summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/merge-recursive.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorElijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>2011-08-12 05:20:27 (GMT)
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2011-08-14 21:19:40 (GMT)
commit35a74abff32c32c455a74974130ad2af7d81dfd9 (patch)
tree2e48ff97b04f0170aaf6a08240fff9628b39ef60 /merge-recursive.c
parent3e333a6146ce6565de357e48e439bb94c622d3fe (diff)
downloadgit-35a74abff32c32c455a74974130ad2af7d81dfd9.zip
git-35a74abff32c32c455a74974130ad2af7d81dfd9.tar.gz
git-35a74abff32c32c455a74974130ad2af7d81dfd9.tar.bz2
merge-recursive: Avoid unnecessary file rewrites
Often times, a potential conflict at a path is resolved by merge-recursive by using the content that was already present at that location. In such cases, we do not want to overwrite the content that is already present, as that could trigger unnecessary recompilations. One of the patches earlier in this series ("merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it") fixed the cases that involved content merges, but there were a few other cases as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'merge-recursive.c')
-rw-r--r--merge-recursive.c30
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index 2bebc97..71febe9 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -1036,7 +1036,14 @@ static void handle_change_delete(struct merge_options *o,
change_past, o->branch1, o->branch1, path,
NULL == renamed ? "" : " at ",
NULL == renamed ? "" : renamed);
- update_file(o, 0, a_sha, a_mode, renamed ? renamed : path);
+ if (renamed)
+ update_file(o, 0, a_sha, a_mode, renamed);
+ /*
+ * No need to call update_file() on path when !renamed, since
+ * that would needlessly touch path. We could call
+ * update_file_flags() with update_cache=0 and update_wd=0,
+ * but that's a no-op.
+ */
}
free(renamed);
}
@@ -1396,10 +1403,20 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
NULL);
} else if ((dst_other.mode == ren1->pair->two->mode) &&
sha_eq(dst_other.sha1, ren1->pair->two->sha1)) {
- /* Added file on the other side
- identical to the file being
- renamed: clean merge */
- update_file(o, 1, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, ren1_dst);
+ /*
+ * Added file on the other side identical to
+ * the file being renamed: clean merge.
+ * Also, there is no need to overwrite the
+ * file already in the working copy, so call
+ * update_file_flags() instead of
+ * update_file().
+ */
+ update_file_flags(o,
+ ren1->pair->two->sha1,
+ ren1->pair->two->mode,
+ ren1_dst,
+ 1, /* update_cache */
+ 0 /* update_wd */);
} else if (!sha_eq(dst_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
clean_merge = 0;
try_merge = 1;
@@ -1727,7 +1744,8 @@ static int process_entry(struct merge_options *o,
free(new_path);
} else {
output(o, 2, "Adding %s", path);
- update_file(o, 1, sha, mode, path);
+ /* do not overwrite file if already present */
+ update_file_flags(o, sha, mode, path, 1, !a_sha);
}
} else if (a_sha && b_sha) {
/* Case C: Added in both (check for same permissions) and */