summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin/pull.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-12-16pull: display default warning only when non-ffFelipe Contreras
There's no need to display the annoying warning on every pull... only the ones that are not fast-forward. The current warning tests still pass, but not because of the arguments or the configuration, but because they are all fast-forward. We need to test non-fast-forward situations now. Suggestions-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-16pull: correct condition to trigger non-ff adviceJunio C Hamano
Refactor the advise() call that teaches users how they can choose between merge and rebase into a helper function. This revealed that the caller's logic needs to be further clarified to allow future actions (like "erroring out" instead of the current "go ahead and merge anyway") that should happen whether the advice message is squelched out. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-16pull: get rid of unnecessary global variableJunio C Hamano
It is easy enough to do, and gives a more descriptive name to the variable that is scoped in a more focused way. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-14pull: give the advice for choosing rebase/merge much laterFelipe Contreras
Eventually we want to be omit the advice when we can fast-forward in which case there is no reason to require the user to choose between rebase or merge. In order to do so, we need to delay giving the advice up to the point where we can check if we can fast-forward or not. Additionally, config_get_rebase() was probably never its true home. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-14pull: refactor fast-forward checkFelipe Contreras
We would like to be able to make this check before the decision to rebase is made in a future step. Besides, using a separate helper makes the code easier to follow. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-03Merge branch 'pb/pull-rebase-recurse-submodules'Junio C Hamano
"git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules" checked for local changes in a wrong range and failed to run correctly when it should. * pb/pull-rebase-recurse-submodules: pull: check for local submodule modifications with the right range t5572: describe '--rebase' tests a little more t5572: add notes on a peculiar test pull --rebase: compute rebase arguments in separate function
2020-11-30Merge branch 'js/pull-rebase-use-advise'Junio C Hamano
UI improvement. * js/pull-rebase-use-advise: pull: colorize the hint about setting `pull.rebase`
2020-11-19pull: colorize the hint about setting `pull.rebase`Johannes Schindelin
In d18c950a69f (pull: warn if the user didn't say whether to rebase or to merge, 2020-03-09), a new hint was introduced to encourage users to make a conscious decision about whether they want their pull to merge or to rebase by configuring the `pull.rebase` setting. This warning was clearly intended to advise users, but as pointed out in https://lore.kernel.org/git/87ima2rdsm.fsf%40evledraar.gmail.com, it uses `warning()` instead of `advise()`. One consequence is that the advice is not colorized in the same manner as other, similar messages. So let's use `advise()` instead. Pointed-out-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-17pull: check for local submodule modifications with the right rangePhilippe Blain
Ever since 'git pull' learned '--recurse-submodules' in a6d7eb2c7a (pull: optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only), 2017-06-23), we check if there are local submodule modifications by checking the revision range 'curr_head --not rebase_fork_point'. The goal of this check is to abort the pull if there are submodule modifications in the local commits being rebased, since this scenario is not supported. However, the actual range of commits being rebased is not 'rebase_fork_point..curr_head', as the logic in 'get_rebase_newbase_and_upstream' reveals, it is 'upstream..curr_head'. If the 'git merge-base --fork-point' invocation in 'get_rebase_fork_point' fails to find a fork point between the current branch and the remote-tracking branch we are pulling from, 'rebase_fork_point' is null and since 4d36f88be7 (submodule: do not pass null OID to setup_revisions, 2018-05-24), 'submodule_touches_in_range' checks 'curr_head' and all its ancestors for submodule modifications. Since it is highly likely that there are submodule modifications in this range (which is in effect the whole history of the current branch), this prevents 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules' from succeeding if no fork point exists between the current branch and the remote-tracking branch being pulled. This can happen, for example, when the current branch was forked from a commit which was never recorded in the reflog of the remote-tracking branch we are pulling, as the last two paragraphs of the "Discussion on fork-point mode" section in git-merge-base(1) explain. Fix this bug by passing 'upstream' instead of 'rebase_fork_point' as the 'excl_oid' argument to 'submodule_touches_in_range'. Reported-by: Brice Goglin <bgoglin@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-17pull --rebase: compute rebase arguments in separate functionPhilippe Blain
The function 'run_rebase' is responsible for constructing the command line to be passed to 'git rebase'. This includes both forwarding pass-through options given to 'git pull' as well computing the <newbase> and <upstream> arguments to 'git rebase'. A following commit will need to access the <upstream> argument in 'cmd_pull' to fix a bug with 'git pull --rebase --recurse-submodules'. In order to do so, refactor the code so that the <newbase> and <upstream> commits are computed in a new, separate function, 'get_rebase_newbase_and_upstream'. Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-10-20Documentation: stylistically normalize references to Signed-off-by:Bradley M. Kuhn
Ted reported an old typo in the git-commit.txt and merge-options.txt. Namely, the phrase "Signed-off-by line" was used without either a definite nor indefinite article. Upon examination, it seems that the documentation (including items in Documentation/, but also option help strings) have been quite inconsistent on usage when referring to `Signed-off-by`. First, very few places used a definite or indefinite article with the phrase "Signed-off-by line", but that was the initial typo that led to this investigation. So, normalize using either an indefinite or definite article consistently. The original phrasing, in Commit 3f971fc425b (Documentation updates, 2005-08-14), is "Add Signed-off-by line". Commit 6f855371a53 (Add --signoff, --check, and long option-names. 2005-12-09) switched to using "Add `Signed-off-by:` line", but didn't normalize the former commit to match. Later commits seem to have cut and pasted from one or the other, which is likely how the usage became so inconsistent. Junio stated on the git mailing list in <xmqqy2k1dfoh.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com> a preference to leave off the colon. Thus, prefer `Signed-off-by` (with backticks) for the documentation files and Signed-off-by (without backticks) for option help strings. Additionally, Junio argued that "trailer" is now the standard term to refer to `Signed-off-by`, saying that "becomes plenty clear that we are not talking about any random line in the log message". As such, prefer "trailer" over "line" anywhere the former word fits. However, leave alone those few places in documentation that use Signed-off-by to refer to the process (rather than the specific trailer), or in places where mail headers are generally discussed in comparison with Signed-off-by. Reported-by: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@sfconservancy.org> Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-09-29Merge branch 'ah/pull'Junio C Hamano
Earlier we taught "git pull" to warn when the user does not say the histories need to be merged, rebased or accepts only fast- forwarding, but the warning triggered for those who have set the pull.ff configuration variable. * ah/pull: pull: don't warn if pull.ff has been set
2020-09-25pull: don't warn if pull.ff has been setAlex Henrie
A user who understands enough to set pull.ff does not need additional instructions. Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-31strvec: rename struct fieldsJeff King
The "argc" and "argv" names made sense when the struct was argv_array, but now they're just confusing. Let's rename them to "nr" (which we use for counts elsewhere) and "v" (which is rather terse, but reads well when combined with typical variable names like "args.v"). Note that we have to update all of the callers immediately. Playing tricks with the preprocessor is hard here, because we wouldn't want to rewrite unrelated tokens. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-28strvec: fix indentation in renamed callsJeff King
Code which split an argv_array call across multiple lines, like: argv_array_pushl(&args, "one argument", "another argument", "and more", NULL); was recently mechanically renamed to use strvec, which results in mis-matched indentation like: strvec_pushl(&args, "one argument", "another argument", "and more", NULL); Let's fix these up to align the arguments with the opening paren. I did this manually by sifting through the results of: git jump grep 'strvec_.*,$' and liberally applying my editor's auto-format. Most of the changes are of the form shown above, though I also normalized a few that had originally used a single-tab indentation (rather than our usual style of aligning with the open paren). I also rewrapped a couple of obvious cases (e.g., where previously too-long lines became short enough to fit on one), but I wasn't aggressive about it. In cases broken to three or more lines, the grouping of arguments is sometimes meaningful, and it wasn't worth my time or reviewer time to ponder each case individually. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-28strvec: convert builtin/ callers away from argv_array nameJeff King
We eventually want to drop the argv_array name and just use strvec consistently. There's no particular reason we have to do it all at once, or care about interactions between converted and unconverted bits. Because of our preprocessor compat layer, the names are interchangeable to the compiler (so even a definition and declaration using different names is OK). This patch converts all of the files in builtin/ to keep the diff to a manageable size. The conversion was done purely mechanically with: git ls-files '*.c' '*.h' | xargs perl -i -pe ' s/ARGV_ARRAY/STRVEC/g; s/argv_array/strvec/g; ' and then selectively staging files with "git add builtin/". We'll deal with any indentation/style fallouts separately. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-07-07Merge branch 'cb/is-descendant-of'Junio C Hamano
Code clean-up. * cb/is-descendant-of: commit-reach: avoid is_descendant_of() shim
2020-06-29Merge branch 'rs/pull-leakfix'Junio C Hamano
Leakfix. * rs/pull-leakfix: pull: plug minor memory leak after using is_descendant_of()
2020-06-23commit-reach: avoid is_descendant_of() shimCarlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
d91d6fbf26 (commit-reach: create repo_is_descendant_of(), 2020-06-17) adds a repository aware version of is_descendant_of() and a backward compatibility shim that is barely used. Update all callers to directly use the new repo_is_descendant_of() function instead; making the codebase simpler and pushing more the_repository references higher up the stack. Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-19pull: plug minor memory leak after using is_descendant_of()René Scharfe
cmd_pull() builds a commit_list to pass a single potential ancestor to is_descendant_of(). The latter leaves the list intact. Release the allocated memory after the call. Leaking in cmd_*() isn't a big deal, but sets a bad example for other users of is_descendant_of(). Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-05Merge branch 'dl/opt-callback-cleanup'Junio C Hamano
Code cleanup. * dl/opt-callback-cleanup: Use OPT_CALLBACK and OPT_CALLBACK_F
2020-04-29Merge branch 'dl/merge-autostash'Junio C Hamano
"git merge" learns the "--autostash" option. * dl/merge-autostash: (22 commits) pull: pass --autostash to merge t5520: make test_pull_autostash() accept expect_parent_num merge: teach --autostash option sequencer: implement apply_autostash_oid() sequencer: implement save_autostash() sequencer: unlink autostash in apply_autostash() sequencer: extract perform_autostash() from rebase rebase: generify create_autostash() rebase: extract create_autostash() reset: extract reset_head() from rebase rebase: generify reset_head() rebase: use apply_autostash() from sequencer.c sequencer: rename stash_sha1 to stash_oid sequencer: make apply_autostash() accept a path rebase: use read_oneliner() sequencer: make read_oneliner() extern sequencer: configurably warn on non-existent files sequencer: make read_oneliner() accept flags sequencer: make file exists check more efficient sequencer: stop leaking buf ...
2020-04-28Use OPT_CALLBACK and OPT_CALLBACK_FDenton Liu
In the codebase, there are many options which use OPTION_CALLBACK in a plain ol' struct definition. However, we have the OPT_CALLBACK and OPT_CALLBACK_F macros which are meant to abstract these plain struct definitions away. These macros are useful as they semantically signal to developers that these are just normal callback option with nothing fancy happening. Replace plain struct definitions of OPTION_CALLBACK with OPT_CALLBACK or OPT_CALLBACK_F where applicable. The heavy lifting was done using the following (disgusting) shell script: #!/bin/sh do_replacement () { tr '\n' '\r' | sed -e 's/{\s*OPTION_CALLBACK,\s*\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\s*0,\(\s*[^[:space:]}]*\)\s*}/OPT_CALLBACK(\1,\2,\3,\4,\5,\6)/g' | sed -e 's/{\s*OPTION_CALLBACK,\s*\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\([^,]*\),\(\s*[^[:space:]}]*\)\s*}/OPT_CALLBACK_F(\1,\2,\3,\4,\5,\6,\7)/g' | tr '\r' '\n' } for f in $(git ls-files \*.c) do do_replacement <"$f" >"$f.tmp" mv "$f.tmp" "$f" done The result was manually inspected and then reformatted to match the style of the surrounding code. Finally, using `git grep OPTION_CALLBACK \*.c`, leftover results which were not handled by the script were manually transformed. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-04-22Merge branch 'jk/oid-array-cleanups'Junio C Hamano
Code cleanup. * jk/oid-array-cleanups: oidset: stop referring to sha1-array ref-filter: stop referring to "sha1 array" bisect: stop referring to sha1_array test-tool: rename sha1-array to oid-array oid_array: rename source file from sha1-array oid_array: use size_t for iteration oid_array: use size_t for count and allocation
2020-04-22Merge branch 'en/pull-do-not-rebase-after-fast-forwarding'Junio C Hamano
"git pull --rebase" tried to run a rebase even after noticing that the pull results in a fast-forward and no rebase is needed nor sensible, for the past few years due to a mistake nobody noticed. * en/pull-do-not-rebase-after-fast-forwarding: pull: avoid running both merge and rebase
2020-04-22Merge branch 'rs/pull-options-sync-code-and-doc'Junio C Hamano
"git pull" shares many options with underlying "git fetch", but some of them were not documented and some of those that would make sense to pass down were not passed down. * rs/pull-options-sync-code-and-doc: pull: pass documented fetch options on pull: remove --update-head-ok from documentation
2020-04-10pull: pass --autostash to mergeDenton Liu
Before, `--autostash` only worked with `git pull --rebase`. However, in the last patch, merge learned `--autostash` as well so there's no reason why we should have this restriction anymore. Teach pull to pass `--autostash` to merge, just like it did for rebase. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-30oid_array: rename source file from sha1-arrayJeff King
We renamed the actual data structure in 910650d2f8 (Rename sha1_array to oid_array, 2017-03-31), but the file is still called sha1-array. Besides being slightly confusing, it makes it more annoying to grep for leftover occurrences of "sha1" in various files, because the header is included in so many places. Let's complete the transition by renaming the source and header files (and fixing up a few comment references). I kept the "-" in the name, as that seems to be our style; cf. fc1395f4a4 (sha1_file.c: rename to use dash in file name, 2018-04-10). We also have oidmap.h and oidset.h without any punctuation, but those are "struct oidmap" and "struct oidset" in the code. We _could_ make this "oidarray" to match, but somehow it looks uglier to me because of the length of "array" (plus it would be a very invasive patch for little gain). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-29pull: pass documented fetch options onRené Scharfe
The fetch options --deepen, --negotiation-tip, --server-option, --shallow-exclude, and --shallow-since are documented for git pull as well, but are not actually accepted by that command. Pass them on to make the code match its documentation. Reported-by: 天几 <muzimuzhi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-27pull: avoid running both merge and rebaseElijah Newren
When opt_rebase is true, we still first check if we can fast-forward. If the branch is fast-forwardable, then we can avoid the rebase and just use merge to do the fast-forward logic. However, when commit a6d7eb2c7a ("pull: optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only)", 2017-06-23) added the ability to rebase submodules it accidentally caused us to run BOTH a merge and a rebase. Add a flag to avoid doing both. This was found when a user had both pull.rebase and rebase.autosquash set to true. In such a case, the running of both merge and rebase would cause ORIG_HEAD to be updated twice (and match HEAD at the end instead of the commit before the rebase started), against expectation. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-10pull: warn if the user didn't say whether to rebase or to mergeAlex Henrie
Often novice Git users forget to say "pull --rebase" and end up with an unnecessary merge from upstream. What they usually want is either "pull --rebase" in the simpler cases, or "pull --ff-only" to update the copy of main integration branches, and rebase their work separately. The pull.rebase configuration variable exists to help them in the simpler cases, but there is no mechanism to make these users aware of it. Issue a warning message when no --[no-]rebase option from the command line and no pull.rebase configuration variable is given. This will inconvenience those who never want to "pull --rebase", who haven't had to do anything special, but the cost of the inconvenience is paid only once per user, which should be a reasonable cost to help a number of new users. Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-25Merge branch 'bw/remote-rename-update-config'Junio C Hamano
"git remote rename X Y" needs to adjust configuration variables (e.g. branch.<name>.remote) whose value used to be X to Y. branch.<name>.pushRemote is now also updated. * bw/remote-rename-update-config: remote rename/remove: gently handle remote.pushDefault config config: provide access to the current line number remote rename/remove: handle branch.<name>.pushRemote config values remote: clean-up config callback remote: clean-up by returning early to avoid one indentation pull --rebase/remote rename: document and honor single-letter abbreviations rebase types
2020-02-10pull --rebase/remote rename: document and honor single-letter abbreviations ↵Bert Wesarg
rebase types When 46af44b07d (pull --rebase=<type>: allow single-letter abbreviations for the type, 2018-08-04) landed in Git, it had the side effect that not only 'pull --rebase=<type>' accepted the single-letter abbreviations but also the 'pull.rebase' and 'branch.<name>.rebase' configurations. However, 'git remote rename' did not honor these single-letter abbreviations when reading the 'branch.*.rebase' configurations. We now document the single-letter abbreviations and both code places share a common function to parse the values of 'git pull --rebase=*', 'pull.rebase', and 'branches.*.rebase'. The only functional change is the handling of the `branch_info::rebase` value. Before it was an unsigned enum, thus the truth value could be checked with `branch_info::rebase != 0`. But `enum rebase_type` is signed, thus the truth value must now be checked with `branch_info::rebase >= REBASE_TRUE` Signed-off-by: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-15gpg-interface: add minTrustLevel as a configuration optionHans Jerry Illikainen
Previously, signature verification for merge and pull operations checked if the key had a trust-level of either TRUST_NEVER or TRUST_UNDEFINED in verify_merge_signature(). If that was the case, the process die()d. The other code paths that did signature verification relied entirely on the return code from check_commit_signature(). And signatures made with a good key, irregardless of its trust level, was considered valid by check_commit_signature(). This difference in behavior might induce users to erroneously assume that the trust level of a key in their keyring is always considered by Git, even for operations where it is not (e.g. during a verify-commit or verify-tag). The way it worked was by gpg-interface.c storing the result from the key/signature status *and* the lowest-two trust levels in the `result` member of the signature_check structure (the last of these status lines that were encountered got written to `result`). These are documented in GPG under the subsection `General status codes` and `Key related`, respectively [1]. The GPG documentation says the following on the TRUST_ status codes [1]: """ These are several similar status codes: - TRUST_UNDEFINED <error_token> - TRUST_NEVER <error_token> - TRUST_MARGINAL [0 [<validation_model>]] - TRUST_FULLY [0 [<validation_model>]] - TRUST_ULTIMATE [0 [<validation_model>]] For good signatures one of these status lines are emitted to indicate the validity of the key used to create the signature. The error token values are currently only emitted by gpgsm. """ My interpretation is that the trust level is conceptionally different from the validity of the key and/or signature. That seems to also have been the assumption of the old code in check_signature() where a result of 'G' (as in GOODSIG) and 'U' (as in TRUST_NEVER or TRUST_UNDEFINED) were both considered a success. The two cases where a result of 'U' had special meaning were in verify_merge_signature() (where this caused git to die()) and in format_commit_one() (where it affected the output of the %G? format specifier). I think it makes sense to refactor the processing of TRUST_ status lines such that users can configure a minimum trust level that is enforced globally, rather than have individual parts of git (e.g. merge) do it themselves (except for a grace period with backward compatibility). I also think it makes sense to not store the trust level in the same struct member as the key/signature status. While the presence of a TRUST_ status code does imply that the signature is good (see the first paragraph in the included snippet above), as far as I can tell, the order of the status lines from GPG isn't well-defined; thus it would seem plausible that the trust level could be overwritten with the key/signature status if they were stored in the same member of the signature_check structure. This patch introduces a new configuration option: gpg.minTrustLevel. It consolidates trust-level verification to gpg-interface.c and adds a new `trust_level` member to the signature_check structure. Backward-compatibility is maintained by introducing a special case in verify_merge_signature() such that if no user-configurable gpg.minTrustLevel is set, then the old behavior of rejecting TRUST_UNDEFINED and TRUST_NEVER is enforced. If, on the other hand, gpg.minTrustLevel is set, then that value overrides the old behavior. Similarly, the %G? format specifier will continue show 'U' for signatures made with a key that has a trust level of TRUST_UNDEFINED or TRUST_NEVER, even though the 'U' character no longer exist in the `result` member of the signature_check structure. A new format specifier, %GT, is also introduced for users that want to show all possible trust levels for a signature. Another approach would have been to simply drop the trust-level requirement in verify_merge_signature(). This would also have made the behavior consistent with other parts of git that perform signature verification. However, requiring a minimum trust level for signing keys does seem to have a real-world use-case. For example, the build system used by the Qubes OS project currently parses the raw output from verify-tag in order to assert a minimum trust level for keys used to sign git tags [2]. [1] https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg.git;a=blob;f=doc/doc/DETAILS;h=bd00006e933ac56719b1edd2478ecd79273eae72;hb=refs/heads/master [2] https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-builder/blob/9674c1991deef45b1a1b1c71fddfab14ba50dccf/scripts/verify-git-tag#L43 Signed-off-by: Hans Jerry Illikainen <hji@dyntopia.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-08-19pull, fetch: add --set-upstream optionCorentin BOMPARD
Add the --set-upstream option to git pull/fetch which lets the user set the upstream configuration (branch.<current-branch-name>.merge and branch.<current-branch-name>.remote) for the current branch. A typical use-case is: git clone http://example.com/my-public-fork git remote add main http://example.com/project-main-repo git pull --set-upstream main master or, instead of the last line: git fetch --set-upstream main master git merge # or git rebase This is mostly equivalent to cloning project-main-repo (which sets upsteam) and then "git remote add" my-public-fork, but may feel more natural for people using a hosting system which allows forking from the web UI. This functionality is analog to "git push --set-upstream". Signed-off-by: Corentin BOMPARD <corentin.bompard@etu.univ-lyon1.fr> Signed-off-by: Nathan BERBEZIER <nathan.berbezier@etu.univ-lyon1.fr> Signed-off-by: Pablo CHABANNE <pablo.chabanne@etu.univ-lyon1.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <git@matthieu-moy.fr> Patch-edited-by: Matthieu Moy <git@matthieu-moy.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-21pull: add --[no-]show-forced-updates passthroughDerrick Stolee
The 'git fetch' command can avoid calculating forced updates, so allow users of 'git pull' to provide that option. This is particularly necessary when the advice to use '--no-show-forced-updates' is given at the end of the command. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-08Merge branch 'dl/merge-cleanup-scissors-fix'Junio C Hamano
The list of conflicted paths shown in the editor while concluding a conflicted merge was shown above the scissors line when the clean-up mode is set to "scissors", even though it was commented out just like the list of updated paths and other information to help the user explain the merge better. * dl/merge-cleanup-scissors-fix: cherry-pick/revert: add scissors line on merge conflict sequencer.c: save and restore cleanup mode merge: add scissors line on merge conflict merge: cleanup messages like commit parse-options.h: extract common --cleanup option commit: extract cleanup_mode functions to sequencer t7502: clean up style t7604: clean up style t3507: clean up style t7600: clean up style
2019-04-18merge: cleanup messages like commitDenton Liu
This change allows git-merge messages to be cleaned up with the commit.cleanup configuration or --cleanup option, just like how git-commit does it. We also give git-pull the option of --cleanup so that it can also take advantage of this change. Finally, add testing to ensure that messages are properly cleaned up. Note that some newlines that were added to the commit message were removed so that if a file were read via -F, it would be copied faithfully. Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-01builtin/pull: make hash-size independentbrian m. carlson
Instead of using get_oid_hex and GIT_SHA1_HEXSZ, use parse_oid_hex to avoid the need for a constant and simplify the code. Additionally, fix some comments to refer to object IDs instead of SHA-1 and update a constant used to provide an allocation hint. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-02-20completion: add more parameter value completionNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
This adds value completion for a couple more paramters. To make it easier to maintain these hard coded lists, add a comment at the original list/code to remind people to update git-completion.bash too. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-24cache.h: flip NO_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS switchNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
By default, index compat macros are off from now on, because they could hide the_index dependency. Only those in builtin can use it. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-01-04Merge branch 'nd/the-index'Junio C Hamano
More codepaths become aware of working with in-core repository instance other than the default "the_repository". * nd/the-index: (22 commits) rebase-interactive.c: remove the_repository references rerere.c: remove the_repository references pack-*.c: remove the_repository references pack-check.c: remove the_repository references notes-cache.c: remove the_repository references line-log.c: remove the_repository reference diff-lib.c: remove the_repository references delta-islands.c: remove the_repository references cache-tree.c: remove the_repository references bundle.c: remove the_repository references branch.c: remove the_repository reference bisect.c: remove the_repository reference blame.c: remove implicit dependency the_repository sequencer.c: remove implicit dependency on the_repository sequencer.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index transport.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index notes-merge.c: remove implicit dependency the_repository notes-merge.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index list-objects.c: reduce the_repository references list-objects-filter.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index ...
2018-11-18Merge branch 'jk/verify-sig-merge-into-void'Junio C Hamano
"git merge" and "git pull" that merges into an unborn branch used to completely ignore "--verify-signatures", which has been corrected. * jk/verify-sig-merge-into-void: pull: handle --verify-signatures for unborn branch merge: handle --verify-signatures for unborn branch merge: extract verify_merge_signature() helper
2018-11-12wt-status.c: remove implicit dependency on the_indexNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-07pull: handle --verify-signatures for unborn branchJeff King
We usually just forward the --verify-signatures option along to git-merge, and trust it to do the right thing. However, when we are on an unborn branch (i.e., there is no HEAD yet), we handle this case ourselves without even calling git-merge. And in this code path, we do not respect the verification option at all. It may be more maintainable in the long run to call git-merge for the unborn case. That would fix this bug, as well as prevent similar ones in the future. But unfortunately it's not easy to do. As t5520.3 demonstrates, there are some special cases that git-merge does not handle, like "git pull .. master:master" (by the time git-merge is invoked, we've overwritten the unborn HEAD). So for now let's just teach git-pull to handle this feature. Reported-by: Felix Eckhofer <felix@eckhofer.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-22submodule.c: remove some of the_repository referencesNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Commit 174d131fc9 (submodule.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index - 2018-09-21) makes collect_changed_submodules() take a "struct index_state *" as argument even if it's not really used. My bad. Instead of deleting this argument and fixing up all call sites. Let's take this opportunity to remove some the_repository instead because there's one or two in this function (and two more in its callback). The callers can also get rid of some the_repository. Noticed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-19Merge branch 'nd/the-index'Junio C Hamano
Various codepaths in the core-ish part learn to work on an arbitrary in-core index structure, not necessarily the default instance "the_index". * nd/the-index: (23 commits) revision.c: reduce implicit dependency the_repository revision.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index ws.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index tree-diff.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index submodule.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index line-range.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index userdiff.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index rerere.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index sha1-file.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index patch-ids.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index merge.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index merge-blobs.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index ll-merge.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index diff-lib.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index read-cache.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index diff.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index grep.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index diff.c: remove the_index dependency in textconv() functions blame.c: rename "repo" argument to "r" combine-diff.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index ...
2018-09-21submodule.c: remove implicit dependency on the_indexNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-21merge.c: remove implicit dependency on the_indexNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-17Merge branch 'jk/cocci'Junio C Hamano
spatch transformation to replace boolean uses of !hashcmp() to newly introduced oideq() is added, and applied, to regain performance lost due to support of multiple hash algorithms. * jk/cocci: show_dirstat: simplify same-content check read-cache: use oideq() in ce_compare functions convert hashmap comparison functions to oideq() convert "hashcmp() != 0" to "!hasheq()" convert "oidcmp() != 0" to "!oideq()" convert "hashcmp() == 0" to hasheq() convert "oidcmp() == 0" to oideq() introduce hasheq() and oideq() coccinelle: use <...> for function exclusion