summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t0040-parse-options.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-08-21tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>'SZEDER Gábor
Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-03-22parse-options: do not show usage upon invalid option valuePaul-Sebastian Ungureanu
Usually, the usage should be shown only if the user does not know what options are available. If the user specifies an invalid value, the user is already aware of the available options. In this case, there is no point in displaying the usage anymore. This patch applies to "git tag --contains", "git branch --contains", "git branch --points-at", "git for-each-ref --contains" and many more. Signed-off-by: Paul-Sebastian Ungureanu <ungureanupaulsebastian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-25parse-options: write blank line to correct output streamBrandon Casey
When commit 54e6dc7 added translation support to parse-options, an fprintf was mistakenly replaced by a call to putchar(). Let's use fputc instead. Fixes t0040.11, t0040.12, t0040.33, and t1502.8. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-25t0040,t1502: Demonstrate parse_options bugsBrandon Casey
When the option spec contains no switches or only hidden switches, parse_options will emit an extra blank line at the end of help output so that the help text will end in two blank lines instead of one. When parse_options produces internal help output after an error has occurred it will emit blank lines within the usage string to stdout instead of stderr. Update t/helper/test-parse-options.c to have a description body in the usage string to exercise this second bug and mark tests as failing in t0040. Add tests to t1502 to demonstrate both of these problems. Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-10-17t0040: convert all possible tests to use `test-parse-options --expect`Pranit Bauva
Use "test-parse-options --expect" to rewrite the tests to avoid checking the whole variable dump by just testing what is required. This commit is a follow-up to 8ca65aebad ("t0040: convert a few tests to use test-parse-options --expect", 2016-05-06). Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-10t0040: convert a few tests to use test-parse-options --expectJunio C Hamano
As a small example of using "test-parse-options --expect", rewrite the "check" helper using it, instead of comparing the whole variable dump. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-10t0040: remove unused test helpersJunio C Hamano
9a001381 (Fix tests under GETTEXT_POISON on parseopt, 2012-08-27) introduced check_i18n, but the helper was never used from the beginning. The same commit also introduced check_unknown_i18n to replace the helper check_unknown and changed all users of the latter to use the former, but failed to remove check_unknown itself. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-10test-parse-options: --expect=<string> option to simplify testsJunio C Hamano
Existing tests in t0040 follow a rather verbose pattern: cat >expect <<\EOF boolean: 0 integer: 0 magnitude: 0 timestamp: 0 string: (not set) abbrev: 7 verbose: 0 quiet: 3 dry run: no file: (not set) EOF test_expect_success 'multiple quiet levels' ' test-parse-options -q -q -q >output 2>output.err && test_must_be_empty output.err && test_cmp expect output ' But the only thing this test cares about is if "quiet: 3" is in the output. We should be able to write the above 18 lines with just four lines, like this: test_expect_success 'multiple quiet levels' ' test-parse-options --expect="quiet: 3" -q -q -q ' Teach the new --expect=<string> option to test-parse-options helper. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-10test-parse-options: fix output when callback option failsJunio C Hamano
When test-parse-options detects an error on the command line, it gives the usage string just like any parse-options API users do, without showing any "variable dump". An exception is the callback test, where a "variable dump" for the option is done before the command line options are fully parsed. Do not expose this implementation detail by separating the handling of callback test into two phases, one to capture the fact that an option was given during the option parsing phase, and the other to show that fact as a part of normal "variable dump". The effect of this fix is seen in the patch to t/t0040 where it tried "test-parse-options --no-length" where "--length" is a callback that does not take a negative form. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-05parse-options.c: make OPTION_COUNTUP respect "unspecified" valuesPranit Bauva
OPT_COUNTUP() merely increments the counter upon --option, and resets it to 0 upon --no-option, which means that there is no "unspecified" value with which a client can initialize the counter to determine whether or not --[no]-option was seen at all. Make OPT_COUNTUP() treat any negative number as an "unspecified" value to address this shortcoming. In particular, if a client initializes the counter to -1, then if it is still -1 after parse_options(), then neither --option nor --no-option was seen; if it is 0, then --no-option was seen last, and if it is 1 or greater, than --option was seen last. This change does not affect the behavior of existing clients because they all use the initial value of 0 (or more). Note that builtin/clean.c initializes the variable used with OPT__FORCE (which uses OPT_COUNTUP()) to a negative value, but it is set to either 0 or 1 by reading the configuration before the code calls parse_options(), i.e. as far as parse_options() is concerned, the initial value of the variable is not negative. To test this behavior, in test-parse-options.c, "verbose" is set to "unspecified" while quiet is set to 0 which will test the new behavior with all sets of values. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-05-05t0040-parse-options: improve test coveragePranit Bauva
Include tests to check for multiple levels of quiet and to check the behavior of '--no-quiet'. Include tests to check for multiple levels of verbose and to check the behavior of '--no-verbose'. Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-19test-parse-options: print quiet as integerPranit Bauva
We would want to see how multiple --quiet options affect the value of the underlying variable (we may want "--quiet --quiet" to still be 1, or we may want to see the value incremented to 2). Show the value as integer to allow us to inspect it. Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-19t0040-test-parse-options.sh: fix style issuesPranit Bauva
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-22parse-options: move unsigned long option parsing out of pack-objects.cCharles Bailey
The unsigned long option parsing (including 'k'/'m'/'g' suffix parsing) is more widely applicable. Add support for OPT_MAGNITUDE to parse-options.h and change pack-objects.c use this support. The error behavior on parse errors follows that of OPT_INTEGER. The name of the option that failed to parse is reported with a brief message describing the expect format for the option argument and then the full usage message for the command invoked. This differs from the previous behavior for OPT_ULONG used in pack-objects for --max-pack-size and --window-memory which used to display the value supplied in the error message and did not display the full usage message. Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-22test-parse-options: update to handle negative intsCharles Bailey
Fix the printf specification to treat 'integer' as the signed type that it is and add a test that checks that we parse negative option arguments. Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <cbailey32@bloomberg.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-20t: use test_expect_code instead of hand-rolled comparisonJeff King
This makes our output in the event of a failure slightly nicer, and it means that we do not break the &&-chain. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-03-31parse-options: remove unused OPT_SET_PTRMarat Radchenko
OPT_SET_PTR was never used since its creation at db7244bd (parse-options new features., 2007-11-07). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-09test: test_must_be_empty helperJunio C Hamano
There are quite a lot places where an output file is expected to be empty, and we fail the test when it is not. The output from running the test script with -i -v can be helped if we showed the unexpected contents at that point. We could of course do >expected.empty && test_cmp expected.empty actual but this is commmon enough to be done with a dedicated helper. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-27Fix tests under GETTEXT_POISON on parseoptJiang Xin
Use the i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for parseopt tests. This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10.1-488-g54e6d: 54e6d i18n: parseopt: lookup help and argument translations when showing usage and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-05parse-options: typo check for unknown switchesRené Scharfe
The user specifies a long option but forgets to type the second leading dash, we currently detect and report that fact if its first letter is a valid short option. This is done for safety, to avoid ambiguity between short options (and their arguments) and a long option with a missing dash. This diagnostic message is also helpful for long options whose first letter is not a valid short option, however. Print it in that case, too, as a courtesy. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-26parse-options: allow positivation of options starting, with no-René Scharfe
Long options can be negated by adding no- right after the leading two dashes. This is useful e.g. to override options set by aliases. For options that are defined to start with no- already, this looks a bit funny. Allow such options to also be negated by removing the prefix. The following thirteen options are affected: apply --no-add bisect--helper --no-checkout checkout-index --no-create clone --no-checkout --no-hardlinks commit --no-verify --no-post-rewrite format-patch --no-binary hash-object --no-filters read-tree --no-sparse-checkout revert --no-commit show-branch --no-name update-ref --no-deref The following five are NOT affected because they are defined with PARSE_OPT_NONEG or the non-negated version is defined as well: branch --no-merged format-patch --no-stat --no-numbered update-index --no-assume-unchanged --no-skip-worktree Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-26test-parse-options: convert to OPT_BOOL()René Scharfe
Introduce OPT_BOOL() to test-parse-options and add some tests for these "true" boolean options. Rename OPT_BOOLEAN to OPT_COUNTUP and OPTION_BOOLEAN to OPTION_COUNTUP as well. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-28parseopt: add OPT_NOOP_NOARGRené Scharfe
Add OPT_NOOP_NOARG, a helper macro to define deprecated options in a standard way. The help text is taken from the no-op option -r of git revert. The callback could be made to emit a (conditional?) warning later. And we could also add OPT_NOOP (requiring an argument) etc. as needed. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-06-22parse-options: add OPT_STRING_LIST helperJeff King
This just adds repeated invocations of an option to a list of strings. Using the "--no-<var>" form will reset the list to empty. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-15Make <identifier> lowercase as per CodingGuidelinesMichael J Gruber
*.c part for matches with '<[A-Z]+>' (and affected test). Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-01print the usage string on stdout instead of stderrGiuseppe Scrivano
When -h is used, print usage messages on stdout. If a command is invoked with wrong arguments then print the usage messages on stderr. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivano@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-29parse-opt: ignore negation of OPT_NONEG for ambiguity checksAndreas Schwab
parse_long_opt always matches both --opt and --no-opt for any option "opt", and only get_value checks whether --no-opt is actually valid. Since the options for git branch contains both "no-merged" and "merged" there are two matches for --no-merge, but no exact match. With this patch the negation of a NONEG option is rejected earlier, but it changes the error message from "option `no-opt' isn't available" to "unknown option `no-opt'". [jk: added test] Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2009-05-25parse-opts: add OPT_FILENAME and transition builtinsStephen Boyd
Commit dbd0f5c (Files given on the command line are relative to $cwd, 2008-08-06) introduced parse_options_fix_filename() as a minimal fix. OPT_FILENAME is intended to be a more robust fix for the same issue. OPT_FILENAME and its associated enum OPTION_FILENAME are used to represent filename options within the parse options API. This option is similar to OPTION_STRING. If --no is prefixed to the option the filename is unset. If no argument is given and the default value is set, the filename is set to the default value. The difference is that the filename is prefixed with the prefix passed to parse_options() (or parse_options_start()). Update git-apply, git-commit, git-fmt-merge-msg, and git-tag to use OPT_FILENAME with their filename options. Also, rename parse_options_fix_filename() to fix_filename() as it is no longer extern. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-09parseopt: add PARSE_OPT_NODASHRené Scharfe
Add support for options that don't start with a dash. Initially, they don't accept arguments and can only be short options, i.e. consist of a single character. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-09parseopt: add OPT_NUMBER_CALLBACKRené Scharfe
Add a way to recognize numerical options. The number is passed to a callback function as a string. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-05-09parseopt: add OPT_NEGBITRené Scharfe
Add OPTION_NEGBIT and OPT_NEGBIT, mirroring OPTION_BIT and OPT_BIT. OPT_NEGBIT can be used together with OPT_BIT to define two options that cancel each other out. Note: this patch removes the reminder from the test script because it adds a test for --no-or4 and there already was one for --or4. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-30Fix test-parse-options "integer" testJunio C Hamano
OPT_INTEGER() works on an integer, not on an unsigned long. On a big endian architecture with long larger than int, integer test gives bogus results because of this bug. Reported by H.Merijn Brand in HP-UX 64-bit environment. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-22parse-options: fix segmentation fault when a required value is missingOlivier Marin
p->argc represent the number of arguments that have not been parsed yet, _including_ the one we are currently parsing. If it is not greater than one then there is no more argument. Signed-off-by: Olivier Marin <dkr@freesurf.fr> Acked-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-23Extend parse-options test suiteStephan Beyer
This patch serves two purposes: 1. test-parse-option.c should be a more complete example for the parse-options API, and 2. there have been no tests for OPT_CALLBACK, OPT_DATE, OPT_BIT, OPT_SET_INT and OPT_SET_PTR before. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index"Junio C Hamano
As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-02parse-options: new option type to treat an option-like parameter as an argument.Pierre Habouzit
This is meant to be used to keep --not and --all during revision parsing. Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-02Sane use of test_expect_failureJunio C Hamano
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-26parse-options: catch likely typo in presense of aggregated options.Pierre Habouzit
If options are aggregated, and that the whole token is an exact prefix of a long option that is longer than 2 letters, reject it. This is to prevent a common typo: $ git commit -amend to get interpreted as "commit all with message 'end'". The typo check isn't performed if there is no aggregation, because the stuck form is the recommended one. If we have `-o` being a valid short option that takes an argument, and --option a long one, then we _MUST_ accept -option as "'o' option with argument 'ption'", which is our official recommended form. Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-06parse-options: abbreviation engine fix.Johannes Schindelin
When an option could be an ambiguous abbreviation of two options, the code used to error out. Even if an exact match would have occured later. Test and original patch by Pierre Habouzit. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-30parse-options: Allow abbreviated options when unambiguousJohannes Schindelin
When there is an option "--amend", the option parser now recognizes "--am" for that option, provided that there is no other option beginning with "--am". Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2007-10-30Add tests for parse-options.cJohannes Schindelin
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>