summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t1302-repo-version.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-07-30Merge branch 'jk/reject-newer-extensions-in-v0' into masterJunio C Hamano
With the base fix to 2.27 regresion, any new extensions in a v0 repository would still be silently honored, which is not quite right. Instead, complain and die loudly. * jk/reject-newer-extensions-in-v0: verify_repository_format(): complain about new extensions in v0 repo
2020-07-16verify_repository_format(): complain about new extensions in v0 repoJeff King
We made the mistake in the past of respecting extensions.* even when the repository format version was set to 0. This is bad because forgetting to bump the repository version means that older versions of Git (which do not know about our extensions) won't complain. I.e., it's not a problem in itself, but it means your repository is in a state which does not give you the protection you think you're getting from older versions. For compatibility reasons, we are stuck with that decision for existing extensions. However, we'd prefer not to extend the damage further. We can do that by catching any newly-added extensions and complaining about the repository format. Note that this is a pretty heavy hammer: we'll refuse to work with the repository at all. A lesser option would be to ignore (possibly with a warning) any new extensions. But because of the way the extensions are handled, that puts the burden on each new extension that is added to remember to "undo" itself (because they are handled before we know for sure whether we are in a v1 repo or not, since we don't insist on a particular ordering of config entries). So one option would be to rewrite that handling to record any new extensions (and their values) during the config parse, and then only after proceed to handle new ones only if we're in a v1 repository. But I'm not sure if it's worth the trouble: - ignoring extensions is likely to end up with broken results anyway (e.g., ignoring a proposed objectformat extension means parsing any object data is likely to encounter errors) - this is a sign that whatever tool wrote the extension field is broken. We may be better off notifying immediately and forcefully so that such tools don't even appear to work accidentally. The only downside is that fixing the situation is a little tricky, because programs like "git config" won't want to work with the repository. But: git config --file=.git/config core.repositoryformatversion 1 should still suffice. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-27t1302: expect repo format version 1 for SHA-256brian m. carlson
When using SHA-256, we need to take advantage of the extensions section in the config file, so we need to use repository format version 1. Update the test to look for the correct value. Note that test_oid produces a value without a trailing newline, so use echo to ensure we print a trailing newline to compare it correctly against the actual results. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-13config: only read .git/config from configured reposJeff King
When git_config() runs, it looks in the system, user-wide, and repo-level config files. It gets the latter by calling git_pathdup(), which in turn calls get_git_dir(). If we haven't set up the git repository yet, this may simply return ".git", and we will look at ".git/config". This seems like it would be helpful (presumably we haven't set up the repository yet, so it tries to find it), but it turns out to be a bad idea for a few reasons: - it's not sufficient, and therefore hides bugs in a confusing way. Config will be respected if commands are run from the top-level of the working tree, but not from a subdirectory. - it's not always true that we haven't set up the repository _yet_; we may not want to do it at all. For instance, if you run "git init /some/path" from inside another repository, it should not load config from the existing repository. - there might be a path ".git/config", but it is not the actual repository we would find via setup_git_directory(). This may happen, e.g., if you are storing a git repository inside another git repository, but have munged one of the files in such a way that the inner repository is not valid (e.g., by removing HEAD). We have at least two bugs of the second type in git-init, introduced by ae5f677 (lazily load core.sharedrepository, 2016-03-11). It causes init to use git_configset(), which loads all of the config, including values from the current repo (if any). This shows up in two ways: 1. If we happen to be in an existing repository directory, we'll read and respect core.sharedrepository from it, even though it should have no bearing on the new repository. A new test in t1301 covers this. 2. Similarly, if we're in an existing repo that sets core.logallrefupdates, that will cause init to fail to set it in a newly created repository (because it thinks that the user's templates already did so). A new test in t0001 covers this. We also need to adjust an existing test in t1302, which gives another example of why this patch is an improvement. That test creates an embedded repository with a bogus core.repositoryformatversion of "99". It wants to make sure that we actually stop at the bogus repo rather than continuing upward to find the outer repo. So it checks that "git config core.repositoryformatversion" returns 99. But that only works because we blindly read ".git/config", even though we _know_ we're in a repository whose vintage we do not understand. After this patch, we avoid reading config from the unknown vintage repository at all, which is a safer choice. But we need to tweak the test, since core.repositoryformatversion will not return 99; it will claim that it could not find the variable at all. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-09-13t1302: use "git -C"Jeff King
This is shorter, and saves a subshell. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-25introduce "preciousObjects" repository extensionJeff King
If this extension is used in a repository, then no operations should run which may drop objects from the object storage. This can be useful if you are sharing that storage with other repositories whose refs you cannot see. For instance, if you do: $ git clone -s parent child $ git -C parent config extensions.preciousObjects true $ git -C parent config core.repositoryformatversion 1 you now have additional safety when running git in the parent repository. Prunes and repacks will bail with an error, and `git gc` will skip those operations (it will continue to pack refs and do other non-object operations). Older versions of git, when run in the repository, will fail on every operation. Note that we do not set the preciousObjects extension by default when doing a "clone -s", as doing so breaks backwards compatibility. It is a decision the user should make explicitly. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-25introduce "extensions" form of core.repositoryformatversionJeff King
Normally we try to avoid bumps of the whole-repository core.repositoryformatversion field. However, it is unavoidable if we want to safely change certain aspects of git in a backwards-incompatible way (e.g., modifying the set of ref tips that we must traverse to generate a list of unreachable, safe-to-prune objects). If we were to bump the repository version for every such change, then any implementation understanding version `X` would also have to understand `X-1`, `X-2`, and so forth, even though the incompatibilities may be in orthogonal parts of the system, and there is otherwise no reason we cannot implement one without the other (or more importantly, that the user cannot choose to use one feature without the other, weighing the tradeoff in compatibility only for that particular feature). This patch documents the existing repositoryformatversion strategy and introduces a new format, "1", which lets a repository specify that it must run with an arbitrary set of extensions. This can be used, for example: - to inform git that the objects should not be pruned based only on the reachability of the ref tips (e.g, because it has "clone --shared" children) - that the refs are stored in a format besides the usual "refs" and "packed-refs" directories Because we bump to format "1", and because format "1" requires that a running git knows about any extensions mentioned, we know that older versions of the code will not do something dangerous when confronted with these new formats. For example, if the user chooses to use database storage for refs, they may set the "extensions.refbackend" config to "db". Older versions of git will not understand format "1" and bail. Versions of git which understand "1" but do not know about "refbackend", or which know about "refbackend" but not about the "db" backend, will refuse to run. This is annoying, of course, but much better than the alternative of claiming that there are no refs in the repository, or writing to a location that other implementations will not read. Note that we are only defining the rules for format 1 here. We do not ever write format 1 ourselves; it is a tool that is meant to be used by users and future extensions to provide safety with older implementations. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-21t: prefer "git config --file" to GIT_CONFIGJeff King
Doing: GIT_CONFIG=foo git config ... is equivalent to: git config --file=foo ... The latter is easier to read and slightly less error-prone, because of issues with one-shot variables and shell functions (e.g., you cannot use the former with test_must_fail). Note that we explicitly leave one case in t1300 which checks the same operation on both GIT_CONFIG and "git config --file". They are equivalent in the code these days, but this will make sure it remains so. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-09tests: add missing &&Jonathan Nieder
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-09t1302 (core.repositoryversion): style tweaksJonathan Nieder
This test is from 2007, which is late enough for the style to be recognizably modern but still a while ago. Freshen it up to follow new best practices: - guard setup commands with test_expect_setup, so errors at that stage can be caught; - use <<\EOF in preference to <<EOF, to save reviewers the trouble of looking for variable interpolations; - use test_cmp instead of test "$foo" = "$bar", for better output with -v on failure; - indent commands in subshells and let them span multiple lines; - combine the two "gitdir required mode" tests that do not make as much sense alone. Cc: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-09tests: subshell indentation stylefixJonathan Nieder
Format the subshells introduced by the previous patch (Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of around, 2010-09-06) like so: ( cd subdir && ... ) && This is generally easier to read and has the nice side-effect that this patch will show what commands are used in the subshell, making it easier to check for lost environment variables and similar behavior changes. Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-06Several tests: cd inside subshell instead of aroundJens Lehmann
Fixed all places where it was a straightforward change from cd'ing into a directory and back via "cd .." to a cd inside a subshell. Found these places with "git grep -w "cd \.\.". Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"Stephan Beyer
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git". This is useful to - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal, e.g. SIGSEGV, and - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-02Sane use of test_expect_failureJunio C Hamano
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-12-05Do check_repository_format() early (re-fix)Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
This pushes check_repository_format() (actually _gently() version) to setup_git_directory_gently() in order to prevent from using unsupported repositories. New setup_git_directory_gently()'s behaviour is stop searching for a valid gitdir and return as if there is no gitdir if a unsupported repository is found. Warning will be thrown in these cases. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>