| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
"git rebase --rebase-merges" learned to drive different merge
strategies and pass strategy specific options to them.
* js/rebase-r-strategy:
t3427: accelerate this test by using fast-export and fast-import
rebase -r: do not (re-)generate root commits with `--root` *and* `--onto`
t3418: test `rebase -r` with merge strategies
t/lib-rebase: prepare for testing `git rebase --rebase-merges`
rebase -r: support merge strategies other than `recursive`
t3427: fix another incorrect assumption
t3427: accommodate for the `rebase --merge` backend having been replaced
t3427: fix erroneous assumption
t3427: condense the unnecessarily repetitive test cases into three
t3427: move the `filter-branch` invocation into the `setup` case
t3427: simplify the `setup` test case significantly
t3427: add a clarifying comment
rebase: fold git-rebase--common into the -p backend
sequencer: the `am` and `rebase--interactive` scripts are gone
.gitignore: there is no longer a built-in `git-rebase--interactive`
t3400: stop referring to the scripted rebase
Drop unused git-rebase--am.sh
|
|
There is a test case in this script that verifies that `git rebase
--preserve-merges` works all right with non-default merge strategies or
non-default merge strategy options.
Now that `git rebase --rebase-merges` learned about merge strategies,
let's copy-edit this test case to verify that that works as intended,
too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The `exec` command is specific to the interactive backend, therefore it
does not make sense for non-interactive rebases to heed that config
setting.
We still want to error out if a non-interactive rebase is started with
`--reschedule-failed-exec`, of course.
Reported by Vas Sudanagunta via:
https://github.com/git/git/commit/969de3ff0e0#commitcomment-33257187
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
This patch was contributed only as a tentative "we could introduce a
convenient short option if we do not want to change the default behavior
in the long run" patch, opening the discussion whether other people
agree with deprecating the current behavior in favor of the rescheduling
behavior.
But the consensus on the Git mailing list was that it would make sense
to show a warning in the near future, and flip the default
rebase.rescheduleFailedExec to reschedule failed `exec` commands by
default. See e.g.
<CAGZ79kZL5CRqCDRb6B-EedUm8Z_i4JuSF2=UtwwdRXMitrrOBw@mail.gmail.com>
So let's back out that patch that added the `-y` short option that we
agreed was not necessary or desirable.
This reverts commit 81ef8ee75d5f348d3c71ff633d13d302124e1a5e.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It is a bit cumbersome to write out the `--reschedule-failed-exec`
option before `-x <cmd>` all the time; let's introduce a convenient
option to do both at the same time: `-y <cmd>`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It would be cumbersome to type out that option all the time, so let's
offer the convenience of a config setting: rebase.rescheduleFailedExec.
Besides, this opens the door to changing the default in a future version
of Git: it does make some sense to reschedule failed `exec` commands by
default (and if we could go back in time when the `exec` command was
invented, we probably would change that default right from the start).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
A common use case for the `--exec` option is to verify that each commit
in a topic branch compiles cleanly, via `git rebase -x make <base>`.
However, when an `exec` in such a rebase fails, it is not re-scheduled,
which in this instance is not particularly helpful.
Let's offer a flag to reschedule failed `exec` commands.
Based on an idea by Paul Morelle.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
In preparation to the day when we can deprecate and remove the
"rebase -p", make sure we can skip and later remove tests for
it.
* js/rebase-p-tests:
tests: optionally skip `git rebase -p` tests
t3418: decouple test cases from a previous `rebase -p` test case
t3404: decouple some test cases from outcomes of previous test cases
|
|
The `--preserve-merges` mode of the `rebase` command is slated to be
deprecated soon, as the more powerful `--rebase-merges` mode is
available now, and the latter was designed with the express intent to
address the shortcomings of `--preserve-merges`' design (e.g. the
inability to reorder commits in an interactive rebase).
As such, we will eventually even remove the `--preserve-merges` support,
and along with it, its tests.
In preparation for this, and also to allow the Windows phase of our
automated tests to save some well-needed time when running the test
suite, this commit introduces a new prerequisite REBASE_P, which can be
forced to being unmet by setting the environment variable
`GIT_TEST_SKIP_REBASE_P` to any non-empty string.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It is in general a good idea for regression test cases to be as
independent of each other as possible (with the one exception of an
initial `setup` test case, which is only a test case in Git's test suite
because it does not have a notion of a fixture or setup).
This patch addresses one particular instance of this principle being
violated: a few test cases in t3418-rebase-continue.sh depend on a side
effect of a test case that verifies a specific `rebase -p` behavior. The
later test cases should, however, still succeed even if the `rebase -p`
test case is skipped.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git rebase -i" learned to take 'b' as the short form of 'break'
option in the todo list.
* js/rebase-i-shortopt:
rebase -i: recognize short commands without arguments
|
|
"git rebase -i" learned a new insn, 'break', that the user can
insert in the to-do list. Upon hitting it, the command returns
control back to the user.
* js/rebase-i-break:
rebase -i: introduce the 'break' command
rebase -i: clarify what happens on a failed `exec`
|
|
The sequencer instruction 'b', short for 'break', is rejected:
error: invalid line 2: b
The reason is that the parser expects all short commands to have
an argument. Permit short commands without arguments.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The 'edit' command can be used to cherry-pick a commit and then
immediately drop out of the interactive rebase, with exit code 0, to let
the user amend the commit, or test it, or look around.
Sometimes this functionality would come in handy *without*
cherry-picking a commit, e.g. to interrupt the interactive rebase even
before cherry-picking a commit, or immediately after an 'exec' or a
'merge'.
This commit introduces that functionality, as the spanking new 'break'
command.
Suggested-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When "git rebase -i" is told to squash two or more commits into
one, it labeled the log message for each commit with its number.
It correctly called the first one "1st commit", but the next one
was "commit #1", which was off-by-one. This has been corrected.
* pw/rebase-i-squash-number-fix:
rebase -i: fix numbering in squash message
|
|
Commit e12a7ef597 ("rebase -i: Handle "combination of <n> commits" with
GETTEXT_POISON", 2018-04-27) changed the way that individual commit
messages are labelled when squashing commits together. In doing so a
regression was introduced where the numbering of the messages is off by
one. This commit fixes that and adds a test for the numbering.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Test clean-up and corrections.
* es/test-fixes: (26 commits)
t5608: fix broken &&-chain
t9119: fix broken &&-chains
t9000-t9999: fix broken &&-chains
t7000-t7999: fix broken &&-chains
t6000-t6999: fix broken &&-chains
t5000-t5999: fix broken &&-chains
t4000-t4999: fix broken &&-chains
t3030: fix broken &&-chains
t3000-t3999: fix broken &&-chains
t2000-t2999: fix broken &&-chains
t1000-t1999: fix broken &&-chains
t0000-t0999: fix broken &&-chains
t9814: simplify convoluted check that command correctly errors out
t9001: fix broken "invoke hook" test
t7810: use test_expect_code() instead of hand-rolled comparison
t7400: fix broken "submodule add/reconfigure --force" test
t7201: drop pointless "exit 0" at end of subshell
t6036: fix broken "merge fails but has appropriate contents" tests
t5505: modernize and simplify hard-to-digest test
t5406: use write_script() instead of birthing shell script manually
...
|
|
* en/rebase-i-microfixes:
git-rebase--merge: modernize "git-$cmd" to "git $cmd"
Fix use of strategy options with interactive rebases
t3418: add testcase showing problems with rebase -i and strategy options
|
|
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
git-rebase.sh wrote strategy options to .git/rebase/merge/strategy_opts
in the following format:
'--ours' '--renormalize'
Note the double spaces.
git-rebase--interactive uses sequencer.c to parse that file, and
sequencer.c used split_cmdline() to get the individual strategy options.
After splitting, sequencer.c prefixed each "option" with a double dash,
so, concatenating all its options would result in:
-- --ours -- --renormalize
So, when it ended up calling try_merge_strategy(), that in turn would run
git merge-$strategy -- --ours -- --renormalize $merge_base -- $head $remote
instead of the expected/desired
git merge-$strategy --ours --renormalize $merge_base -- $head $remote
Remove the extra spaces so that when it goes through split_cmdline() we end
up with the desired command line.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We are not passing the same args to merge strategies when we are doing an
--interactive rebase as we do with a --merge rebase. The merge strategy
should not need to be aware of which type of rebase is in effect. Add a
testcase which checks for the appropriate args.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
"git rebase -i" sometimes left intermediate "# This is a
combination of N commits" message meant for the human consumption
inside an editor in the final result in certain corner cases, which
has been fixed.
* js/rebase-i-clean-msg-after-fixup-continue:
rebase --skip: clean up commit message after a failed fixup/squash
sequencer: always commit without editing when asked for
rebase -i: Handle "combination of <n> commits" with GETTEXT_POISON
rebase -i: demonstrate bugs with fixup!/squash! commit messages
|
|
During a series of fixup/squash commands, the interactive rebase builds
up a commit message with comments. This will be presented to the user in
the editor if at least one of those commands was a `squash`.
In any case, the commit message will be cleaned up eventually, removing
all those intermediate comments, in the final step of such a
fixup/squash chain.
However, if the last fixup/squash command in such a chain fails with
merge conflicts, and if the user then decides to skip it (or resolve it
to a clean worktree and then continue the rebase), the current code
fails to clean up the commit message.
This commit fixes that behavior.
The fix is quite a bit more involved than meets the eye because it is
not only about the question whether we are `git rebase --skip`ing a
fixup or squash. It is also about removing the skipped fixup/squash's
commit message from the accumulated commit message. And it is also about
the question whether we should let the user edit the final commit
message or not ("Was there a squash in the chain *that was not
skipped*?").
For example, in this case we will want to fix the commit message, but
not open it in an editor:
pick <- succeeds
fixup <- succeeds
squash <- fails, will be skipped
This is where the newly-introduced `current-fixups` file comes in real
handy. A quick look and we can determine whether there was a non-skipped
squash. We only need to make sure to keep it up to date with respect to
skipped fixup/squash commands. As a bonus, we can even avoid committing
unnecessarily, e.g. when there was only one fixup, and it failed, and
was skipped.
To fix only the bug where the final commit message was not cleaned up
properly, but without fixing the rest, would have been more complicated
than fixing it all in one go, hence this commit lumps together more than
a single concern.
For the same reason, this commit also adds a bit more to the existing
test case for the regression we just fixed.
The diff is best viewed with --color-moved.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When multiple fixup/squash commands are processed and the last one
causes merge conflicts and is skipped, we leave the "This is a
combination of ..." comments in the commit message.
Noticed by Eric Sunshine.
This regression test also demonstrates that we rely on the localized
version of
# This is a combination of <number> commits
to contain the <number> in ASCII, which breaks under GETTEXT_POISON.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
It has been reported that strategy arguments are not passed to `git
merge` correctly when rebasing interactively, preserving merges.
The reason is that the strategy arguments are already quoted, and then
quoted again.
This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1321
Original-patch-by: Kim Gybels <kgybels@infogroep.be>
Also-reported-by: Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Interactive rebase was ignoring '--rerere-autoupdate'. Fix this by
reading it appropriate file when restoring the sequencer state for an
interactive rebase and passing '--rerere-autoupdate' to merge and
cherry-pick when rebasing with '--preserve-merges'.
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Rebase accepts '--rerere-autoupdate' as an option but only honors it
if '-m' is also given. Fix it for a non-interactive rebase by passing
on the option to 'git am' and 'git cherry-pick'. Rework the tests so
that they can be used for each rebase flavor and extend them.
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Since 8389b52 (git-rerere: reuse recorded resolve., 2006-01-28), git-am
will call git-rerere to re-use recorded merge conflict resolutions if
any occur in a threeway merge.
Add a test to ensure that git-rerere is called by git-am (which handles
the non-interactive rebase).
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from
earlier commands in the chain by adding " &&" at the end of line to the
commands that need them.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
If '--[no-]allow_rerere_autoupdate' is passed when 'git rebase -m' is
called and a merge conflict occurs, the flag will be forgotten for the
rest of the rebase process. Make rebase remember it by saving the
value.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When a rebase is resumed, interactive rebase remembers any merge
strategy passed when the rebase was initated. Make non-interactive
rebase remember any merge strategy as well. Also make non-interactive
rebase remember any merge strategy options.
To be able to resume a rebase that was initiated with an older version
of git (older than this commit), make sure not to expect the saved
option files to exist.
Test case idea taken from Junio's 71fc224 (t3402: test "rebase
-s<strategy> -X<opt>", 2010-11-11).
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The sub commands '--continue', '--skip' or '--abort' may only be used
standalone according to the documentation. Other options following the
sub command are currently not accepted, but options preceeding them
are. For example, 'git rebase --continue -v' is not accepted, while
'git rebase -v --continue' is. Tighten up the check and allow no other
options when one of these sub commands are used.
Only check that it is standalone for non-interactive rebase for
now. Once the command line processing for interactive rebase has been
replaced by the command line processing in git-rebase.sh, this check
will also apply to interactive rebase.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When performing a non-interactive rebase, sometimes
"git rebase --continue" will fail if an unmodified file is
touched in the working directory:
You must edit all merge conflicts and then
mark them as resolved using git add
This is caused by "git diff-files" reporting a difference
between the index and the filesystem:
:100644 100644 d00491...... 000000...... M file
The fix is to run "git update-index --refresh" before
"git diff-files" as is done in git-rebase--interactive.
Signed-off-by: David D. Kilzer <ddkilzer@kilzer.net>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
