summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t5531-deep-submodule-push.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-11-19t55[23]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin
Carefully excluding t5526, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we use `main` as the default branch name in t55[23]*. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -e 's/naster/nain/g' -- \ t55[23]*.sh && git checkout HEAD -- t5526\*) Note that t5533 contains a variation of the name `master` (`naster`) that we rename here, too. This commit allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for that range of tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Johannes Schindelin
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-02t5531: avoid using an abbreviated optionJohannes Schindelin
It was probably just an oversight: the `--recurse-submodules` option puts the term "submodules" in the plural form, not the singular one. To avoid future problems in case that another option is introduced that starts with the prefix `--recurse-submodule`, let's just fix this. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-07-16t5000-t5999: fix broken &&-chainsEric Sunshine
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-14push, fetch: error out for submodule entries not pointing to commitsStefan Beller
The check_has_commit helper uses resolves a submodule entry to a commit, when validating its existence. As a side effect this means tolerates a submodule entry pointing to a tag, which is not a valid submodule entry that git commands would know how to cope with. Tighten the check to require an actual commit, not a tag pointing to a commit. Also improve the error handling when a submodule entry points to non-commit (e.g., a blob) to error out instead of warning and pretending the pointed to object doesn't exist. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-22Merge branch 'bw/push-options-recursively-to-submodules'Junio C Hamano
"git push --recurse-submodules $there HEAD:$target" was not propagated down to the submodules, but now it is. * bw/push-options-recursively-to-submodules: submodule--helper: teach push-check to handle HEAD
2017-07-20submodule--helper: teach push-check to handle HEADBrandon Williams
In 06bf4ad1d (push: propagate remote and refspec with --recurse-submodules) push was taught how to propagate a refspec down to submodules when the '--recurse-submodules' flag is given. The only refspecs that are allowed to be propagated are ones which name a ref which exists in both the superproject and the submodule, with the caveat that 'HEAD' was disallowed. This patch teaches push-check (the submodule helper which determines if a refspec can be propagated to a submodule) to permit propagating 'HEAD' if and only if the superproject and the submodule both have the same named branch checked out and the submodule is not in a detached head state. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-06-13Merge branch 'sb/submodule-blanket-recursive'Junio C Hamano
Many commands learned to pay attention to submodule.recurse configuration. * sb/submodule-blanket-recursive: builtin/fetch.c: respect 'submodule.recurse' option builtin/push.c: respect 'submodule.recurse' option builtin/grep.c: respect 'submodule.recurse' option Introduce 'submodule.recurse' option for worktree manipulators submodule loading: separate code path for .gitmodules and config overlay reset/checkout/read-tree: unify config callback for submodule recursion submodule test invocation: only pass additional arguments submodule recursing: do not write a config variable twice
2017-06-02Merge branch 'sb/t5531-update-desc'Junio C Hamano
The description strings for a few tests have been updated. * sb/t5531-update-desc: t5531: fix test description
2017-06-01builtin/push.c: respect 'submodule.recurse' optionStefan Beller
The closest mapping from the boolean 'submodule.recurse' set to "yes" to the variety of submodule push modes is "on-demand", so implement that. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-23t5531: fix test descriptionStefan Beller
The description of the test was not enclosed in single quotes, which broke the coloring scheme that I am used to. Upon closer inspection the test is good, but the description is a bit vague. So extend the description of the first test. While at it align the description of the file to match what we actually test in the file. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-04-11push: propagate remote and refspec with --recurse-submodulesBrandon Williams
Teach "push --recurse-submodules" to propagate, if given a name as remote, the provided remote and refspec recursively to the pushes performed in the submodules. The push will therefore only succeed if all submodules have a remote with such a name configured. Note that "push --recurse-submodules" with a path or URL as remote will not propagate the remote or refspec and instead use the default remote and refspec configured in the submodule, preserving the current behavior. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-12-20push: add option to push only submodulesBrandon Williams
Teach push the --recurse-submodules=only option. This enables push to recursively push all unpushed submodules while leaving the superproject unpushed. This is a desirable feature in a scenario where updates to the superproject are handled automatically by some other means, perhaps a tool like Gerrit code review. In this scenario, a developer could make a change which spans multiple submodules and then push their commits for code review. Upon completion of the code review, their commits can be accepted and applied to their respective submodules while the code review tool can then automatically update the superproject to the most recent SHA1 of each submodule. This would reduce the merge conflicts in the superproject that could occur if multiple people are contributing to the same submodule. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-11-23push: fix --dry-run to not push submodulesBrandon Williams
Teach push to respect the --dry-run option when configured to recursively push submodules 'on-demand'. This is done by passing the --dry-run flag to the child process which performs a push for a submodules when performing a dry-run. In order to preserve good user experience, the additional check for unpushed submodules is skipped during a dry-run when --recurse-submodules=on-demand. The check is skipped because the submodule pushes were performed as dry-runs and this check would always fail as the submodules would still need to be pushed. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-11-23push: --dry-run updates submodules when --recurse-submodules=on-demandBrandon Williams
This patch adds a test to illustrate how push run with --dry-run doesn't actually perform a dry-run when push is configured to push submodules on-demand. Instead all submodules which need to be pushed are actually pushed to their remotes while any updates for the superproject are performed as a dry-run. This is a bug and not the intended behaviour of a dry-run. Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-04push: follow the "last one wins" convention for --recurse-submodulesMike Crowe
Use the "last one wins" convention for --recurse-submodules rather than treating conflicting options as an error. Also, fix the declaration of the file-scope recurse_submodules global variable to put it on a separate line. Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-12-04push: test that --recurse-submodules on command line overrides configMike Crowe
t5531 only checked that the push.recurseSubmodules config option was overridden by passing --recurse-submodules=check on the command line. Add new tests for overriding with --recurse-submodules=no, --no-recurse-submodules and --recurse-submodules=push too. Also correct minor typo in test commit message. Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-11-20push: add recurseSubmodules config optionMike Crowe
The --recurse-submodules command line parameter has existed for some time but it has no config file equivalent. Following the style of the corresponding parameter for git fetch, let's invent push.recurseSubmodules to provide a default for this parameter. This also requires the addition of --recurse-submodules=no to allow the configuration to be overridden on the command line when required. The most straightforward way to implement this appears to be to make push use code in submodule-config in a similar way to fetch. Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2015-03-20t: fix trivial &&-chain breakageJeff King
These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain, but during a setup phase. We may fail to notice failure in commands that build the test environment, but these are typically not expected to fail at all (but it's still good to double-check that our test environment is what we expect). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-13t5531: further "matching" fixupsJeff King
Commit 43eb920 switched one of the sub-repository in this test to matching to prepare for a world where the default becomes "simple". However, the main repository needs a similar change. We did not notice any test failure when merged with b2ed944 (push: switch default from "matching" to "simple", 2013-01-04) because t5531.6 is trying to provoke a failure of "git push" due to a submodule check. When combined with b2ed944 the push still fails, but for the wrong reason (because our upstream setup does not exist, not because of the submodule). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-05t5531: do not assume the "matching" push is the defaultJunio C Hamano
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-30push: teach --recurse-submodules the on-demand optionHeiko Voigt
When using this option git will search for all submodules that have changed in the revisions to be send. It will then try to push the currently checked out branch of each submodule. This helps when a user has finished working on a change which involves submodules and just wants to push everything in one go. Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-21push: Don't push a repository with unpushed submodulesFredrik Gustafsson
When working with submodules it is easy to forget to push a submodule to the server but pushing a super-project that contains a commit for that submodule. The result is that the superproject points at a submodule commit that is not available on the server. This adds the option --recurse-submodules=check to push. When using this option git will check that all submodule commits that are about to be pushed are present on a remote of the submodule. To be able to use a combined diff, disabling a diff callback has been removed from combined-diff.c. Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Jonathan Nieder
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-02tests: make all test files executableMark Rada
For consistency with the rest of the test files. Signed-off-by: Mark Rada <marada@uwaterloo.ca> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
2009-08-14Fix "unpack-objects --strict"Junio C Hamano
When unpack-objects is run under the --strict option, objects that have pointers to other objects are verified for the reachability at the end, by calling check_object() on each of them, and letting check_object to walk the reachable objects from them using fsck_walk() recursively. The function however misunderstands the semantics of fsck_walk() function when it makes a call to it, setting itself as the callback. fsck_walk() expects the callback function to return a non-zero value to signal an error (negative value causes an immediate abort, positive value is still an error but allows further checks on sibling objects) and return zero to signal a success. The function however returned 1 on some non error cases, and to cover up this mistake, complained only when fsck_walk() did not detect any error. To fix this double-bug, make the function return zero on all success cases, and also check for non-zero return from fsck_walk() for an error. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>