replace-object: make replace operations thread-safe

replace-object functions are very close to being thread-safe: the only
current racy section is the lazy initialization at
prepare_replace_object(). The following patches will protect some object
reading operations to be called threaded, but before that, replace
functions must be protected. To do so, add a mutex to struct
raw_object_store and acquire it before lazy initializing the
replace_map. This won't cause any noticeable performance drop as the
mutex will no longer be used after the replace_map is initialized.

Later, when the replace functions are called in parallel, thread
debuggers might point our use of the added replace_map_initialized flag
as a data race. However, as this boolean variable is initialized as
false and it's only updated once, there's no real harm. It's perfectly
fine if the value is updated right after a thread read it in
replace-map.h:lookup_replace_object() (there'll only be a performance
penalty for the affected threads at that moment). We could cease the
debugger warning protecting the variable reading at the said function.
However, this would negatively affect performance for all threads
calling it, at any time, so it's not really worthy since the warning
doesn't represent a real problem. Instead, to make sure we don't get
false positives (at ThreadSanitizer, at least) an entry for the
respective function is added to .tsan-suppressions.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/replace-object.c b/replace-object.c
index e295e87..7bd9aba 100644
--- a/replace-object.c
+++ b/replace-object.c
@@ -34,14 +34,23 @@ static int register_replace_ref(struct repository *r,
 
 void prepare_replace_object(struct repository *r)
 {
-	if (r->objects->replace_map)
+	if (r->objects->replace_map_initialized)
 		return;
 
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&r->objects->replace_mutex);
+	if (r->objects->replace_map_initialized) {
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&r->objects->replace_mutex);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	r->objects->replace_map =
 		xmalloc(sizeof(*r->objects->replace_map));
 	oidmap_init(r->objects->replace_map, 0);
 
 	for_each_replace_ref(r, register_replace_ref, NULL);
+	r->objects->replace_map_initialized = 1;
+
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&r->objects->replace_mutex);
 }
 
 /* We allow "recursive" replacement. Only within reason, though */