| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add a semantic patch for replace ALLOC_ARRAY+COPY_ARRAY with DUP_ARRAY
to reduce code duplication and apply its results.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Some of the rules for using COPY_ARRAY instead of memcpy with sizeof are
intended to reduce the number of sizeof variants to deal with. They can
have unintended side effects if only they match, but not the one for the
COPY_ARRAY conversion at the end.
Avoid these side effects by instead using a self-contained rule for each
combination of array and pointer for source and destination which lists
all sizeof variants inline.
This lets "make contrib/coccinelle/array.cocci.patch" take 15% longer on
my machine, but gives peace of mind that no incomplete transformation
will be generated.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Allocating a pre-cleared single element is quite common and it is
misleading to use CALLOC_ARRAY(); these allocations that would be
affected without this change are not allocating an array.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add and apply a semantic patch for converting code that open-codes
CALLOC_ARRAY to use it instead. It shortens the code and infers the
element size automatically.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The current semantic patch for COPY_ARRAY transforms memcpy(3) calls on
pointers, but Coccinelle distinguishes them from arrays. It already
contains three rules to handle the options for sizeof (i.e. source,
destination and type), and handling arrays as source and destination
would require four times as many rules if we enumerated all cases.
We also don't handle array subscripts, and supporting that would
increase the number of rules by another factor of four. (An isomorphism
telling Coccinelle that "sizeof x[...]" is equivalent to "sizeof *x"
would be nice..)
Support arrays and array subscripts, but keep the number of rules down
by adding normalization steps: First turn array subscripts into
derefences, then determine the types of expressions used with sizeof and
replace them with these types, and then convert the different possible
combinations of arrays and pointers with memcpy(3) to COPY_ARRAY.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Transformations that hide multiplications can end up with an pair of
parentheses that is no longer needed. E.g. with a rule like this:
@@
expression E;
@@
- E * 2
+ double(E)
... we might get a patch like this:
- x = (a + b) * 2;
+ x = double((a + b));
Add a pair of parentheses to the preimage side of such rules.
Coccinelle will generate patches that remove them if they are present,
and it will still match expressions that lack them.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Similar to COPY_ARRAY (introduced in 60566cbb58), add a safe and
convenient helper for moving potentially overlapping ranges of array
entries. It infers the element size, multiplies automatically and
safely to get the size in bytes, does a basic type safety check by
comparing element sizes and unlike memmove(3) it supports NULL
pointers iff 0 elements are to be moved.
Also add a semantic patch to demonstrate the helper's intended usage.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a semantic patch for using ALLOC_ARRAY to allocate arrays and apply
the transformation on the current source tree. The macro checks for
multiplication overflow and infers the element size automatically; the
result is shorter and safer code.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add a semantic patch for converting certain calls of memcpy(3) to
COPY_ARRAY() and apply that transformation to the code base. The result
is
shorter and safer code. For now only consider calls where source and
destination have the same type, or in other words: easy cases.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
