diff options
| author | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | 2006-11-14 06:47:45 (GMT) |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> | 2006-11-24 23:42:49 (GMT) |
| commit | c6702f4b95699c6bd47337516c32e3408dda0595 (patch) | |
| tree | 3b33845a74d430c95823bc3e44fe7e49d3012bbe /upload-pack.c | |
| parent | fcd1e3190612fc59c2d820537280b5164d290d9d (diff) | |
| download | git-c6702f4b95699c6bd47337516c32e3408dda0595.zip git-c6702f4b95699c6bd47337516c32e3408dda0595.tar.gz git-c6702f4b95699c6bd47337516c32e3408dda0595.tar.bz2 | |
Why didn't we mark want_obj as ~UNINTERESTING in the old code?
Is this something we would want to do regardless of shallow clone?
Diffstat (limited to 'upload-pack.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | upload-pack.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c index 4a9d672..7e3c437 100644 --- a/upload-pack.c +++ b/upload-pack.c @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static void create_pack_file(void) } else { for (i = 0; i < want_obj.nr; i++) { struct object *o = want_obj.objects[i].item; + /* why??? */ o->flags &= ~UNINTERESTING; add_pending_object(&revs, o, NULL); } |