summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-rebase.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-09-20Merge branch 'mm/rebase-continue-freebsd-WB'Junio C Hamano
Work around a bug in FreeBSD shell that caused a regression to "git rebase" in v1.8.4. May need to be later applied to 'maint'. * mm/rebase-continue-freebsd-WB: rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD
2013-09-09rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSDMatthieu Moy
Since a1549e10, git-rebase--am.sh uses the shell's "return" statement, to mean "return from the current file inclusion", which is POSIXly correct, but badly interpreted on FreeBSD, which returns from the current function, hence skips the finish_rebase statement that follows the file inclusion. Make the use of "return" portable by using the file inclusion as the last statement of a function. Reported-by: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-31Merge branch 'rr/rebase-autostash'Junio C Hamano
* rr/rebase-autostash: git-rebase: fix typo
2013-07-29git-rebase: fix typoRalf Thielow
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-18Merge branch 'rr/rebase-reflog-message-reword'Junio C Hamano
"git rebase [-i]" used to leave just "rebase" as its reflog message for some operations. This rewords them to be more informative. * rr/rebase-reflog-message-reword: rebase -i: use a better reflog message rebase: use a better reflog message
2013-06-27Merge branch 'rr/rebase-stash-store'Junio C Hamano
Finishing touches for the "git rebase --autostash" feature introduced earlier. * rr/rebase-stash-store: rebase: use 'git stash store' to simplify logic stash: introduce 'git stash store' stash: simplify option parser for create stash doc: document short form -p in synopsis stash doc: add a warning about using create
2013-06-24Merge branch 'rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query'Junio C Hamano
Allow various commit objects to be given to "git rebase" by ':/look for this string' syntax, e.g. "git rebase --onto ':/there'". * rr/rebase-sha1-by-string-query: rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriate sh-setup: add new peel_committish() helper t/rebase: add failing tests for a peculiar revision
2013-06-24rebase: use a better reflog messageRamkumar Ramachandra
Now that the "checkout" invoked internally from "rebase" knows to honor GIT_REFLOG_ACTION, we can start to use it to write a better reflog message when "rebase anotherbranch", "rebase --onto branch", etc. internally checks out the new fork point. We will write: rebase: checkout master instead of the old rebase Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-17rebase: use 'git stash store' to simplify logicRamkumar Ramachandra
rebase has no reason to know about the implementation of the stash. In the case when applying the autostash results in conflicts, replace the relevant code in finish_rebase () to simply call 'git stash store'. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-14rebase: use peel_committish() where appropriateRamkumar Ramachandra
The revisions specified on the command-line as <onto> and <upstream> arguments could be of the form :/quuxery; so, use peel_committish() to resolve them. The failing tests in t/rebase and t/rebase-interactive now pass. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-13rebase: finish_rebase() in noop rebaseRamkumar Ramachandra
In the following case $ git rebase master Current branch autostash-fix is up to date. the autostash is not applied automatically, because this codepath forgets to call finish_rebase(). Fix this. Also add a test to guard against regressions. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-13rebase: finish_rebase() in fast-forward rebaseRamkumar Ramachandra
In the following case $ git rebase master Fast-forwarded autostash-fix to master. The autostash is not applied automatically, because this codepath forgets to call finish_rebase(). Fix this. Also add a test to guard against regressions. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-13rebase: guard against missing files in read_basic_state()Ramkumar Ramachandra
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-29rebase: implement --[no-]autostash and rebase.autostashRamkumar Ramachandra
This new feature allows a rebase to be executed on a dirty worktree or index. It works by creating a temporary "dangling merge commit" out of the worktree and index changes (via 'git stash create'), and automatically applying it after a successful rebase or abort. rebase stores the SHA-1 hex of the temporary merge commit, along with the rest of the rebase state, in either .git/{rebase-merge,rebase-apply}/autostash depending on the kind of rebase. Since $state_dir is automatically removed at the end of a successful rebase or abort, so is the autostash. The advantage of this approach is that we do not affect the normal stash's reflogs, making the autostash invisible to the end-user. This means that you can use 'git stash' during a rebase as usual. When the autostash application results in a conflict, we push $state_dir/autostash onto the normal stash and remove $state_dir ending the rebase. The user can inspect the stash, and pop or drop at any time. Most significantly, this feature means that a caller like pull (with pull.rebase set to true) can easily be patched to remove the require_clean_work_tree restriction. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-13rebase: prepare to do generic housekeepingRamkumar Ramachandra
On successful completion of a rebase in git-rebase--$backend.sh, the $backend script cleans up on its own and exits. The cleanup routine is however, independent of the $backend, and each $backend script unnecessarily duplicates this work: rm -rf "$state_dir" git gc --auto Prepare git-rebase.sh for later patches that return control from each $backend script back to us, for performing this generic cleanup routine. The code that this patch adds is currently unreachable, and will only start to be used when git-rebase--$backend.sh scripts are taught to return control in later patches. Another advantage is that git-rebase.sh can implement a generic finish_rebase() to possibly do additional tasks in addition to the cleanup. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-26Merge branch 'ph/rebase-original'Junio C Hamano
* ph/rebase-original: rebase: find orig_head unambiguously
2013-04-23rebase: find orig_head unambiguouslyPhil Hord
When we 'git rebase $upstream', git uses 'rev-parse --verify $current_branch' to find ORIG_HEAD. But if $current_branch is ambiguous, 'rev-parse --verify' emits a warning and returns a SHA1 anyway. When the wrong ambiguous choice is used, git-rebase fails non-gracefully: it emits a warning about failing to lock $current_branch, an error about being unable to checkout $current_branch again, and it might even decide the rebase is a fast-forward when it is not. In the 'rebase $upstream' case, we already know the unambiguous spelling of $current_branch is "HEAD". Fix git-rebase to find $orig_head unambiguously. Add a test in t3400-rebase.sh which creates an ambiguous branch name and rebases it implicitly with 'git rebase $other'. Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-18rebase -i: Teach "--edit-todo" actionAndrew Wong
This allows users to edit the todo file while they're stopped in the middle of an interactive rebase. When this action is executed, all comments from the original todo file are stripped, and new help messages are appended to the end. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-18rebase usage: subcommands can not be combined with -iMartin von Zweigbergk
Since 95135b0 (rebase: stricter check of standalone sub command, 2011-02-06), git-rebase has not allowed to use -i together with e.g. --continue. Yet, when rebase started using OPTIONS_SPEC in 45e2acf (rebase: define options in OPTIONS_SPEC, 2011-02-28), the usage message included git-rebase [-i] --continue | --abort | --skip Remove the "[-i]" from this line. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-01git-rebase.sh: fix typo in an error messageRalf Thielow
Fix a typo in the error messages which is shown if it seems that a rebase is already in progress. Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-27rebase: remove obsolete and unused LONG_USAGE which breaks xgettextJiang Xin
Since there is a modern OPTIONS_SPEC variable in use in this script, the obsolete USAGE and LONG_USAGE variables are no longer used. Remove them. In addition, the obsolete LONG_USAGE variable has the following message in it: A'\''--B'\''--C'\'' And such complex LONG_USAGE message will break xgettext when extracting l10n messages (but if single quotes are removed from the message, xgettext works fine on 'git-rebase.sh'). Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-27i18n: Rewrite gettext messages start with dashJiang Xin
Gettext message in a shell script should not start with '-', one workaround is adding '--' between gettext and the message, like: gettext -- "--exec option ..." But due to a bug in the xgettext extraction, xgettext can not extract the actual message for this case. Rewriting the message is a simpler and better solution. Reported-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org> Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-25i18n: rebase: mark messages for translationJiang Xin
Mark messages in git-rebase.sh for translation. While doing this Jonathan noticed that the comma usage and sentence structure of the resolvemsg was not quite right, so correct that and its cousins in git-am.sh and t/t0201-gettext-fallbacks.sh at the same time. Some tests would start to fail with GETTEXT_POISON turned on after this update. Use test_i18ncmp and test_i18ngrep where appropriate to mark strings that should only be checked in the C locale output to avoid such issues. Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-07-16Merge branch 'cw/rebase-i-root'Junio C Hamano
"git rebase [-i] --root $tip" can now be used to rewrite all the history down to the root. * cw/rebase-i-root: t3404: make test 57 work with dash and others Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto rebase -i: support --root without --onto
2012-07-13Merge branch 'mz/rebase-no-mbox'Junio C Hamano
Teach "am --rebasing" codepath to grab authorship, log message and the patch text directly out of existing commits. This will help rebasing commits that have confusing "diff" output in their log messages. * mz/rebase-no-mbox: am: don't call mailinfo if $rebasing am --rebasing: get patch body from commit, not from mailbox rebase --root: print usage on too many args rebase: don't source git-sh-setup twice
2012-06-26rebase -i: support --root without --ontoChris Webb
Allow --root to be specified to rebase -i without --onto, making it possible to edit and re-order all commits right back to the root(s). If there is a conflict to be resolved when applying the first change, the user will expect a sane index and working tree to get sensible behaviour from git-diff and friends, so create a sentinel commit with an empty tree to rebase onto. Automatically squash the sentinel with any commits rebased directly onto it, so they end up as root commits in their own right and retain their authorship and commit message. Implicitly use rebase -i for non-interactive rebase of --root without an --onto argument now that rebase -i can correctly do this. Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-26rebase --root: print usage on too many argsMartin von Zweigbergk
Just like git rebase --onto newbase upstream branch error displays the usage message, so should clearly git rebase --onto newbase --root branch error , but it doesn't. Instead, it ignores both "branch" and "error" and rebases the current HEAD. This is because we try to match the number of remainging arguments "$#", which fails to match "1" argument and matches the "*" that really should have been a "0". Make sure we display usage information when too many arguments are given. Also fail-fast in case of similar bugs in the future by matching on exactly 0 arguments and failing on unknown numbers. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-13rebase -i: teach "--exec <cmd>"Lucien Kong
During an interactive rebase session, it is sometimes desirable to run tests on each commit in the resulting history. This can be done by adding "exec <test command>" when editing the insn sheet, but the command used for testing is often the same for all resulting commits. By passing "--exec <cmd>" from the command line, automatically add these "exec" lines after each commit in the final history. To work well with the --autosquash option, these are added at the end of each run of "fixup" and "squash". Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Lucien Kong <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Valentin Duperray <Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Franck Jonas <Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Thomas Nguy <Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen <Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-06-01Merge branch 'ef/maint-rebase-error-message'Junio C Hamano
By Erik Faye-Lund * ef/maint-rebase-error-message: rebase: report invalid commit correctly
2012-05-30rebase: report invalid commit correctlyErik Faye-Lund
In 9765b6a (rebase: align variable content, 2011-02-06), the code to error out was moved up one level. Unfortunately, one reference to a function parameter wasn't rewritten as it should, leading to the wrong parameter being errored on. This error was propagated by 71786f5 (rebase: factor out reference parsing, 2011-02-06) and merged in 78c6e0f (Merge branch 'mz/rebase', 2011-04-28). Correct this by reporting $onto_name istead. Reported-By: Manuela Hutter <manuelah@opera.com> Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-05-29Do not autosquash in case of an implied interactive rebaseVincent van Ravesteijn
The option to autosquash is only used in case of an interactive rebase. When merges are preserved, rebase uses an interactive rebase internally, but in this case autosquash should still be disabled. Signed-off-by: Vincent van Ravesteijn <vfr@lyx.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-24git-rebase: add keep_empty flagNeil Horman
Add a command line switch to git-rebase to allow a user the ability to specify that they want to keep any commits in a series that are empty. When git-rebase's type is am, then this option will automatically keep any commit that has a tree object identical to its parent. This patch changes the default behavior of interactive rebases as well. With this patch, git-rebase -i will produce a revision set passed to git-revision-editor, in which empty commits are commented out. Empty commits may be kept manually by uncommenting them. If the new --keep-empty option is used in an interactive rebase the empty commits will automatically all be uncommented in the editor. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-05Make git-{pull,rebase} message without tracking information friendlierCarlos Martín Nieto
The current message is too long and at too low a level for anybody to understand it if they don't know about the configuration format already. The text about setting up a remote is superfluous and doesn't help understand or recover from the error that has happened. Show the usage more prominently and explain how to set up the tracking information. If there is only one remote, that name is used instead of the generic <remote>. Also simplify the message we print on detached HEAD to remove unnecessary information which is better left for the documentation. Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-18Merge branch 'jk/pull-rebase-with-work-tree'Junio C Hamano
* jk/pull-rebase-with-work-tree: pull,rebase: handle GIT_WORK_TREE better Conflicts: git-pull.sh
2011-10-13pull,rebase: handle GIT_WORK_TREE betterJeff King
You can't currently run git-pull or git-rebase from outside of the work tree, even with GIT_WORK_TREE set, due to an overeager require_work_tree function. Commit e2eb527 documents this problem and provides the infrastructure for a fix, but left it to later commits to audit and update individual scripts. Changing these scripts to use require_work_tree_exists is easy to verify. We immediately call cd_to_toplevel, anyway. Therefore no matter which function we use, the state afterwards is one of: 1. We have a work tree, and we are at the top level. 2. We don't have a work tree, and we have died. The only catch is that we must also make sure no code that ran before the cd_to_toplevel assumed that we were already in the working tree. In this case, we will only have included shell libraries and called set_reflog_action, neither of which care about the current working directory at all. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-05misc-sh: fix up whitespace in some other .sh files.Jon Seymour
I found that the patched 4 files were different when this filter is applied. expand -i | unexpand --first-only This patch contains the corrected files. Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-07-22Merge branch 'mz/doc-rebase-abort'Junio C Hamano
* mz/doc-rebase-abort: rebase: clarify "restore the original branch"
2011-07-14rebase: clarify "restore the original branch"Martin von Zweigbergk
The description for 'git rebase --abort' currently says: Restore the original branch and abort the rebase operation. The "restore" can be misinterpreted to imply that the original branch was somehow in a broken state during the rebase operation. It is also not completely clear what "the original branch" is --- is it the branch that was checked out before the rebase operation was called or is the the branch that is being rebased (it is the latter)? Although both issues are made clear in the DESCRIPTION section, let us also make the entry in the OPTIONS secion more clear. Also remove the term "rebasing process" from the usage text, since the user already knows that the text is about "git rebase". Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-07-13Merge branch 'js/rebase-typo-branch-squelch-usage'Junio C Hamano
* js/rebase-typo-branch-squelch-usage: rebase: do not print lots of usage hints after an obvious error message
2011-06-29rebase: do not print lots of usage hints after an obvious error messageJohannes Sixt
When a non-existent branch was specified to be rebased, the complete usage information is printed after the error message that carries the relevant piece of information: $ git rebase master topci fatal: no such branch: topci usage: git rebase [-i] [options] [--onto <newbase>] [<upstream>] [<branch>] or: git rebase [-i] [options] --onto <newbase> --root [<branch>] or: git-rebase [-i] --continue | --abort | --skip Available options are [30 lines of usage stripped] The error message was introduced recently by 4ac5356c (rebase: give a better error message for bogus branch, 2011-01-27), and the result was acceptable because the usage text was just two lines. But 45e2acf3 (rebase: define options in OPTIONS_SPEC, 2011-02-28) made things worse because the usage text is now 35 lines. Just drop the usage information because it does not add value to the error message. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-27rebase: write a reflog entry when finishingJeff King
When we finish a rebase, our detached HEAD is at the final result. We update the original branch ref with this result, and then point the HEAD symbolic ref at the updated branch. We write a reflog for the branch update, but not for the update of HEAD. Because we're already at the final result on the detached HEAD, moving to the branch actually doesn't change our commit sha1 at all. So in that sense, a reflog entry would be pointless. However, humans do read reflogs, and an entry saying "rebase finished: returning to refs/heads/master" can be helpful in understanding what is going on. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-05-27rebase: create HEAD reflog entry when abortingCsaba Henk
When we abort a rebase, we return to the original value of HEAD. Failing to write a reflog entry means we create a gap in the reflog (which can cause "git show HEAD@{5.minutes.ago}" to issue a warning). Plus having the extra entry makes the reflog easier to follow for a human. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-05rebase: define options in OPTIONS_SPECMartin von Zweigbergk
Interactive rebase used to have its own command line processing. Since it used the 'git rev-parse --parseopt' functionality exposed through git-sh-setup, it had some flexibility, like matching prefixes of long options, that non-interactive rebase didn't. When interactive rebase's command line processing was factored out into git-rebase.sh in cf432ca (rebase: factor out command line option processing, 2011-02-06), this flexibility was lost. Give back that flexibility to interactive and non-interactive by defining its options in OPTIONS_SPEC. Also improve the usage message to contain the --continue, --skip and --abort sub commands. Reported-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specifiedMartin von Zweigbergk
'git rebase' without arguments is currently not supported. Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing. Defaulting to @{upstream} will make it possible to run e.g. 'git rebase -i' without arguments, which is probably a quite common use case. It also improves the scenario where you have multiple branches that rebase against a remote-tracking branch, where you currently have to choose between the extra network delay of 'git pull' or the slightly awkward keys to enter 'git rebase @{u}'. The error reporting when no upstream is configured for the current branch or when no branch is checked out is reused from git-pull.sh. A function is extracted into git-parse-remote.sh for this purpose. Helped-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase -m: remember allow_rerere_autoupdate optionMartin von Zweigbergk
If '--[no-]allow_rerere_autoupdate' is passed when 'git rebase -m' is called and a merge conflict occurs, the flag will be forgotten for the rest of the rebase process. Make rebase remember it by saving the value. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase: remember strategy and strategy optionsMartin von Zweigbergk
When a rebase is resumed, interactive rebase remembers any merge strategy passed when the rebase was initated. Make non-interactive rebase remember any merge strategy as well. Also make non-interactive rebase remember any merge strategy options. To be able to resume a rebase that was initiated with an older version of git (older than this commit), make sure not to expect the saved option files to exist. Test case idea taken from Junio's 71fc224 (t3402: test "rebase -s<strategy> -X<opt>", 2010-11-11). Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase: remember verbose optionMartin von Zweigbergk
Currently, only interactive rebase remembers the value of the '-v' flag from the initial invocation. Make non-interactive rebase also remember it. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase: extract code for writing basic stateMartin von Zweigbergk
Extract the code for writing the state to rebase-apply/ or rebase-merge/ when a rebase is initiated. This will make it easier to later make both interactive and non-interactive rebase remember the options used. Note that non-interactive rebase stores the sha1 of the original head in a file called orig-head, while interactive rebase stores it in a file called head. Change this by writing to orig-head in both cases. When reading, try to read from orig-head. If that fails, read from head instead. This protects users who upgraded git while they had an ongoing interactive rebase, while still making it possible to remove the code that reads from head at some point in the future. Helped-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase: factor out sub command handlingMartin von Zweigbergk
Factor out the common parts of the handling of the sub commands '--continue', '--skip' and '--abort'. The '--abort' handling can handled completely in git-rebase.sh. After this refactoring, the calls to git-rebase--am.sh, git-rebase--merge.sh and git-rebase--interactive.sh will be better aligned. There will only be one call to interactive rebase that will shortcut the very last part of git-rebase.sh. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-10rebase: make -v a tiny bit more verboseMartin von Zweigbergk
To make it possible to later remove the handling of --abort from git-rebase--interactive.sh, align the implementation in git-rebase.sh with the former by making it a bit more verbose. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>