tempfile: handle NULL tempfile pointers gracefully

The tempfile functions all take pointers to tempfile
objects, but do not check whether the argument is NULL.
This isn't a big deal in practice, since the lifetime of any
tempfile object is defined to last for the whole program. So
even if we try to call delete_tempfile() on an
already-deleted tempfile, our "active" check will tell us
that it's a noop.

In preparation for transitioning to a new system that
loosens the "tempfile objects can never be freed" rule,
let's tighten up our active checks:

  1. A NULL pointer is now defined as "inactive" (so it will
     BUG for most functions, but works as a silent noop for
     things like delete_tempfile).

  2. Functions should always do the "active" check before
     looking at any of the struct fields.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/tempfile.c b/tempfile.c
index 964c66d..861f817 100644
--- a/tempfile.c
+++ b/tempfile.c
@@ -236,13 +236,15 @@ FILE *get_tempfile_fp(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 
 int close_tempfile_gently(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 {
-	int fd = tempfile->fd;
-	FILE *fp = tempfile->fp;
+	int fd;
+	FILE *fp;
 	int err;
 
-	if (fd < 0)
+	if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile) || tempfile->fd < 0)
 		return 0;
 
+	fd = tempfile->fd;
+	fp = tempfile->fp;
 	tempfile->fd = -1;
 	if (fp) {
 		tempfile->fp = NULL;
@@ -262,10 +264,10 @@ int close_tempfile_gently(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 
 int reopen_tempfile(struct tempfile *tempfile)
 {
-	if (0 <= tempfile->fd)
-		die("BUG: reopen_tempfile called for an open object");
 	if (!is_tempfile_active(tempfile))
 		die("BUG: reopen_tempfile called for an inactive object");
+	if (0 <= tempfile->fd)
+		die("BUG: reopen_tempfile called for an open object");
 	tempfile->fd = open(tempfile->filename.buf, O_WRONLY);
 	return tempfile->fd;
 }