| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The documentation in gitremote-helpers.txt claims that after a helper
has advertised the "object-format" capability, Git may then send "option
object-format true" to indicate that it would like to hear which object
format the helper is using when it returns refs.
However, the code implementing this has always written just "option
object-format", without the extra "true" value. Nobody noticed in
practice or in the tests because the only two helpers we ship are:
- remote-curl, which quietly converts missing values into "true". This
goes all the way back to ef08ef9ea0 (remote-helpers: Support custom
transport options, 2009-10-30), despite the fact that I don't think
any other option has ever made use of it.
- remote-testgit in t5801 does insist on having a "true" value. But
since it sends the ":object-format" response regardless of whether
it thinks the caller asked for it (technically breaking protocol),
everything just works, albeit with an extra shell error:
.../git/t/t5801/git-remote-testgit: 150: test: =: unexpected operator
printed to stderr, which you can see running t5801 with --verbose.
(The problem is that $val is the empty string, and since we don't
double-quote it in "test $val = true", we invoke "test = true"
instead).
When the documentation and code do not match, it is often good to fix
the documentation rather than break compatibility. And in this case, we
have had the mis-match since 8b85ee4f47 (transport-helper: implement
object-format extensions, 2020-05-25). However, the sha256 feature was
listed as experimental until 8e42eb0e9a (doc: sha256 is no longer
experimental, 2023-07-31).
It's possible there are some third party helpers that tried to follow
the documentation, and are broken. Changing the code will fix them. It's
also possible that there are ones that follow the code and will be
broken if we change it. I suspect neither is the case given that no
helper authors have brought this up as an issue (I only noticed it
because I was running t5801 in verbose mode for other reasons and
wondered about the weird shell error). That, coupled with the relative
new-ness of sha256, makes me think nobody has really worked on helpers
for it yet, which gives us an opportunity to correct the code before too
much time passes.
And doing so has some value: it brings "object-format" in line with the
syntax of other options, making the protocol more consistent. It also
lets us use set_helper_option(), which has better error reporting.
Note that we don't really need to allow any other values like "false"
here. The point is for Git to tell the helper that it understands
":object-format" lines coming back as part of the ref listing. There's
no point in future versions saying "no, I don't understand that".
To make sure everything works as expected, we can improve the
remote-testgit helper from t5801 to send the ":object-format" line only
if the other side correctly asked for it (which modern Git will always
do). With that test change and without the matching code fix here, t5801
will fail when run with GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In 18c9cb7524 (builtin/clone: create the refdb with the correct object
format, 2023-12-12), we have changed git-clone(1) so that it delays
creation of the refdb until after it has learned about the remote's
object format. This change was required for the reftable backend, which
encodes the object format into the tables. So if we pre-initialized the
refdb with the default object format, but the remote uses a different
object format than that, then the resulting tables would have encoded
the wrong object format.
This change unfortunately breaks remote helpers which try to access the
repository that is about to be created. Because the refdb has not yet
been initialized at the point where we spawn the remote helper, we also
don't yet have "HEAD" or "refs/". Consequently, any Git commands ran by
the remote helper which try to access the repository would fail because
it cannot be discovered.
This is essentially a chicken-and-egg problem: we cannot initialize the
refdb because we don't know about the object format. But we cannot learn
about the object format because the remote helper may be unable to
access the partially-initialized repository.
Ideally, we would address this issue via capabilities. But the remote
helper protocol is not structured in a way that guarantees that the
capability announcement happens before the remote helper tries to access
the repository.
Instead, fix this issue by partially initializing the refdb up to the
point where it becomes discoverable by Git commands.
Reported-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When using an algorithm other than SHA-1, we need the remote helper to
advertise support for the object-format extension and provide
information back to us so that we can properly parse refs and return
data. Ensure that the test remote helper understands these extensions.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Code restructuring during 2.20 period broke fetching tags via
"import" based transports.
* fc/fetch-with-import-fix:
fetch: fix regression with transport helpers
fetch: make the code more understandable
fetch: trivial cleanup
t5801 (remote-helpers): add test to fetch tags
t5801 (remote-helpers): cleanup refspec stuff
|
|
The `git-remote-testgit` script is really only used in
`t5801-remote-helpers.sh`. It does not even contain any `@@<MAGIC>@@`
placeholders that would need to be interpolated via `make
git-remote-testgit`.
Let's just move it to a new home, decluttering the top-level directory
and clarifying that this is just a test helper, not an official Git
command that we would want to ever support.
Suggested by Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
