diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-rebase.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/git-rebase.txt | 94 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 70 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt index 73d49ec..a1af21f 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt @@ -79,9 +79,10 @@ remain the checked-out branch. If the upstream branch already contains a change you have made (e.g., because you mailed a patch which was applied upstream), then that commit -will be skipped. For example, running `git rebase master` on the -following history (in which `A'` and `A` introduce the same set of changes, -but have different committer information): +will be skipped and warnings will be issued (if the `merge` backend is +used). For example, running `git rebase master` on the following +history (in which `A'` and `A` introduce the same set of changes, but +have different committer information): ------------ A---B---C topic @@ -312,7 +313,10 @@ See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. By default (or if `--no-reapply-cherry-picks` is given), these commits will be automatically dropped. Because this necessitates reading all upstream commits, this can be expensive in repos with a large number -of upstream commits that need to be read. +of upstream commits that need to be read. When using the `merge` +backend, warnings will be issued for each dropped commit (unless +`--quiet` is given). Advice will also be issued unless +`advice.skippedCherryPicks` is set to false (see linkgit:git-config[1]). + `--reapply-cherry-picks` allows rebase to forgo reading all upstream commits, potentially improving performance. @@ -352,8 +356,8 @@ See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. -s <strategy>:: --strategy=<strategy>:: - Use the given merge strategy, instead of the default - `recursive`. This implies `--merge`. + Use the given merge strategy, instead of the default `ort`. + This implies `--merge`. + Because 'git rebase' replays each commit from the working branch on top of the <upstream> branch using the given strategy, using @@ -366,7 +370,7 @@ See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --strategy-option=<strategy-option>:: Pass the <strategy-option> through to the merge strategy. This implies `--merge` and, if no strategy has been - specified, `-s recursive`. Note the reversal of 'ours' and + specified, `-s ort`. Note the reversal of 'ours' and 'theirs' as noted above for the `-m` option. + See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. @@ -442,7 +446,8 @@ When --fork-point is active, 'fork_point' will be used instead of ends up being empty, the <upstream> will be used as a fallback. + If <upstream> is given on the command line, then the default is -`--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`. +`--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`. See also +`rebase.forkpoint` in linkgit:git-config[1]. + If your branch was based on <upstream> but <upstream> was rewound and your branch contains commits which were dropped, this option can be used @@ -522,29 +527,12 @@ i.e. commits that would be excluded by linkgit:git-log[1]'s the `rebase-cousins` mode is turned on, such commits are instead rebased onto `<upstream>` (or `<onto>`, if specified). + -The `--rebase-merges` mode is similar in spirit to the deprecated -`--preserve-merges` but works with interactive rebases, -where commits can be reordered, inserted and dropped at will. -+ It is currently only possible to recreate the merge commits using the -`recursive` merge strategy; different merge strategies can be used only via +`ort` merge strategy; different merge strategies can be used only via explicit `exec git merge -s <strategy> [...]` commands. + See also REBASING MERGES and INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. --p:: ---preserve-merges:: - [DEPRECATED: use `--rebase-merges` instead] Recreate merge commits - instead of flattening the history by replaying commits a merge commit - introduces. Merge conflict resolutions or manual amendments to merge - commits are not preserved. -+ -This uses the `--interactive` machinery internally, but combining it -with the `--interactive` option explicitly is generally not a good -idea unless you know what you are doing (see BUGS below). -+ -See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. - -x <cmd>:: --exec <cmd>:: Append "exec <cmd>" after each line creating a commit in the @@ -576,9 +564,6 @@ See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. the root commit(s) on a branch. When used with --onto, it will skip changes already contained in <newbase> (instead of <upstream>) whereas without --onto it will operate on every change. - When used together with both --onto and --preserve-merges, - 'all' root commits will be rewritten to have <newbase> as parent - instead. + See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below. @@ -640,7 +625,6 @@ are incompatible with the following options: * --allow-empty-message * --[no-]autosquash * --rebase-merges - * --preserve-merges * --interactive * --exec * --no-keep-empty @@ -651,13 +635,6 @@ are incompatible with the following options: In addition, the following pairs of options are incompatible: - * --preserve-merges and --interactive - * --preserve-merges and --signoff - * --preserve-merges and --rebase-merges - * --preserve-merges and --empty= - * --preserve-merges and --ignore-whitespace - * --preserve-merges and --committer-date-is-author-date - * --preserve-merges and --ignore-date * --keep-base and --onto * --keep-base and --root * --fork-point and --root @@ -1216,16 +1193,16 @@ successful merge so that the user can edit the message. If a `merge` command fails for any reason other than merge conflicts (i.e. when the merge operation did not even start), it is rescheduled immediately. -By default, the `merge` command will use the `recursive` merge -strategy for regular merges, and `octopus` for octopus merges. One -can specify a default strategy for all merges using the `--strategy` -argument when invoking rebase, or can override specific merges in the -interactive list of commands by using an `exec` command to call `git -merge` explicitly with a `--strategy` argument. Note that when -calling `git merge` explicitly like this, you can make use of the fact -that the labels are worktree-local refs (the ref `refs/rewritten/onto` -would correspond to the label `onto`, for example) in order to refer -to the branches you want to merge. +By default, the `merge` command will use the `ort` merge strategy for +regular merges, and `octopus` for octopus merges. One can specify a +default strategy for all merges using the `--strategy` argument when +invoking rebase, or can override specific merges in the interactive +list of commands by using an `exec` command to call `git merge` +explicitly with a `--strategy` argument. Note that when calling `git +merge` explicitly like this, you can make use of the fact that the +labels are worktree-local refs (the ref `refs/rewritten/onto` would +correspond to the label `onto`, for example) in order to refer to the +branches you want to merge. Note: the first command (`label onto`) labels the revision onto which the commits are rebased; The name `onto` is just a convention, as a nod @@ -1275,29 +1252,6 @@ CONFIGURATION include::config/rebase.txt[] include::config/sequencer.txt[] -BUGS ----- -The todo list presented by the deprecated `--preserve-merges --interactive` -does not represent the topology of the revision graph (use `--rebase-merges` -instead). Editing commits and rewording their commit messages should work -fine, but attempts to reorder commits tend to produce counterintuitive results. -Use `--rebase-merges` in such scenarios instead. - -For example, an attempt to rearrange ------------- -1 --- 2 --- 3 --- 4 --- 5 ------------- -to ------------- -1 --- 2 --- 4 --- 3 --- 5 ------------- -by moving the "pick 4" line will result in the following history: ------------- - 3 - / -1 --- 2 --- 4 --- 5 ------------- - GIT --- Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite |