summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/commit.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-04-08Merge branch 'bp/commit-p-editor' into maintJunio C Hamano
* bp/commit-p-editor: run-command: mark run_hook_with_custom_index as deprecated merge hook tests: fix and update tests merge: fix GIT_EDITOR override for commit hook commit: fix patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m" test patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m" merge hook tests: use 'test_must_fail' instead of '!' merge hook tests: fix missing '&&' in test
2014-03-18commit: fix patch hunk editing with "commit -p -m"Benoit Pierre
Don't change git environment: move the GIT_EDITOR=":" override to the hook command subprocess, like it's already done for GIT_INDEX_FILE. Signed-off-by: Benoit Pierre <benoit.pierre@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-27shallow: automatically clean up shallow tempfilesJeff King
We sometimes write tempfiles of the form "shallow_XXXXXX" during fetch/push operations with shallow repositories. Under normal circumstances, we clean up the result when we are done. However, we do no take steps to clean up after ourselves when we exit due to die() or signal death. This patch teaches the tempfile creation code to register handlers to clean up after ourselves. To handle this, we change the ownership semantics of the filename returned by setup_temporary_shallow. It now keeps a copy of the filename itself, and returns only a const pointer to it. We can also do away with explicit tempfile removal in the callers. They all exit not long after finishing with the file, so they can rely on the auto-cleanup, simplifying the code. Note that we keep things simple and maintain only a single filename to be cleaned. This is sufficient for the current caller, but we future-proof it with a die("BUG"). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-17Merge branch 'nd/shallow-clone'Junio C Hamano
Fetching from a shallow-cloned repository used to be forbidden, primarily because the codepaths involved were not carefully vetted and we did not bother supporting such usage. This attempts to allow object transfer out of a shallow-cloned repository in a controlled way (i.e. the receiver become a shallow repository with truncated history). * nd/shallow-clone: (31 commits) t5537: fix incorrect expectation in test case 10 shallow: remove unused code send-pack.c: mark a file-local function static git-clone.txt: remove shallow clone limitations prune: clean .git/shallow after pruning objects clone: use git protocol for cloning shallow repo locally send-pack: support pushing from a shallow clone via http receive-pack: support pushing to a shallow clone via http smart-http: support shallow fetch/clone remote-curl: pass ref SHA-1 to fetch-pack as well send-pack: support pushing to a shallow clone receive-pack: allow pushes that update .git/shallow connected.c: add new variant that runs with --shallow-file add GIT_SHALLOW_FILE to propagate --shallow-file to subprocesses receive/send-pack: support pushing from a shallow clone receive-pack: reorder some code in unpack() fetch: add --update-shallow to accept refs that update .git/shallow upload-pack: make sure deepening preserves shallow roots fetch: support fetching from a shallow repository clone: support remote shallow repository ...
2014-01-10Merge branch 'nd/commit-tree-constness'Junio C Hamano
Code clean-up. * nd/commit-tree-constness: commit.c: make "tree" a const pointer in commit_tree*()
2014-01-06shallow: remove unused codeRamsay Jones
Commit 58babfff ("shallow.c: the 8 steps to select new commits for .git/shallow", 05-12-2013) added a function to implement step 5 of the quoted eight steps, namely 'remove_nonexistent_ours_in_pack()'. This function implements an optional optimization step in the new shallow commit selection algorithm. However, this function has no callers. (The commented out call sites would need to change, in order to provide information required by the function.) Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Acked-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-26commit.c: make "tree" a const pointer in commit_tree*()Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-11prune: clean .git/shallow after pruning objectsNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
This patch teaches "prune" to remove shallow roots that are no longer reachable from any refs (e.g. when the relevant refs are removed). Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-11receive-pack: allow pushes that update .git/shallowNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
The basic 8 steps to update .git/shallow does not fully apply here because the user may choose to accept just a few refs (while fetch always accepts all refs). The steps are modified a bit. 1-6. same as before. After calling assign_shallow_commits_to_refs at step 6, each shallow commit has a bitmap that marks all refs that require it. 7. mark all "ours" shallow commits that are reachable from any refs. We will need to do the original step 7 on them later. 8. go over all shallow commit bitmaps, mark refs that require new shallow commits. 9. setup a strict temporary shallow file to plug all the holes, even if it may cut some of our history short. This file is used by all hooks. The hooks could use --shallow-file=$GIT_DIR/shallow to overcome this and reach everything in current repo. 10. go over the new refs one by one. For each ref, do the reachability test if it needs a shallow commit on the list from step 7. Remove it if it's reachable from our refs. Gather all required shallow commits, run check_everything_connected() with the new ref, then install them to .git/shallow. This mode is disabled by default and can be turned on with receive.shallowupdate Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-11add GIT_SHALLOW_FILE to propagate --shallow-file to subprocessesNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
This may be needed when a hook is run after a new shallow pack is received, but .git/shallow is not settled yet. A temporary shallow file to plug all loose ends should be used instead. GIT_SHALLOW_FILE is overriden by --shallow-file. --shallow-file does not work in this case because the hook may spawn many git subprocesses and the launch commands do not have --shallow-file as it's a recent addition. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-11shallow.c: steps 6 and 7 to select new commits for .git/shallowNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-11shallow.c: the 8 steps to select new commits for .git/shallowNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Suppose a fetch or push is requested between two shallow repositories (with no history deepening or shortening). A pack that contains necessary objects is transferred over together with .git/shallow of the sender. The receiver has to determine whether it needs to update .git/shallow if new refs needs new shallow comits. The rule here is avoid updating .git/shallow by default. But we don't want to waste the received pack. If the pack contains two refs, one needs new shallow commits installed in .git/shallow and one does not, we keep the latter and reject/warn about the former. Even if .git/shallow update is allowed, we only add shallow commits strictly necessary for the former ref (remember the sender can send more shallow commits than necessary) and pay attention not to accidentally cut the receiver history short (no history shortening is asked for) So the steps to figure out what ref need what new shallow commits are: 1. Split the sender shallow commit list into "ours" and "theirs" list by has_sha1_file. Those that exist in current repo in "ours", the remaining in "theirs". 2. Check the receiver .git/shallow, remove from "ours" the ones that also exist in .git/shallow. 3. Fetch the new pack. Either install or unpack it. 4. Do has_sha1_file on "theirs" list again. Drop the ones that fail has_sha1_file. Obviously the new pack does not need them. 5. If the pack is kept, remove from "ours" the ones that do not exist in the new pack. 6. Walk the new refs to answer the question "what shallow commits, both ours and theirs, are required in .git/shallow in order to add this ref?". Shallow commits not associated to any refs are removed from their respective list. 7. (*) Check reachability (from the current refs) of all remaining commits in "ours". Those reachable are removed. We do not want to cut any part of our (reachable) history. We only check up commits. True reachability test is done by check_everything_connected() at the end as usual. 8. Combine the final "ours" and "theirs" and add them all to .git/shallow. Install new refs. The case where some hook rejects some refs on a push is explained in more detail in the push patches. Of these steps, #6 and #7 are expensive. Both require walking through some commits, or in the worst case all commits. And we rather avoid them in at least common case, where the transferred pack does not contain any shallow commits that the sender advertises. Let's look at each scenario: 1) the sender has longer history than the receiver All shallow commits from the sender will be put into "theirs" list at step 1 because none of them exists in current repo. In the common case, "theirs" becomes empty at step 4 and exit early. 2) the sender has shorter history than the receiver All shallow commits from the sender are likely in "ours" list at step 1. In the common case, if the new pack is kept, we could empty "ours" and exit early at step 5. If the pack is not kept, we hit the expensive step 6 then exit after "ours" is emptied. There'll be only a handful of objects to walk in fast-forward case. If it's forced update, we may need to walk to the bottom. 3) the sender has same .git/shallow as the receiver This is similar to case 2 except that "ours" should be emptied at step 2 and exit early. A fetch after "clone --depth=X" is case 1. A fetch after "clone" (from a shallow repo) is case 3. Luckily they're cheap for the common case. A push from "clone --depth=X" falls into case 2, which is expensive. Some more work may be done at the sender/client side to avoid more work on the server side: if the transferred pack does not contain any shallow commits, send-pack should not send any shallow commits to the receive-pack, effectively turning it into a normal push and avoid all steps. This patch implements all steps except #3, already handled by fetch-pack and receive-pack, #6 and #7, which has their own patch due to their size. (*) in previous versions step 7 was put before step 3. I reorder it so that the common case that keeps the pack does not need to walk commits at all. In future if we implement faster commit reachability check (maybe with the help of pack bitmaps or commit cache), step 7 could become cheap and be moved up before 6 again. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-11shallow.c: extend setup_*_shallow() to accept extra shallow commitsNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-11make the sender advertise shallow commits to the receiverNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
If either receive-pack or upload-pack is called on a shallow repository, shallow commits (*) will be sent after the ref advertisement (but before the packet flush), so that the receiver has the full "shape" of the sender's commit graph. This will be needed for the receiver to update its .git/shallow if necessary. This breaks the protocol for all clients trying to push to a shallow repo, or fetch from one. Which is basically the same end result as today's "is_repository_shallow() && die()" in receive-pack and upload-pack. New clients will be made aware of shallow upstream and can make use of this information. The sender must send all shallow commits that are sent in the following pack. It may send more shallow commits than necessary. upload-pack for example may choose to advertise no shallow commits if it knows in advance that the pack it's going to send contains no shallow commits. But upload-pack is the server, so we choose the cheaper way, send full .git/shallow and let the client deal with it. Smart HTTP is not affected by this patch. Shallow support on smart-http comes later separately. (*) A shallow commit is a commit that terminates the revision walker. It is usually put in .git/shallow in order to keep the revision walker from going out of bound because there is no guarantee that objects behind this commit is available. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-12-05Merge branch 'jk/robustify-parse-commit'Junio C Hamano
* jk/robustify-parse-commit: checkout: do not die when leaving broken detached HEAD use parse_commit_or_die instead of custom message use parse_commit_or_die instead of segfaulting assume parse_commit checks for NULL commit assume parse_commit checks commit->object.parsed log_tree_diff: die when we fail to parse a commit
2013-10-24log_tree_diff: die when we fail to parse a commitJeff King
We currently call parse_commit and then assume we can dereference the resulting "tree" struct field. If parsing failed, however, that field is NULL and we end up segfaulting. Instead of a segfault, let's print an error message and die a little more gracefully. Note that this should never happen in practice, but may happen in a corrupt repository. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-09-20Merge branch 'nd/fetch-into-shallow'Junio C Hamano
When there is no sufficient overlap between old and new history during a fetch into a shallow repository, we unnecessarily sent objects the sending side knows the receiving end has. * nd/fetch-into-shallow: Add testcase for needless objects during a shallow fetch list-objects: mark more commits as edges in mark_edges_uninteresting list-objects: reduce one argument in mark_edges_uninteresting upload-pack: delegate rev walking in shallow fetch to pack-objects shallow: add setup_temporary_shallow() shallow: only add shallow graft points to new shallow file move setup_alternate_shallow and write_shallow_commits to shallow.c
2013-09-09Merge branch 'jl/submodule-mv'Junio C Hamano
"git mv A B" when moving a submodule A does "the right thing", inclusing relocating its working tree and adjusting the paths in the .gitmodules file. * jl/submodule-mv: (53 commits) rm: delete .gitmodules entry of submodules removed from the work tree mv: update the path entry in .gitmodules for moved submodules submodule.c: add .gitmodules staging helper functions mv: move submodules using a gitfile mv: move submodules together with their work trees rm: do not set a variable twice without intermediate reading. t6131 - skip tests if on case-insensitive file system parse_pathspec: accept :(icase)path syntax pathspec: support :(glob) syntax pathspec: make --literal-pathspecs disable pathspec magic pathspec: support :(literal) syntax for noglob pathspec kill limit_pathspec_to_literal() as it's only used by parse_pathspec() parse_pathspec: preserve prefix length via PATHSPEC_PREFIX_ORIGIN parse_pathspec: make sure the prefix part is wildcard-free rename field "raw" to "_raw" in struct pathspec tree-diff: remove the use of pathspec's raw[] in follow-rename codepath remove match_pathspec() in favor of match_pathspec_depth() remove init_pathspec() in favor of parse_pathspec() remove diff_tree_{setup,release}_paths convert common_prefix() to use struct pathspec ...
2013-09-09Merge branch 'tr/log-full-diff-keep-true-parents'Junio C Hamano
Output from "git log --full-diff -- <pathspec>" looked strange, because comparison was done with the previous ancestor that touched the specified <pathspec>, causing the patches for paths outside the pathspec to show more than the single commit has changed. Tweak "git reflog -p" for the same reason using the same mechanism. * tr/log-full-diff-keep-true-parents: log: use true parents for diff when walking reflogs log: use true parents for diff even when rewriting
2013-08-28shallow: add setup_temporary_shallow()Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
This function is like setup_alternate_shallow() except that it does not lock $GIT_DIR/shallow. It is supposed to be used when a program generates temporary shallow for use by another program, then throw the shallow file away. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-18move setup_alternate_shallow and write_shallow_commits to shallow.cNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-08-01log: use true parents for diff even when rewritingThomas Rast
When using pathspec filtering in combination with diff-based log output, parent simplification happens before the diff is computed. The diff is therefore against the *simplified* parents. This works okay, arguably by accident, in the normal case: simplification reduces to one parent as long as the commit is TREESAME to it. So the simplified parent of any given commit must have the same tree contents on the filtered paths as its true (unfiltered) parent. However, --full-diff breaks this guarantee, and indeed gives pretty spectacular results when comparing the output of git log --graph --stat ... git log --graph --full-diff --stat ... (--graph internally kicks in parent simplification, much like --parents). To fix it, store a copy of the parent list before simplification (in a slab) whenever --full-diff is in effect. Then use the stored parents instead of the simplified ones in the commit display code paths. The latter do not actually check for --full-diff to avoid duplicated code; they just grab the original parents if save_parents() has not been called for this revision walk. For ordinary commits it should be obvious that this is the right thing to do. Merge commits are a bit subtle. Observe that with default simplification, merge simplification is an all-or-nothing decision: either the merge is TREESAME to one parent and disappears, or it is different from all parents and the parent list remains intact. Redundant parents are not pruned, so the existing code also shows them as a merge. So if we do show a merge commit, the parent list just consists of the rewrite result on each parent. Running, e.g., --cc on this in --full-diff mode is not very useful: if any commits were skipped, some hunks will disagree with all sides of the merge (with one side, because commits were skipped; with the others, because they didn't have those changes in the first place). This triggers --cc showing these hunks spuriously. Therefore I believe that even for merge commits it is better to show the diffs wrt. the original parents. Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-25commit.h: drop redundant commentJeff King
We mention twice that the from_ident field of struct pretty_print_context is internal. The first comment was added by 10f2fbf, which prepares the struct for internal fields, and then the second by a908047, which actually adds such a field. This was a mistake made when re-rolling the series on the list; the comment should have been removed from the latter commit. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15convert run_add_interactive to use struct pathspecNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
This passes the pathspec, more or less unmodified, to git-add--interactive. The command itself does not process pathspec. It simply passes the pathspec to other builtin commands. So if all those commands support pathspec, we're good. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-15Merge branch 'jk/format-patch-from'Junio C Hamano
"git format-patch" learned "--from[=whom]" option, which sets the "From: " header to the specified person (or the person who runs the command, if "=whom" part is missing) and move the original author information to an in-body From: header as necessary. * jk/format-patch-from: teach format-patch to place other authors into in-body "From" pretty.c: drop const-ness from pretty_print_context
2013-07-03teach format-patch to place other authors into in-body "From"Jeff King
Format-patch generates emails with the "From" address set to the author of each patch. If you are going to send the emails, however, you would want to replace the author identity with yours (if they are not the same), and bump the author identity to an in-body header. Normally this is handled by git-send-email, which does the transformation before sending out the emails. However, some workflows may not use send-email (e.g., imap-send, or a custom script which feeds the mbox to a non-git MUA). They could each implement this feature themselves, but getting it right is non-trivial (one must canonicalize the identities by reversing any RFC2047 encoding or RFC822 quoting of the headers, which has caused many bugs in send-email over the years). This patch takes a different approach: it teaches format-patch a "--from" option which handles the ident check and in-body header while it is writing out the email. It's much simpler to do at this level (because we haven't done any quoting yet), and any workflow based on format-patch can easily turn it on. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-03pretty.c: drop const-ness from pretty_print_contextJeff King
In the current code, callers are expected to fill in the pretty_print_context, and then the pretty.c functions simply read from it. This leaves no room for the pretty.c functions to communicate with each other by manipulating the context (e.g., data seen while printing the header may impact how we print the body). Rather than introduce a new struct to hold modifiable data, let's just drop the const-ness of the existing context struct. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-02commit.c: make compare_commits_by_commit_date globalJeff King
This helper function was introduced as a prio_queue comparator to help topological sorting. However, other users of prio_queue who want to replace commit_list_insert_by_date will want to use it, too. So let's make it public. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-07-01Merge branch 'jc/topo-author-date-sort'Junio C Hamano
"git log" learned the "--author-date-order" option, with which the output is topologically sorted and commits in parallel histories are shown intermixed together based on the author timestamp. * jc/topo-author-date-sort: t6003: add --author-date-order test topology tests: teach a helper to set author dates as well t6003: add --date-order test topology tests: teach a helper to take abbreviated timestamps t/lib-t6000: style fixes log: --author-date-order sort-in-topological-order: use prio-queue prio-queue: priority queue of pointers to structs toposort: rename "lifo" field
2013-07-01Merge branch 'jk/commit-info-slab'Junio C Hamano
Allow adding custom information to commit objects in order to represent unbound number of flag bits etc. * jk/commit-info-slab: commit-slab: introduce a macro to define a slab for new type commit-slab: avoid large realloc commit: allow associating auxiliary info on-demand
2013-06-11log: --author-date-orderJunio C Hamano
Sometimes people would want to view the commits in parallel histories in the order of author dates, not committer dates. Teach "topo-order" sort machinery to do so, using a commit-info slab to record the author dates of each commit, and prio-queue to sort them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-11toposort: rename "lifo" fieldJunio C Hamano
The primary invariant of sort_in_topological_order() is that a parent commit is not emitted until all children of it are. When traversing a forked history like this with "git log C E": A----B----C \ D----E we ensure that A is emitted after all of B, C, D, and E are done, B has to wait until C is done, and D has to wait until E is done. In some applications, however, we would further want to control how these child commits B, C, D and E on two parallel ancestry chains are shown. Most of the time, we would want to see C and B emitted together, and then E and D, and finally A (i.e. the --topo-order output). The "lifo" parameter of the sort_in_topological_order() function is used to control this behaviour. We start the traversal by knowing two commits, C and E. While keeping in mind that we also need to inspect E later, we pick C first to inspect, and we notice and record that B needs to be inspected. By structuring the "work to be done" set as a LIFO stack, we ensure that B is inspected next, before other in-flight commits we had known that we will need to inspect, e.g. E. When showing in --date-order, we would want to see commits ordered by timestamps, i.e. show C, E, B and D in this order before showing A, possibly mixing commits from two parallel histories together. When "lifo" parameter is set to false, the function keeps the "work to be done" set sorted in the date order to realize this semantics. After inspecting C, we add B to the "work to be done" set, but the next commit we inspect from the set is E which is newer than B. The name "lifo", however, is too strongly tied to the way how the function implements its behaviour, and does not describe what the behaviour _means_. Replace this field with an enum rev_sort_order, with two possible values: REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER and REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE, and update the existing code. The mechanical replacement rule is: "lifo == 0" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_BY_COMMIT_DATE" "lifo == 1" is equivalent to "sort_order == REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER" Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-28fetch-pack: prepare updated shallow file before fetching the packNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
index-pack --strict looks up and follows parent commits. If shallow information is not ready by the time index-pack is run, index-pack may be led to non-existent objects. Make fetch-pack save shallow file to disk before invoking index-pack. git learns new global option --shallow-file to pass on the alternate shallow file path. Undocumented (and not even support --shallow-file= syntax) because it's unlikely to be used again elsewhere. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-18pretty: save commit encoding from logmsg_reencode if the caller needs itNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
The commit encoding is parsed by logmsg_reencode, there's no need for the caller to re-parse it again. The reencoded message now has the new encoding, not the original one. The caller would need to read commit object again before parsing. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-14commit: allow associating auxiliary info on-demandJeff King
The "indegree" field in the commit object is only used while sorting a list of commits in topological order, and wasting memory otherwise. We would prefer to shrink the size of individual commit objects, which we may have to hold thousands of in-core. We could eject "indegree" field out from the commit object and represent it as a dynamic table based on the decoration infrastructure, but the decoration is meant for sparse annotation and is not a good match. Instead, let's try a different approach. - Assign an integer (commit->index) to each commit we keep in-core (reuse the space of "indegree" field for it); - When running the topological sort, allocate an array of integers in bulk (called "slab"), use the commit->index as an index into this array, and store the "indegree" information there. This does _not_ reduce the memory footprint of a commit object, but the commit->index can be used as the index to dynamically associate commits with other kinds of information as needed. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-12Sync with 'maint'Junio C Hamano
* maint: Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and tests kwset: fix spelling in comments precompose-utf8: fix spelling of "want" in error message compat/nedmalloc: fix spelling in comments compat/regex: fix spelling and grammar in comments obstack: fix spelling of similar contrib/subtree: fix spelling of accidentally git-remote-mediawiki: spelling fixes doc: various spelling fixes fast-export: fix argument name in error messages Documentation: distinguish between ref and offset deltas in pack-format i18n: make the translation of -u advice in one go
2013-04-12Correct common spelling mistakes in comments and testsStefano Lattarini
Most of these were found using Lucas De Marchi's codespell tool. Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01merge/pull Check for untrusted good GPG signaturesSebastian Götte
When --verify-signatures is specified, abort the merge in case a good GPG signature from an untrusted key is encountered. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Götte <jaseg@physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-01Move commit GPG signature verification to commit.cSebastian Götte
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Götte <jaseg@physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-25Merge branch 'jc/push-follow-tag'Junio C Hamano
The new "--follow-tags" option tells "git push" to push relevant annotated tags when pushing branches out. * jc/push-follow-tag: push: --follow-tags commit.c: use clear_commit_marks_many() in in_merge_bases_many() commit.c: add in_merge_bases_many() commit.c: add clear_commit_marks_many()
2013-03-05commit.c: add in_merge_bases_many()Junio C Hamano
Similar to in_merge_bases(commit, other) that returns true when commit is an ancestor (i.e. in the merge bases between the two) of the other commit, in_merge_bases_many(commit, n_other, other[]) checks if commit is an ancestor of any of the other[] commits. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-05commit.c: add clear_commit_marks_many()Junio C Hamano
clear_commit_marks(struct commit *, unsigned) only can clear flag bits starting from a single commit; introduce an API to allow feeding an array of commits, so that flag bits can be cleared from commits reachable from any of them with a single traversal. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-04Merge branch 'jk/read-commit-buffer-data-after-free'Junio C Hamano
Clarify the ownership rule for commit->buffer field, which some callers incorrectly accessed without making sure it is populated. * jk/read-commit-buffer-data-after-free: logmsg_reencode: lazily load missing commit buffers logmsg_reencode: never return NULL commit: drop useless xstrdup of commit message
2013-02-01Merge branch 'nd/fetch-depth-is-broken'Junio C Hamano
"git fetch --depth" was broken in at least three ways. The resulting history was deeper than specified by one commit, it was unclear how to wipe the shallowness of the repository with the command, and documentation was misleading. * nd/fetch-depth-is-broken: fetch: elaborate --depth action upload-pack: fix off-by-one depth calculation in shallow clone fetch: add --unshallow for turning shallow repo into complete one
2013-01-26logmsg_reencode: never return NULLJeff King
The logmsg_reencode function will return the reencoded commit buffer, or NULL if reencoding failed or no reencoding was necessary. Since every caller then ends up checking for NULL and just using the commit's original buffer, anyway, we can be a bit more helpful and just return that buffer when we would have returned NULL. Since the resulting string may or may not need to be freed, we introduce a logmsg_free, which checks whether the buffer came from the commit object or not (callers either implemented the same check already, or kept two separate pointers, one to mark the buffer to be used, and one for the to-be-freed string). Pushing this logic into logmsg_* simplifies the callers, and will let future patches lazily load the commit buffer in a single place. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-21Merge branch 'ap/log-mailmap'Junio C Hamano
Teach commands in the "log" family to optionally pay attention to the mailmap. * ap/log-mailmap: log --use-mailmap: optimize for cases without --author/--committer search log: add log.mailmap configuration option log: grep author/committer using mailmap test: add test for --use-mailmap option log: add --use-mailmap option pretty: use mailmap to display username and email mailmap: add mailmap structure to rev_info and pp mailmap: simplify map_user() interface mailmap: remove email copy and length limitation Use split_ident_line to parse author and committer string-list: allow case-insensitive string list
2013-01-11fetch: add --unshallow for turning shallow repo into complete oneNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
The user can do --depth=2147483647 (*) for restoring complete repo now. But it's hard to remember. Any other numbers larger than the longest commit chain in the repository would also do, but some guessing may be involved. Make easy-to-remember --unshallow an alias for --depth=2147483647. Make upload-pack recognize this special number as infinite depth. The effect is essentially the same as before, except that upload-pack is more efficient because it does not have to traverse to the bottom anymore. The chance of a user actually wanting exactly 2147483647 commits depth, not infinite, on a repository with a history that long, is probably too small to consider. The client can learn to add or subtract one commit to avoid the special treatment when that actually happens. (*) This is the largest positive number a 32-bit signed integer can contain. JGit and older C Git store depth as "int" so both are OK with this number. Dulwich does not support shallow clone. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-10mailmap: add mailmap structure to rev_info and ppAntoine Pelisse
Pass a mailmap from rev_info to pretty_print_context to so that the pretty printer can use rewritten name and email address when showing commits. Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-01-06Merge branch 'jc/format-color-auto'Junio C Hamano
Introduce "log --format=%C(auto,blue)Foo%C(auto,reset)" that does not color its output when writing to a non-terminal. * jc/format-color-auto: log --format: teach %C(auto,black) to respect color config t6006: clean up whitespace
2012-12-18log --format: teach %C(auto,black) to respect color configJunio C Hamano
Traditionally, %C(color attr) always emitted the ANSI color sequence; it was up to the scripts that wanted to conditionally color their output to omit %C(...) specifier when they do not want colors. Optionally allow "auto," to be prefixed to the color, so that the output is colored iff we would color regular "log" output (e.g., taking into account color.* and --color command line options). Tests and pretty_context bits by Jeff King <peff@peff.net>. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>