summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/remote.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2013-09-09 21:30:29 (GMT)
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2013-09-09 21:30:29 (GMT)
commit2233ad4534db8a37b1bf726312d52d4a0a51db0a (patch)
treea13884a1de77eb61ef89f9b3f780553c6b2a3225 /remote.c
parent711b2769740637e228c8200927e96b31f2065d32 (diff)
parent05c1eb10348f159908becc7a6ed6bbcdab24c893 (diff)
downloadgit-2233ad4534db8a37b1bf726312d52d4a0a51db0a.zip
git-2233ad4534db8a37b1bf726312d52d4a0a51db0a.tar.gz
git-2233ad4534db8a37b1bf726312d52d4a0a51db0a.tar.bz2
Merge branch 'jc/push-cas'
Allow a safer "rewind of the remote tip" push than blind "--force", by requiring that the overwritten remote ref to be unchanged since the new history to replace it was prepared. The machinery is more or less ready. The "--force" option is again the big red button to override any safety, thanks to J6t's sanity (the original round allowed --lockref to defeat --force). The logic to choose the default implemented here is fragile (e.g. "git fetch" after seeing a failure will update the remote-tracking branch and will make the next "push" pass, defeating the safety pretty easily). It is suitable only for the simplest workflows, and it may hurt users more than it helps them. * jc/push-cas: push: teach --force-with-lease to smart-http transport send-pack: fix parsing of --force-with-lease option t5540/5541: smart-http does not support "--force-with-lease" t5533: test "push --force-with-lease" push --force-with-lease: tie it all together push --force-with-lease: implement logic to populate old_sha1_expect[] remote.c: add command line option parser for "--force-with-lease" builtin/push.c: use OPT_BOOL, not OPT_BOOLEAN cache.h: move remote/connect API out of it
Diffstat (limited to 'remote.c')
-rw-r--r--remote.c175
1 files changed, 162 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index 8f0f2dd..2433467 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -1305,6 +1305,14 @@ static void add_missing_tags(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst, struct ref ***ds
free(sent_tips.tip);
}
+struct ref *find_ref_by_name(const struct ref *list, const char *name)
+{
+ for ( ; list; list = list->next)
+ if (!strcmp(list->name, name))
+ return (struct ref *)list;
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static void prepare_ref_index(struct string_list *ref_index, struct ref *ref)
{
for ( ; ref; ref = ref->next)
@@ -1414,12 +1422,13 @@ int match_push_refs(struct ref *src, struct ref **dst,
}
void set_ref_status_for_push(struct ref *remote_refs, int send_mirror,
- int force_update)
+ int force_update)
{
struct ref *ref;
for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next) {
int force_ref_update = ref->force || force_update;
+ int reject_reason = 0;
if (ref->peer_ref)
hashcpy(ref->new_sha1, ref->peer_ref->new_sha1);
@@ -1434,6 +1443,26 @@ void set_ref_status_for_push(struct ref *remote_refs, int send_mirror,
}
/*
+ * Bypass the usual "must fast-forward" check but
+ * replace it with a weaker "the old value must be
+ * this value we observed". If the remote ref has
+ * moved and is now different from what we expect,
+ * reject any push.
+ *
+ * It also is an error if the user told us to check
+ * with the remote-tracking branch to find the value
+ * to expect, but we did not have such a tracking
+ * branch.
+ */
+ if (ref->expect_old_sha1) {
+ if (ref->expect_old_no_trackback ||
+ hashcmp(ref->old_sha1, ref->old_sha1_expect))
+ reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_STALE;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * The usual "must fast-forward" rules.
+ *
* Decide whether an individual refspec A:B can be
* pushed. The push will succeed if any of the
* following are true:
@@ -1451,24 +1480,26 @@ void set_ref_status_for_push(struct ref *remote_refs, int send_mirror,
* passing the --force argument
*/
- if (!ref->deletion && !is_null_sha1(ref->old_sha1)) {
- int why = 0; /* why would this push require --force? */
-
+ else if (!ref->deletion && !is_null_sha1(ref->old_sha1)) {
if (!prefixcmp(ref->name, "refs/tags/"))
- why = REF_STATUS_REJECT_ALREADY_EXISTS;
+ reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_ALREADY_EXISTS;
else if (!has_sha1_file(ref->old_sha1))
- why = REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST;
+ reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST;
else if (!lookup_commit_reference_gently(ref->old_sha1, 1) ||
!lookup_commit_reference_gently(ref->new_sha1, 1))
- why = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE;
+ reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE;
else if (!ref_newer(ref->new_sha1, ref->old_sha1))
- why = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NONFASTFORWARD;
-
- if (!force_ref_update)
- ref->status = why;
- else if (why)
- ref->forced_update = 1;
+ reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_NONFASTFORWARD;
}
+
+ /*
+ * "--force" will defeat any rejection implemented
+ * by the rules above.
+ */
+ if (!force_ref_update)
+ ref->status = reject_reason;
+ else if (reject_reason)
+ ref->forced_update = 1;
}
}
@@ -1939,3 +1970,121 @@ struct ref *get_stale_heads(struct refspec *refs, int ref_count, struct ref *fet
string_list_clear(&ref_names, 0);
return stale_refs;
}
+
+/*
+ * Compare-and-swap
+ */
+void clear_cas_option(struct push_cas_option *cas)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cas->nr; i++)
+ free(cas->entry[i].refname);
+ free(cas->entry);
+ memset(cas, 0, sizeof(*cas));
+}
+
+static struct push_cas *add_cas_entry(struct push_cas_option *cas,
+ const char *refname,
+ size_t refnamelen)
+{
+ struct push_cas *entry;
+ ALLOC_GROW(cas->entry, cas->nr + 1, cas->alloc);
+ entry = &cas->entry[cas->nr++];
+ memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry));
+ entry->refname = xmemdupz(refname, refnamelen);
+ return entry;
+}
+
+int parse_push_cas_option(struct push_cas_option *cas, const char *arg, int unset)
+{
+ const char *colon;
+ struct push_cas *entry;
+
+ if (unset) {
+ /* "--no-<option>" */
+ clear_cas_option(cas);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!arg) {
+ /* just "--<option>" */
+ cas->use_tracking_for_rest = 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* "--<option>=refname" or "--<option>=refname:value" */
+ colon = strchrnul(arg, ':');
+ entry = add_cas_entry(cas, arg, colon - arg);
+ if (!*colon)
+ entry->use_tracking = 1;
+ else if (get_sha1(colon + 1, entry->expect))
+ return error("cannot parse expected object name '%s'", colon + 1);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int parseopt_push_cas_option(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
+{
+ return parse_push_cas_option(opt->value, arg, unset);
+}
+
+int is_empty_cas(const struct push_cas_option *cas)
+{
+ return !cas->use_tracking_for_rest && !cas->nr;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Look at remote.fetch refspec and see if we have a remote
+ * tracking branch for the refname there. Fill its current
+ * value in sha1[].
+ * If we cannot do so, return negative to signal an error.
+ */
+static int remote_tracking(struct remote *remote, const char *refname,
+ unsigned char sha1[20])
+{
+ char *dst;
+
+ dst = apply_refspecs(remote->fetch, remote->fetch_refspec_nr, refname);
+ if (!dst)
+ return -1; /* no tracking ref for refname at remote */
+ if (read_ref(dst, sha1))
+ return -1; /* we know what the tracking ref is but we cannot read it */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void apply_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
+ struct remote *remote,
+ struct ref *ref)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ /* Find an explicit --<option>=<name>[:<value>] entry */
+ for (i = 0; i < cas->nr; i++) {
+ struct push_cas *entry = &cas->entry[i];
+ if (!refname_match(entry->refname, ref->name, ref_rev_parse_rules))
+ continue;
+ ref->expect_old_sha1 = 1;
+ if (!entry->use_tracking)
+ hashcpy(ref->old_sha1_expect, cas->entry[i].expect);
+ else if (remote_tracking(remote, ref->name, ref->old_sha1_expect))
+ ref->expect_old_no_trackback = 1;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Are we using "--<option>" to cover all? */
+ if (!cas->use_tracking_for_rest)
+ return;
+
+ ref->expect_old_sha1 = 1;
+ if (remote_tracking(remote, ref->name, ref->old_sha1_expect))
+ ref->expect_old_no_trackback = 1;
+}
+
+void apply_push_cas(struct push_cas_option *cas,
+ struct remote *remote,
+ struct ref *remote_refs)
+{
+ struct ref *ref;
+ for (ref = remote_refs; ref; ref = ref->next)
+ apply_cas(cas, remote, ref);
+}