summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/branch.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-07-09Merge branch 'nd/switch-and-restore'Junio C Hamano
Two new commands "git switch" and "git restore" are introduced to split "checking out a branch to work on advancing its history" and "checking out paths out of the index and/or a tree-ish to work on advancing the current history" out of the single "git checkout" command. * nd/switch-and-restore: (46 commits) completion: disable dwim on "git switch -d" switch: allow to switch in the middle of bisect t2027: use test_must_be_empty Declare both git-switch and git-restore experimental help: move git-diff and git-reset to different groups doc: promote "git restore" user-manual.txt: prefer 'merge --abort' over 'reset --hard' completion: support restore t: add tests for restore restore: support --patch restore: replace --force with --ignore-unmerged restore: default to --source=HEAD when only --staged is specified restore: reject invalid combinations with --staged restore: add --worktree and --staged checkout: factor out worktree checkout code restore: disable overlay mode by default restore: make pathspec mandatory restore: take tree-ish from --source option instead checkout: split part of it to new command 'restore' doc: promote "git switch" ...
2019-06-13Merge branch 'nd/merge-quit'Junio C Hamano
"git merge" learned "--quit" option that cleans up the in-progress merge while leaving the working tree and the index still in a mess. * nd/merge-quit: merge: add --quit merge: remove drop_save() in favor of remove_merge_branch_state()
2019-05-13merge: remove drop_save() in favor of remove_merge_branch_state()Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Both remove_branch_state() and drop_save() delete almost the same set of files about the current merge state. The only difference is MERGE_RR but it should also be cleaned up after a successful merge, which is what drop_save() is for. Make a new function that deletes all merge-related state files and use it instead of drop_save(). This function will also be used in the next patch that introduces --quit. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-05*.[ch]: manually align parameter listsDenton Liu
In previous patches, extern was mechanically removed from function declarations without care to formatting, causing parameter lists to be misaligned. Manually format changed sections such that the parameter lists should be realigned. Viewing this patch with 'git diff -w' should produce no output. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-05*.[ch]: remove extern from function declarations using spatchDenton Liu
There has been a push to remove extern from function declarations. Remove some instances of "extern" for function declarations which are caught by Coccinelle. Note that Coccinelle has some difficulty with processing functions with `__attribute__` or varargs so some `extern` declarations are left behind to be dealt with in a future patch. This was the Coccinelle patch used: @@ type T; identifier f; @@ - extern T f(...); and it was run with: $ git ls-files \*.{c,h} | grep -v ^compat/ | xargs spatch --sp-file contrib/coccinelle/noextern.cocci --in-place Files under `compat/` are intentionally excluded as some are directly copied from external sources and we should avoid churning them as much as possible. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-04-02checkout: inform the user when removing branch stateNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
After a successful switch, if a merge, cherry-pick or revert is ongoing, it is canceled. This behavior has been with us from the very early beginning, soon after git-merge was created but never actually documented [1]. It may be a good idea to be transparent and tell the user if some operation is canceled. I consider this a better way of telling the user than just adding a sentence or two in git-checkout.txt, which will be mostly ignored anyway. PS. Originally I wanted to print more details like warning: cancelling an in-progress merge from <SHA-1> which may allow some level of undo if the user wants to. But that seems a lot more work. Perhaps it can be improved later if people still want that. [1] ... and I will try not to argue whether it is a sensible behavior. There is some more discussion here if people are interested: CACsJy8Axa5WsLSjiscjnxVK6jQHkfs-gH959=YtUvQkWriAk5w@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-12branch.c: remove the_repository referenceNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-15Move definition of enum branch_track from cache.h to branch.hElijah Newren
'branch_track' feels more closely related to branching, and it is needed later in branch.h; rather than #include'ing cache.h in branch.h for this small enum, just move the enum and the external declaration for git_branch_track to branch.h. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-15Add missing includes and forward declarationsElijah Newren
I looped over the toplevel header files, creating a temporary two-line C program for each consisting of #include "git-compat-util.h" #include $HEADER This patch is the result of manually fixing errors in compiling those tiny programs. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-27Merge branch 'ks/branch-cleanup'Junio C Hamano
Code clean-up. * ks/branch-cleanup: builtin/branch: strip refs/heads/ using skip_prefix branch: update warning message shown when copying a misnamed branch branch: group related arguments of create_branch() branch: improve documentation and naming of create_branch() parameters
2017-12-07branch: group related arguments of create_branch()Kaartic Sivaraam
39bd6f726 (Allow checkout -B <current-branch> to update the current branch, 2011-11-26) added 'clobber_head' (now, 'clobber_head_ok') "before" 'track' as 'track' was closely related 'clobber_head' for the purpose the commit wanted to achieve. Looking from the perspective of how the arguments are used it turns out that 'clobber_head' is more related to 'force' than it is to 'track'. So, re-order the arguments to keep the related arguments close to each other. Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-12-07branch: improve documentation and naming of create_branch() parametersKaartic Sivaraam
The documentation for 'create_branch()' was incomplete as it didn't say what certain parameters were used for. Further a parameter name wasn't very communicative. So, add missing documentation for the sake of completeness and easy reference. Also, rename the concerned parameter to make its name more communicative. Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-10-13branch: split validate_new_branchname() into twoJunio C Hamano
Checking if a proposed name is appropriate for a branch is strictly a subset of checking if we want to allow creating or updating a branch with such a name. The mysterious sounding 'attr_only' parameter to validate_new_branchname() is used to switch the function between these two roles. Instead, split the function into two, and adjust the callers. A new helper validate_branchname() only checks the name and reports if the branch already exists. This loses one NEEDSWORK from the branch API. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-02-21branch: record creation of renamed branch in HEAD's logKyle Meyer
Renaming the current branch adds an event to the current branch's log and to HEAD's log. However, the logged entries differ. The entry in the branch's log represents the entire renaming operation (the old and new hash are identical), whereas the entry in HEAD's log represents the deletion only (the new sha1 is null). Extend replace_each_worktree_head_symref(), whose only caller is branch_rename(), to take a reflog message argument. This allows the creation of the new ref to be recorded in HEAD's log. As a result, the renaming event is represented by two entries (a deletion and a creation entry) in HEAD's log. It's a bit unfortunate that the branch's log and HEAD's log now represent the renaming event in different ways. Given that the renaming operation is not atomic, the two-entry form is a more accurate representation of the operation and is more useful for debugging purposes if a failure occurs between the deletion and creation events. It would make sense to move the branch's log to the two-entry form, but this would involve changes to how the rename is carried out and to how the update flags and reflogs are processed for deletions, so it may not be worth the effort. Based-on-patch-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-11-09create_branch: drop unused "head" parameterJeff King
This function used to have the caller pass in the current value of HEAD, in order to make sure we didn't clobber HEAD. In 55c4a6730, that logic moved to validate_new_branchname(), which just resolves HEAD itself. The parameter to create_branch is now unused. Since we have to update and re-wrap the docstring describing the parameters anyway, let's take this opportunity to break it out into a list, which makes it easier to find the parameters. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-22worktree.c: check whether branch is rebased in another worktreeNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
This function find_shared_symref() is used in a couple places: 1) in builtin/branch.c: it's used to detect if a branch is checked out elsewhere and refuse to delete the branch. 2) in builtin/notes.c: it's used to detect if a note is being merged in another worktree 3) in branch.c, the function die_if_checked_out() is actually used by "git checkout" and "git worktree add" to see if a branch is already checked out elsewhere and refuse the operation. In cases 1 and 3, if a rebase is ongoing, "HEAD" will be in detached mode, find_shared_symref() fails to detect it and declares "no branch is checked out here", which is not really what we want. This patch tightens the test. If the given symref is "HEAD", we try to detect if rebase is ongoing. If so return the branch being rebased. This makes checkout and branch delete operations safer because you can't checkout a branch being rebased in another place, or delete it. Special case for checkout. If the current branch is being rebased, git-rebase.sh may use "git checkout" to abort and return back to the original branch. The updated test in find_shared_symref() will prevent that and "git rebase --abort" will fail as a result. find_shared_symref() and die_if_checked_out() have to learn a new option ignore_current_worktree to loosen the test a bit. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-04-04branch -m: update all per-worktree HEADsKazuki Yamaguchi
When renaming a branch, currently only the HEAD of current working tree is updated, but it must update HEADs of all working trees which point at the old branch. This is the current behavior, /path/to/wt's HEAD is not updated: % git worktree list /path/to 2c3c5f2 [master] /path/to/wt 2c3c5f2 [oldname] % git branch -m master master2 % git worktree list /path/to 2c3c5f2 [master2] /path/to/wt 2c3c5f2 [oldname] % git branch -m oldname newname % git worktree list /path/to 2c3c5f2 [master2] /path/to/wt 0000000 [oldname] This patch fixes this issue by updating all relevant worktree HEADs when renaming a branch. Signed-off-by: Kazuki Yamaguchi <k@rhe.jp> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-22branch: report errors in tracking branch setupPatrick Steinhardt
When setting up a new tracking branch fails due to issues with the configuration file we do not report any errors to the user and pretend setting the tracking branch succeeded. Setting up the tracking branch is handled by the `install_branch_config` function. We do not want to simply die there as the function is not only invoked when explicitly setting upstream information with `git branch --set-upstream-to=`, but also by `git push --set-upstream` and `git clone`. While it is reasonable to die in the explict first case, we would lose information in the latter two cases, so we only print the error message but continue the program as usual. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-10-02worktree: add top-level worktree.cMichael Rappazzo
worktree.c contains functions to work with and get information from worktrees. This introduction moves functions related to worktrees from branch.c into worktree.c Signed-off-by: Michael Rappazzo <rappazzo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-08-11worktrees: add find_shared_symrefDavid Turner
Add a new function, find_shared_symref, which contains the heart of die_if_checked_out, but works for any symref, not just HEAD. Refactor die_if_checked_out to use the same infrastructure as find_shared_symref. Soon, we will use find_shared_symref to protect notes merges in worktrees. Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> Reviewed-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-20branch: publish die_if_checked_out()Eric Sunshine
git-worktree currently conflates new branch creation, setting of HEAD in the new wortkree, and worktree population into a single sub-invocation of git-checkout. However, these operations will eventually be separated, and git-worktree itself will need to be able to detect if the branch is already checked out elsewhere, rather than relying upon git-branch to make this determination, so publish die_if_checked_out(). Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-03-27checkout: suppress tracking message with "-q"Jeff King
Like the "switched to..." message (which is already suppressed by "-q"), this message is purely informational. Let's silence it if the user asked us to be quiet. This patch is slightly more than a one-liner, because we have to teach create_branch to propagate the flag all the way down to install_branch_config. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-14Merge branch 'jn/branch-move-to-self'Junio C Hamano
* jn/branch-move-to-self: Allow checkout -B <current-branch> to update the current branch branch: allow a no-op "branch -M <current-branch> HEAD"
2011-11-28Allow checkout -B <current-branch> to update the current branchJonathan Nieder
When on master, "git checkout -B master <commit>" is a more natural way to say "git reset --keep <commit>", which was originally invented for the exact purpose of moving to the named commit while keeping the local changes around. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-10-05branch: add read_branch_desc() helper functionJunio C Hamano
This will be used by various callers that make use of the branch description throughout the system, so that if we need to update the implementation the callers do not have to be modified. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-17branch --set-upstream: regression fixJunio C Hamano
The "git branch" command, while not in listing mode, calls create_branch() even when the target branch already exists, and it does so even when it is not interested in updating the value of the branch (i.e. the name of the commit object that sits at the tip of the existing branch). This happens when the command is run with "--set-upstream" option. The earlier safety-measure to prevent "git branch -f $branch $commit" from updating the currently checked out branch did not take it into account, and we no longer can update the tracking information of the current branch. Minimally fix this regression by telling the validation code if it is called to really update the value of a potentially existing branch, or if the caller merely is interested in updating auxiliary aspects of a branch. Reported-and-Tested-by: Jay Soffian Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-22Prevent force-updating of the current branchConrad Irwin
"git branch -M <foo> <current-branch>" allows updating the current branch which HEAD points, without the necessary house-keeping that git reset normally does to make this operation sensible. It also leaves the reflog in a confusing state (you would be warned when trying to read it). "git checkout -B <current branch> <foo>" is also partly vulnerable to this bug; due to inconsistent pre-flight checks it would perform half of its task and then abort just before rewriting the branch. Again this manifested itself as the index file getting out-of-sync with HEAD. "git branch -f" already guarded against this problem, and aborts with a fatal error. Update "git branch -M", "git checkout -B" and "git branch -f" to share the same check before allowing a branch to be created. These prevent you from updating the current branch. We considered suggesting the use of "git reset" in the failure message but concluded that it was not possible to discern what the user was actually trying to do. Signed-off-by: Conrad Irwin <conrad.irwin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-03Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C codeMatthieu Moy
(Just like we did for documentation already) In the process, we change "non-remote branch" to "branch outside the refs/remotes/ hierarchy" to avoid the ugly "non-remote-tracking branch". The new formulation actually corresponds to how the code detects this case (i.e. prefixcmp(refname, "refs/remotes")). Also, we use 'remote-tracking branch' in generated merge messages (by merge an fmt-merge-msg). Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-04Make git-clone respect branch.autosetuprebaseJunio C Hamano
When git-clone creates an initial branch it was not checking the branch.autosetuprebase configuration option (which may exist in ~/.gitconfig). Refactor the code used by "git branch" to create a new branch, and use it instead of the insufficiently duplicated code in builtin-clone. Changes are partly, and the test is mostly, based on the previous work by Pat Notz. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-20branch: optionally setup branch.*.merge from upstream local branchesJay Soffian
"git branch" and "git checkout -b" now honor --track option even when the upstream branch is local. Previously --track was silently ignored when forking from a local branch. Also the command did not error out when --track was explicitly asked for but the forked point specified was not an existing branch (i.e. when there is no way to set up the tracking configuration), but now it correctly does. The configuration setting branch.autosetupmerge can now be set to "always", which is equivalent to using --track from the command line. Setting branch.autosetupmerge to "true" will retain the former behavior of only setting up branch.*.merge for remote upstream branches. Includes test cases for the new functionality. Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-10Move code to clean up after a branch change to branch.cDaniel Barkalow
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
2008-02-10Move create_branch into a library fileDaniel Barkalow
You can also create branches, in exactly the same way, with checkout -b. This introduces branch.{c,h} library files for doing porcelain-level operations on branches (such as creating them with their appropriate default configuration). Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>