead 8] branch error fixup This is possibly a plumbing message. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-17branch/checkout --track: Ensure that upstream branch is indeed a branchJohan Herland
When creating a new branch using the --track option, we must make sure that we don't try to set an upstream that does not make sense to follow (using 'git pull') or update (using 'git push'). The current code checks against using HEAD as upstream (since tracking a symref doesn't make sense). However, tracking a tag doesn't make sense either. Indeed, tracking _any_ ref that is not a (local or remote) branch doesn't make sense, and should be disallowed. This patch achieves this by checking that the ref we're trying to --track resides within refs/heads/* or refs/remotes/*. This new check replaces the previous check against HEAD. A couple of testcases are also added, verifying that we cannot create branches with tags as upstreams. Finally, some selftests relying on using a non-branch as an upstream have been reworked or removed: - t6040: Reverse the meaning of two tests that depend on the ability to use (lightweight and annotated) tags as upstreams. These two tests were originally added in commits 1be570f and 57ffc5f, and this patch reverts the intention of those two commits. - t7201: Remove part of a test (introduced in 9188ed8) relying on a non-branch as upstream. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Jonathan Nieder
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-19Add branch --set-upstreamIlari Liusvaara
Add --set-upstream option to branch that works like --track, except that when branch exists already, its upstream info is changed without changing the ref value. Based-on-patch-from: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-22git status: not "commit --dry-run" anymoreJunio C Hamano
This removes tentative "git stat" and make it take over "git status". There are some tests that expect "git status" to exit with non-zero status when there is something staged. Some tests expect "git status path..." to show the status for a partial commit. For these, replace "git status" with "git commit --dry-run". For the ones that do not attempt a dry-run of a partial commit that check the output from the command, check the output from "git status" as well, as they should be identical. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-23Merge branch 'mg/track'Junio C Hamano
* mg/track: Fix behavior with non-commit upstream references Test tracking of non-commit upstreams
2009-05-14Fix behavior with non-commit upstream referencesMichael J Gruber
stat_tracking_info() assumes that upstream references (as specified by --track or set up automatically) are commits. By calling lookup_commit() on them, create_objects() creates objects for them with type commit no matter what their real type is; this disturbs lookup_tag() later on in the call sequence, leading to git status, git branch -v and git checkout erroring out. Fix this by using lookup_commit_reference() instead so that (annotated) tags can be used as upstream references. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-14Test tracking of non-commit upstreamsMichael J Gruber
git-checkout and git-branch allow setting up an arbitrary committish as the upstream reference for --track. In particular, tags are allowed. But they and git-status barf on non-commit upstreams as soon as they are asked for trackings stats. Expose this shortcoming by adding two tests: annotated tags are affected but lightweight tags are OK. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-01Make local branches behave like remote branches when --trackedMichael J Gruber
This makes sure that local branches, when followed using --track, behave the same as remote ones (e.g. differences being reported by git status and git checkout). This fixes 1 known failure. The fix is done within branch_get(): The first natural candidate, namely remote_find_tracking(), does not have all the necessary info because in general there is no remote struct for '.', and we don't want one because it would show up in other places as well. branch_get(), on the other hand, has access to merge_names[] (in addition to merge[]) and therefore can set up the followed branch easily. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-27Test for local branches being followed with --trackMichael J Gruber
According to the documentation, it is perfectly okay to follow local branches using the --track option. Introduce a test which checks whether they behave the same. Currently one test fails. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-30tests: grep portability fixesJeff King
We try to avoid using the "-q" or "-e" options, as they are largely useless, as explained in aadbe44f. There is one exception for "-e" here, which is in t7701 used to produce an "or" of patterns. This can be rewritten as an egrep pattern. This patch also removes use of "grep -F" in favor of the more widely available "fgrep". [sp: Tested on AIX 5.3 by Mike Ralphson, Tested on MinGW by Johannes Sixt] Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Tested-by: Mike Ralphson <mike@abacus.co.uk> Tested-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-07-03stat_tracking_info(): clear object flags used during countingJunio C Hamano
When left-right traversal counts the commits in a diverged history, it leaves the flags in the commits smudged, and we need to clear them before we return. Otherwise the caller cannot inspect other branches with this function again. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>