summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t1430-bad-ref-name.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-12-07t1430: create valid symrefs using test-helperHan-Wen Nienhuys
This still leaves some other direct filesystem access. Currently, the files backend does not allow invalidly named symrefs. Fixes for this are currently in the 'seen' branch Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-07t1430: remove refs using test-toolHan-Wen Nienhuys
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-07refs: introduce REF_SKIP_REFNAME_VERIFICATION flagHan-Wen Nienhuys
Use this flag with the test-helper in t1430, to avoid direct writes to the ref database. Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-10-25Merge branch 'ab/mark-leak-free-tests'Junio C Hamano
Bunch of tests are marked as "passing leak check". * ab/mark-leak-free-tests: leak tests: mark some misc tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak leak tests: mark various "generic" tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak leak tests: mark some read-tree tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak leak tests: mark some ls-files tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak leak tests: mark all checkout-index tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak leak tests: mark all trace2 tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak leak tests: mark all ls-tree tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak leak tests: run various "test-tool" tests in t00*.sh SANITIZE=leak leak tests: run various built-in tests in t00*.sh SANITIZE=leak
2021-10-13leak tests: mark various "generic" tests as passing with SANITIZE=leakÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Mark various "generic" tests as passing when git is compiled with SANITIZE=leak. These tests were subjectively picked from the lists of passing tests since they're all small, and test some generic feature such as wildmatch(), commonly used environment variables, ident parsing etc. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-09-27ref-filter: stop setting FILTER_REFS_INCLUDE_BROKENJeff King
Of the ref-filter callers, for-each-ref and git-branch both set the INCLUDE_BROKEN flag (but git-tag does not, which is a weird inconsistency). But now that GIT_REF_PARANOIA is on by default, that produces almost the same outcome for all three. The one exception is that GIT_REF_PARANOIA will omit dangling symrefs. That's a better behavior for these tools, as they would never include such a symref in the main output anyway (they can't, as it doesn't point to an object). Instead they issue a warning to stderr. But that warning is somewhat useless; a dangling symref is a perfectly reasonable thing to have in your repository, and is not a sign of corruption. It's much friendlier to just quietly ignore it. And in terms of robustness, the warning gains us little. It does not impact the exit code of either tool. So while the warning _might_ clue in a user that they have an unexpected broken symref, it would not help any kind of scripted use. This patch converts for-each-ref and git-branch to stop using the INCLUDE_BROKEN flag. That gives them more reasonable behavior, and harmonizes them with git-tag. We have to change one test to adapt to the situation. t1430 tries to trigger all of the REF_ISBROKEN behaviors from the underlying ref code. It uses for-each-ref to do so (because there isn't any other mechanism). That will no longer issue a warning about the symref which points to an invalid name, as it's considered dangling (and we can instead be sure that it's _not_ mentioned on stderr). Note that we do still complain about the illegally named "broken..symref"; its problem is not that it's dangling, but the name of the symref itself is illegal. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-11tests: remove most uses of C_LOCALE_OUTPUTÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
As a follow-up to d162b25f956 (tests: remove support for GIT_TEST_GETTEXT_POISON, 2021-01-20) remove those uses of the now always true C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prerequisite from those tests which declare it as an argument to test_expect_{success,failure}. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19t[01]*: adjust the references to the default branch name "main"Johannes Schindelin
Carefully excluding t1309, which sees independent development elsewhere at the time of writing, we transition above-mentioned tests to the default branch name `main`. This trick was performed via $ (cd t && sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \ -e 's/Master/Main/g' -e 's/naster/nain/g' -- t[01]*.sh && git checkout HEAD -- t1309\*) Note that t5533 contains a variation of the name `master` (`naster`) that we rename here, too. This allows us to define `GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for those tests. Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-19tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`Johannes Schindelin
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-11-15branch: correctly reject refs/heads/{-dash,HEAD}Junio C Hamano
strbuf_check_branch_ref() is the central place where many codepaths see if a proposed name is suitable for the name of a branch. It was designed to allow us to get stricter than the check_refname_format() check used for refnames in general, and we already use it to reject a branch whose name begins with a '-'. The function gets a strbuf and a string "name", and returns non-zero if the name is not appropriate as the name for a branch. When the name is good, it places the full refname for the branch with the proposed name in the strbuf before it returns. However, it turns out that one caller looks at what is in the strbuf even when the function returns an error. Make the function populate the strbuf even when it returns an error. That way, when "-dash" is given as name, "refs/heads/-dash" is placed in the strbuf when returning an error to copy_or_rename_branch(), which notices that the user is trying to recover with "git branch -m -- -dash dash" to rename "-dash" to "dash". While at it, use the same mechanism to also reject "HEAD" as a branch name. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-11tests: fix tests broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPleaseÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
The GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease compile-time testing option added in my bb946bba76 ("i18n: add GETTEXT_POISON to simulate unfriendly translator", 2011-02-22) has been slowly bitrotting as strings have been marked for translation, and new tests have been added without running it. I brought this up on the list ("[BUG] test suite broken with GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease", [1]) asking whether this mode was useful at all anymore. At least one person occasionally uses it, and Lars Schneider offered to change one of the the Travis builds to run in this mode, so fix up the failing ones. My test setup runs most of the tests, with the notable exception of skipping all the p4 tests, so it's possible that there's still some lurking regressions I haven't fixed. 1. <CACBZZX62+acvi1dpkknadTL827mtCm_QesGSZ=6+UnyeMpg8+Q@mail.gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-13ref_transaction_update(): check refname_is_safe() at a minimumMichael Haggerty
If the user has asked that a new value be set for a reference, we use check_refname_format() to verify that the reference name satisfies all of the rules. But in other cases, at least check that refname_is_safe(). Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
2016-04-10t1430: improve test coverage of deletion of badly-named refsMichael Haggerty
Check "branch -d broken...ref" Check various combinations of * Deleting using "update-ref -d" * Deleting using "update-ref --no-deref -d" * Deleting using "branch -d" in the following combinations of symref -> ref: * badname -> broken...ref * badname -> broken...ref (dangling) * broken...symref -> master * broken...symref -> idonotexist (dangling) Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-10t1430: test for-each-ref in the presence of badly-named refsMichael Haggerty
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-10t1430: don't rely on symbolic-ref for creating broken symrefsMichael Haggerty
It's questionable whether it should even work. Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-10t1430: clean up broken refs/tags/shadowMichael Haggerty
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-10t1430: test the output and error of some commands more carefullyMichael Haggerty
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-09-25branch.c: use 'ref-filter' APIsKarthik Nayak
Make 'branch.c' use 'ref-filter' APIs for iterating through refs sorting. This removes most of the code used in 'branch.c' replacing it with calls to the 'ref-filter' library. Make 'branch.c' use the 'filter_refs()' function provided by 'ref-filter' to filter out tags based on the options set. We provide a sorting option provided for 'branch.c' by using the sorting options provided by 'ref-filter'. Also by default, we sort by 'refname'. Since 'HEAD' is alphabatically before 'refs/...' we end up with an array consisting of the 'HEAD' ref then the local branches and finally the remote-tracking branches. Also remove the 'ignore' variable from ref_array_item as it was previously used for the '--merged' option and now that is handled by ref-filter. Modify some of the tests in t1430 to check the stderr for a warning regarding the broken ref. This is done as ref-filter throws a warning for broken refs rather than directly printing them. Add tests and documentation for the same. Mentored-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> Mentored-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-16t1430: add another refs-escape testJeff King
In t1430, we check whether deleting the branch "../../foo" will delete ".git/foo". However, this is not that interesting a test; the precious file ".git/foo" does not look like a ref, so even if we did not notice the "escape" from the "refs/" hierarchy, we would fail for that reason (i.e., if you turned refname_is_safe into a noop, the test still passes). Let's add an additional test for the same thing, but with a file that actually looks like a ref. That will make sure we are exercising the refname_is_safe code. While we're at it, let's also make the code work a little harder by adding some extra paths and some empty path components. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-15refs.c: allow listing and deleting badly named refsRonnie Sahlberg
We currently do not handle badly named refs well: $ cp .git/refs/heads/master .git/refs/heads/master.....@\*@\\. $ git branch fatal: Reference has invalid format: 'refs/heads/master.....@*@\.' $ git branch -D master.....@\*@\\. error: branch 'master.....@*@\.' not found. Users cannot recover from a badly named ref without manually finding and deleting the loose ref file or appropriate line in packed-refs. Making that easier will make it easier to tweak the ref naming rules in the future, for example to forbid shell metacharacters like '`' and '"', without putting people in a state that is hard to get out of. So allow "branch --list" to show these refs and allow "branch -d/-D" and "update-ref -d" to delete them. Other commands (for example to rename refs) will continue to not handle these refs but can be changed in later patches. Details: In resolving functions, refuse to resolve refs that don't pass the git-check-ref-format(1) check unless the new RESOLVE_REF_ALLOW_BAD_NAME flag is passed. Even with RESOLVE_REF_ALLOW_BAD_NAME, refuse to resolve refs that escape the refs/ directory and do not match the pattern [A-Z_]* (think "HEAD" and "MERGE_HEAD"). In locking functions, refuse to act on badly named refs unless they are being deleted and either are in the refs/ directory or match [A-Z_]*. Just like other invalid refs, flag resolved, badly named refs with the REF_ISBROKEN flag, treat them as resolving to null_sha1, and skip them in all iteration functions except for for_each_rawref. Flag badly named refs (but not symrefs pointing to badly named refs) with a REF_BAD_NAME flag to make it easier for future callers to notice and handle them specially. For example, in a later patch for-each-ref will use this flag to detect refs whose names can confuse callers parsing for-each-ref output. In the transaction API, refuse to create or update badly named refs, but allow deleting them (unless they try to escape refs/ and don't match [A-Z_]*). Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-10-15test: put tests for handling of bad ref names in one placeRonnie Sahlberg
There's no straightforward way to grep for all tests dealing with invalid refs. Put them in a single test script so it is easy to see what functionality has not been exercised with bad ref names yet. Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>