summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5533-push-cas.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-11-19t55[23]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin
Carefully excluding t5526, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we use `main` as the default branch name in t55[23]*. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -e 's/naster/nain/g' -- \ t55[23]*.sh && git checkout HEAD -- t5526\*) Note that t5533 contains a variation of the name `master` (`naster`) that we rename here, too. This commit allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for that range of tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Johannes Schindelin
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-03t, doc: update tests, reference for "--force-if-includes"Srinidhi Kaushik
Update test cases for the new option, and document its usage and update related references. Update test cases for the new option, and document its usage and update related references. - t/t5533-push-cas.sh: Update test cases for "compare-and-swap" when used along with "--force-if-includes" helps mitigate overwrites when remote refs are updated in the background; allows forced updates when changes from remote are integrated locally. - Documentation: Add reference for the new option, configuration setting ("push.useForceIfIncludes") and advise messages. Signed-off-by: Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-30tests: make use of the test_must_be_empty functionÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Change various tests that use an idiom of the form: >expect && test_cmp expect actual To instead use: test_must_be_empty actual The test_must_be_empty() wrapper was introduced in ca8d148daf ("test: test_must_be_empty helper", 2013-06-09). Many of these tests have been added after that time. This was mostly found with, and manually pruned from: git grep '^\s+>.*expect.* &&$' t Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-04-20push: document & test --force-with-lease with multiple remotesÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Document & test for cases where there are two remotes pointing to the same URL, and a background fetch & subsequent `git push --force-with-lease` shouldn't clobber un-updated references we haven't fetched. Some editors like Microsoft's VSC have a feature to auto-fetch in the background, this bypasses the protections offered by --force-with-lease & --force-with-lease=<refname>, as noted in the documentation being added here. See the 'Tools that do an automatic fetch defeat "git push --force-with-lease"' (<1491617750.2149.10.camel@mattmccutchen.net>) git mailing list thread for more details. Jakub Narębski suggested this method of adding another remote to bypass this edge case, document that & add a test for it. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-08-04t5533: make it pass on case-sensitive filesystemsJohannes Schindelin
The newly-added test case wants to commit a file "c.t" (note the lower case) when a previous test case already committed a file "C.t". This confuses Git to the point that it thinks "c.t" was not staged when "git add c.t" was called. Simply make the naming of the test commits consistent with the previous test cases: use upper-case, and advance in the alphabet. This came up in local work to rebase the Windows-specific patches to the current `next` branch. An identical fix was suggested by John Keeping. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-07-26push: allow pushing new branches with --force-with-leaseJohn Keeping
If there is no upstream information for a branch, it is likely that it is newly created and can safely be pushed under the normal fast-forward rules. Relax the --force-with-lease check so that we do not reject these branches immediately but rather attempt to push them as new branches, using the null SHA-1 as the expected value. In fact, it is already possible to push new branches using the explicit --force-with-lease=<branch>:<expect> syntax, so all we do here is make this behaviour the default if no explicit "expect" value is specified. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-07-26push: add shorthand for --force-with-lease branch creationJohn Keeping
Allow the empty string to stand in for the null SHA-1 when pushing a new branch, like we do when deleting branches. This means that the following command ensures that `new-branch` is created on the remote (that is, is must not already exist): git push --force-with-lease=new-branch: origin new-branch Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-01push: fix ref status reporting for --force-with-leaseAndrew Wheeler
The --force--with-lease push option leads to less detailed status information than --force. In particular, the output indicates that a reference was fast-forwarded, even when it was force-updated. Modify the --force-with-lease ref status logic to leverage the --force ref status logic when the "lease" conditions are met. Also, enhance tests to validate output status reporting. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wheeler <awheeler@motorola.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t: avoid using ":" for commentsJeff King
The ":" is not a comment marker, but rather a noop command. Using it as a comment like: : do something cmd1 && : something else cmd2 breaks the &&-chain, and we would fail to notice if "cmd1" failed in this instance. We can just use regular "#" comments instead. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t: fix trivial &&-chain breakageJeff King
These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, but during a setup phase. We may fail to notice failure in commands that build the test environment, but these are typically not expected to fail at all (but it's still good to double-check that our test environment is what we expect). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-23t5533: test "push --force-with-lease"Junio C Hamano
Prepare two repositories, src and dst, the latter of which is a clone of the former (with tracking branches), and push from the latter into the former, with various --force-with-lease options. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>