summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/git-pull.sh
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-03-20Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano
* maint: Update draft release notes to 1.7.0.3 fetch: Fix minor memory leak fetch: Future-proof initialization of a refspec on stack fetch: Check for a "^{}" suffix with suffixcmp() daemon: parse_host_and_port SIGSEGV if port is specified Makefile: Fix CDPATH problem pull: replace unnecessary sed invocation
2010-03-20pull: replace unnecessary sed invocationStephen Boyd
Getting the shortened branch name is as easy as using the shell's parameter expansion. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-24fetch and pull: learn --progressTay Ray Chuan
Note that in the documentation for git-pull, documentation for the --progress option is displayed under the "Options related to fetching" subtitle via fetch-options.txt. Also, update the documentation of the -q/--quiet option for git-pull to mention its effect on progress reporting during fetching. Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-24pull: re-fix command line generationJunio C Hamano
14e5d40 (pull: Fix parsing of -X<option>, 2010-01-17) forgot that merge_name needs to stay as a single non-interpolated string. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-21Merge branch 'ap/merge-backend-opts'Junio C Hamano
* ap/merge-backend-opts: Document that merge strategies can now take their own options Extend merge-subtree tests to test -Xsubtree=dir. Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive. pull: Fix parsing of -X<option> Teach git-pull to pass -X<option> to git-merge git merge -X<option> git-merge-file --ours, --theirs Conflicts: git-compat-util.h
2010-01-18pull: Fix parsing of -X<option>Junio C Hamano
As -X parameter can contain arbitrary $IFS characters, we need to properly quote it from the shell while forming the command line. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-18Teach git-pull to pass -X<option> to git-mergeAvery Pennarun
This needs the usual sq then eval trick to allow IFS characters in the option. Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-12Be more user-friendly when refusing to do something because of conflict.Matthieu Moy
Various commands refuse to run in the presence of conflicts (commit, merge, pull, cherry-pick/revert). They all used to provide rough, and inconsistant error messages. A new variable advice.resolveconflict is introduced, and allows more verbose messages, pointing the user to the appropriate solution. For commit, the error message used to look like this: $ git commit foo.txt: needs merge foo.txt: unmerged (c34a92682e0394bc0d6f4d4a67a8e2d32395c169) foo.txt: unmerged (3afcd75de8de0bb5076942fcb17446be50451030) foo.txt: unmerged (c9785d77b76dfe4fb038bf927ee518f6ae45ede4) error: Error building trees The "need merge" line is given by refresh_cache. We add the IN_PORCELAIN option to make the output more consistant with the other porcelain commands, and catch the error in return, to stop with a clean error message. The next lines were displayed by a call to cache_tree_update(), which is not reached anymore if we noticed the conflict. The new output looks like: U foo.txt fatal: 'commit' is not possible because you have unmerged files. Please, fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>' as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit, or use 'git commit -a'. Pull is slightly modified to abort immediately if $GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD exists instead of waiting for merge to complain. The behavior of merge and the test-case are slightly modified to reflect the usual flow: start with conflicts, fix them, and afterwards get rid of MERGE_HEAD, with different error messages at each stage. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-09Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano
* maint: add-interactive: fix deletion of non-empty files pull: clarify advice for the unconfigured error case
2009-12-08Revert recent "git merge <msg> HEAD <commit>..." deprecationJunio C Hamano
This reverts commit c0ecb07048ce2123589a2f077d296e8cf29a9570 "git-pull.sh: Fix call to git-merge for new command format" and commit b81e00a965c62ca72a4b9db425ee173de147808d "git-merge: a deprecation notice of the ancient command line syntax". They caused a "git pull" (without any arguments, and without any local commits---only to update to the other side) to warn that commit log message is ignored because the merge resulted in a fast-forward. Another possible solution is to add an extra option to "git merge" so that "git pull" can tell it that the message given is not coming from the end user (the canned message is passed just in case the merge resulted in a non-ff and caused commit), but I think it is easier _not_ to deprecate the old syntax. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-03pull: clarify advice for the unconfigured error caseJan Krüger
When pull --rebase fails because it cannot find what branch to merge against, the error message implies we are trying to merge. Say "rebase against" instead of "merge with" to avoid confusion. The configuration suggested to remedy the situation uses a confusing syntax, with variables specified in the dotted form accepted by 'git config' but separated from their values by the '=' delimiter used by config files. Since the user will have to edit this output anyway, it is more helpful to provide a config file snippet to paste into an editor and modify. Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-12-02git-pull.sh: Fix call to git-merge for new command formatHorst H. von Brand
Now "git merge <msg> HEAD" is officially deprecated, we should clean our own use as well. Signed-off-by: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-16Merge branch 'fc/doc-fast-forward'Junio C Hamano
* fc/doc-fast-forward: Use 'fast-forward' all over the place Conflicts: builtin-merge.c
2009-10-30Teach 'git merge' and 'git pull' the option --ff-onlyBjörn Gustavsson
For convenience in scripts and aliases, add the option --ff-only to only allow fast-forwards (and up-to-date, despite the name). Disallow combining --ff-only and --no-ff, since they flatly contradict each other. Allow all other options to be combined with --ff-only (i.e. do not add any code to handle them specially), including the following options: * --strategy (one or more): As long as the chosen merge strategy results in up-to-date or fast-forward, the command will succeed. * --squash: I cannot imagine why anyone would want to squash commits only if fast-forward is possible, but I also see no reason why it should not be allowed. * --message: The message will always be ignored, but I see no need to explicitly disallow providing a redundant message. Acknowledgements: I did look at Yuval Kogman's earlier patch (107768 in gmane), mainly as shortcut to find my way in the code, but I did not copy anything directly. Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-25Use 'fast-forward' all over the placeFelipe Contreras
It's a compound word. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-09pull: improve advice for unconfigured error caseJeff King
There are several reasons a git-pull invocation might not have anything marked for merge: 1. We're not on a branch, so there is no branch configuration. 2. We're on a branch, but there is no configuration for this branch. 3. We fetched from the configured remote, but the configured branch to merge didn't get fetched (either it doesn't exist, or wasn't part of the fetch refspec). 4. We fetched from the non-default remote, but didn't specify a branch to merge. We can't use the configured one because it applies to the default remote. 5. We fetched from a specified remote, and a refspec was given, but it ended up not fetching anything (this is actually hard to do; if the refspec points to a remote branch and it doesn't exist, then fetch will fail and we never make it to this code path. But if you provide a wildcard refspec like refs/bogus/*:refs/remotes/origin/* then you can see this failure). We have handled (1) and (2) for some time. Recently, commit a6dbf88 added code to handle case (3). This patch handles cases (4) and (5), which previously just fell under other cases, producing a confusing message. While we're at it, let's rewrap the text for case (3), which looks terribly ugly as it is. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-05git-pull: dead code removalJunio C Hamano
Back when a74b170 (git-pull: disallow implicit merging to detached HEAD, 2007-01-15) added this check, $? referred to the error status of reading HEAD as a symbolic-ref; but cd67e4d (Teach 'git pull' about --rebase, 2007-11-28) moved the command away from where the check is, and nobody noticed the breakage. Ever since, $? has always been 0 (tr at the end of the pipe to find merge_head never fails) and other case arms were never reached. These days, error_on_no_merge_candidates function is prepared to handle a detached HEAD case, which was what the code this patch removes used to handle. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-09-23pull: Clarify "helpful" message for another corner casev1.6.5-rc2Junio C Hamano
When the remote branch we asked for merging did not exist in the set of fetched refs, we unconditionally hinted that it was because of lack of configuration. It is not necessarily so, and risks sending users for a wild goose chase. Make sure to check if that is indeed the case before telling a wild guess to the user. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-12allow pull --rebase on branch yet to be bornJeff King
When doing a "pull --rebase", we check to make sure that the index and working tree are clean. The index-clean check compares the index against HEAD. The test erroneously reports dirtiness if we don't have a HEAD yet. In such an "unborn branch" case, by definition, a non-empty index won't be based on whatever we are pulling down from the remote, and will lose the local change. Just check if $GIT_DIR/index exists and error out. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-19pull: support rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebaseSanti Béjar
You cannot do a "git pull --rebase" with a rebased upstream, if you have already run "git fetch". Try to behave as if the "git fetch" was not run. In other words, find the fork point of the current branch, where the tip of upstream branch used to be, and use it as the upstream parameter of "git rebase". This patch computes the fork point by walking the reflog to find the first commit which is an ancestor of the current branch. Maybe there are smarter ways to compute it, but this is a straight forward implementation. Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-21Merge branch 'sb/pull-rebase'Junio C Hamano
* sb/pull-rebase: parse-remote: remove unused functions parse-remote: support default reflist in get_remote_merge_branch parse-remote: function to get the tracking branch to be merge
2009-06-15pull, rebase: simplify to use die()Stephen Boyd
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-12parse-remote: function to get the tracking branch to be mergeSanti Béjar
The only user of get_remote_refs_for_fetch was "git pull --rebase" and it only wanted the tracking branch to be merge. So, add a simple function (get_remote_merge_branch) with this new meaning. No behavior changes. The new function behaves like the old code in "git pull --rebase". In particular, it only works with the default refspec mapping and with remote branches, not tags. Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <santi@agolina.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-23Convert to use quiet option when availableDan Loewenherz
A minor fix that eliminates usage of "2>/dev/null" when --quiet or -q has already been implemented. Signed-off-by: Dan Loewenherz <daniel.loewenherz@yale.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-09Merge branch 'maint'Junio C Hamano
* maint: Start 1.6.2.3 preparation process_{tree,blob}: Remove useless xstrdup calls git-pull.sh: better warning message for "git pull" on detached head. Conflicts: RelNotes
2009-04-08git-pull.sh: better warning message for "git pull" on detached head.Matthieu Moy
Otherwise, git complains about not finding a branch to pull from in 'branch..merge', which is hardly understandable. While we're there, reword the sentences slightly. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-03git-pull: Allow --stat and --no-stat to be used with --rebaseTor Arne Vestbø
Forwards the --stat, --no-stat, and --summary options on to git-rebase. Signed-off-by: Tor Arne Vestbø <torarnv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-18disallow providing multiple upstream branches to rebase, pull --rebaseJay Soffian
It does not make sense to provide multiple upstream branches to either git pull --rebase, or to git rebase, so disallow both. Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-12-03pull: use git rev-parse -qMiklos Vajna
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-19Retain multiple -q/-v occurrences in git pullTuncer Ayaz
To support counting -q/-v options in git pull retain them by concatenating. Signed-off-by: Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-11-15Teach/Fix pull/fetch -q/-v optionsTuncer Ayaz
Implement git-pull --quiet and git-pull --verbose by adding the options to git-pull and fixing verbosity handling in git-fetch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-10-17pull: allow "git pull origin $something:$current_branch" into an unborn branchJunio C Hamano
Some misguided documents floating on the Net suggest this sequence: mkdir newdir && cd newdir git init git remote add origin $url git pull origin master:master "git pull" has known about misguided "pull" that lets the underlying fetch update the current branch for a long time. It also has known about "git pull origin master" into a branch yet to be born. These two workarounds however were not aware of the existence of each other and did not work well together. This fixes it. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-23Ignore dirty submodule states in "git pull --rebase"Johannes Schindelin
This is a companion patch to 6848d58c(Ignore dirty submodule states during rebase and stash). Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-07-13Make usage strings dash-lessStephan Beyer
When you misuse a git command, you are shown the usage string. But this is currently shown in the dashed form. So if you just copy what you see, it will not work, when the dashed form is no longer supported. This patch makes git commands show the dash-less version. For shell scripts that do not specify OPTIONS_SPEC, git-sh-setup.sh generates a dash-less usage string now. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-23pull --rebase: exit early when the working directory is dirtyJohannes Schindelin
When rebasing fails during "pull --rebase", you cannot just clean up the working directory and call "pull --rebase" again, since the remote branch was already fetched. Therefore, die early when the working directory is dirty. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-04-13merge, pull: add '--(no-)log' command line optionSZEDER Gábor
These are the command line option equivalents of the 'merge.log' config variable. The patch also updates documentation and bash completion accordingly, and adds a test. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-04-13merge, pull: introduce '--(no-)stat' optionSZEDER Gábor
This option has the same effect as '--(no-)summary' (i.e. whether to show a diffsat at the end of the merge or not), and it is consistent with the '--stat' option of other git commands. Documentation, tests, and bash completion are updaed accordingly, and the old --summary option is marked as being deprected. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-23pull: pass --strategy along to to rebaseJay Soffian
rebase supports --strategy, so pull should pass the option along to it. Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-01-27pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branchesJohannes Schindelin
When the upstream branch is tracked, we can detect if that branch was rebased since it was last fetched. Teach git to use that information to rebase from the old remote head onto the new remote head. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-12-29"git pull --tags": error out with a better message.Junio C Hamano
When "git pull --tags" is run without any other arguments, the standard error message "You told me to fetch and merge stuff but there is nothing to merge! You might want to fix your config" is given. While the error may be technically correct, fixing the config would not help, as "git pull --tags" itself tells "git fetch" not to use the configured refspecs. This commit makes "git pull --tags" to issue a different error message to avoid confusion. This is merely an interim solution. In the longer term, it would be a better approach to change the semantics of --tags option to make "git fetch" and "git pull" to: (1) behave as if no --tags was given (so an explicit refspec on the command line overrides configured ones, or no explicit refspecs on the command line takes configured ones); but (2) no auto-following of tags is made even when using configured refspecs; and (3) fetch all tags as not-for-merge entries". Then we would not need to have this separate error message, as the ordinary merge will happen even with the --tags option. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-29Teach 'git pull' about --rebaseJohannes Schindelin
When calling 'git pull' with the '--rebase' option, it performs a fetch + rebase instead of a fetch + merge. This behavior is more desirable than fetch + pull when a topic branch is ready to be submitted and needs to be update. fetch + rebase might also be considered a better workflow with shared repositories in any case, or for contributors to a centrally managed repository, such as WINE's. As a convenience, you can set the default behavior for a branch by defining the config variable branch.<name>.rebase, which is interpreted as a bool. This setting can be overridden on the command line by --rebase and --no-rebase. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-11-06scripts: Add placeholders for OPTIONS_SPECJunio C Hamano
--text follows this line-- These commands currently lack OPTIONS_SPEC; allow people to easily list with "git grep 'OPTIONS_SPEC=$'" what they can help improving. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-29Teach git-pull about --[no-]ff, --no-squash and --commitLars Hjemli
These options are supported by git-merge, but git-pull didn't know about them. Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-10-03Make git-pull complain and give advice when there is nothing to merge withFederico Mena Quintero
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-09-23Supplant the "while case ... break ;; esac" idiomDavid Kastrup
A lot of shell scripts contained stuff starting with while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac and similar. I consider breaking out of the condition instead of the body od the loop ugly, and the implied "true" value of the non-matching case is not really obvious to humans at first glance. It happens not to be obvious to some BSD shells, either, but that's because they are not POSIX-compliant. In most cases, this has been replaced by a straight condition using "test". "case" has the advantage of being faster than "test" on vintage shells where "test" is not a builtin. Since none of them is likely to run the git scripts, anyway, the added readability should be worth the change. A few loops have had their termination condition expressed differently. Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-07-03Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz"Junio C Hamano
This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-05-25Add a configuration option to control diffstat after mergeAlex Riesen
The diffstat can be controlled either with command-line options (--summary|--no-summary) or with merge.diffstat. The default is left as it was: diffstat is active by default. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-15git-pull: disallow implicit merging to detached HEADJeff King
Instead, we complain to the user and suggest that they explicitly specify the remote and branch. We depend on the exit status of git-symbolic-ref, so let's go ahead and document that. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-13Allow whole-tree operations to be started from a subdirectoryJunio C Hamano
This updates five commands (merge, pull, rebase, revert and cherry-pick) so that they can be started from a subdirectory. This may not actually be what we want to do. These commands are inherently whole-tree operations, and an inexperienced user may mistakenly expect a "git pull" from a subdirectory would merge only the subdirectory the command started from. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-10Disallow working directory commands in a bare repository.Shawn O. Pearce
If the user tries to run a porcelainish command which requires a working directory in a bare repository they may get unexpected results which are difficult to predict and may differ from command to command. Instead we should detect that the current repository is a bare repository and refuse to run the command there, as there is no working directory associated with it. [jc: updated Shawn's original somewhat -- bugs are mine.] Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>