summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDenton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>2019-08-27 05:38:06 (GMT)
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2019-08-27 22:33:40 (GMT)
commit414d924beb41b9f39744b5574231856d5ffbcba8 (patch)
treebef31a40a2bdbbc98fa2dd9e6bf7f336d260829a /Documentation/git-rebase.txt
parent6330209d7d34f72e2e1511f7e42e267b926ff64d (diff)
downloadgit-414d924beb41b9f39744b5574231856d5ffbcba8.zip
git-414d924beb41b9f39744b5574231856d5ffbcba8.tar.gz
git-414d924beb41b9f39744b5574231856d5ffbcba8.tar.bz2
rebase: teach rebase --keep-base
A common scenario is if a user is working on a topic branch and they wish to make some changes to intermediate commits or autosquash, they would run something such as git rebase -i --onto master... master in order to preserve the merge base. This is useful when contributing a patch series to the Git mailing list, one often starts on top of the current 'master'. While developing the patches, 'master' is also developed further and it is sometimes not the best idea to keep rebasing on top of 'master', but to keep the base commit as-is. In addition to this, a user wishing to test individual commits in a topic branch without changing anything may run git rebase -x ./test.sh master... master Since rebasing onto the merge base of the branch and the upstream is such a common case, introduce the --keep-base option as a shortcut. This allows us to rewrite the above as git rebase -i --keep-base master and git rebase -x ./test.sh --keep-base master respectively. Add tests to ensure --keep-base works correctly in the normal case and fails when there are multiple merge bases, both in regular and interactive mode. Also, test to make sure conflicting options cause rebase to fail. While we're adding test cases, add a missing set_fake_editor call to 'rebase -i --onto master...side'. While we're documenting the --keep-base option, change an instance of "merge-base" to "merge base", which is the consistent spelling. Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/git-rebase.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/git-rebase.txt30
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
index 6156609..3146c15 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ git-rebase - Reapply commits on top of another base tip
SYNOPSIS
--------
[verse]
-'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [<options>] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>]
- [<upstream> [<branch>]]
+'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [<options>] [--exec <cmd>]
+ [--onto <newbase> | --keep-base] [<upstream> [<branch>]]
'git rebase' [-i | --interactive] [<options>] [--exec <cmd>] [--onto <newbase>]
--root [<branch>]
'git rebase' (--continue | --skip | --abort | --quit | --edit-todo | --show-current-patch)
@@ -217,6 +217,24 @@ As a special case, you may use "A\...B" as a shortcut for the
merge base of A and B if there is exactly one merge base. You can
leave out at most one of A and B, in which case it defaults to HEAD.
+--keep-base::
+ Set the starting point at which to create the new commits to the
+ merge base of <upstream> <branch>. Running
+ 'git rebase --keep-base <upstream> <branch>' is equivalent to
+ running 'git rebase --onto <upstream>... <upstream>'.
++
+This option is useful in the case where one is developing a feature on
+top of an upstream branch. While the feature is being worked on, the
+upstream branch may advance and it may not be the best idea to keep
+rebasing on top of the upstream but to keep the base commit as-is.
++
+Although both this option and --fork-point find the merge base between
+<upstream> and <branch>, this option uses the merge base as the _starting
+point_ on which new commits will be created, whereas --fork-point uses
+the merge base to determine the _set of commits_ which will be rebased.
++
+See also INCOMPATIBLE OPTIONS below.
+
<upstream>::
Upstream branch to compare against. May be any valid commit,
not just an existing branch name. Defaults to the configured
@@ -369,6 +387,10 @@ ends up being empty, the <upstream> will be used as a fallback.
+
If either <upstream> or --root is given on the command line, then the
default is `--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`.
++
+If your branch was based on <upstream> but <upstream> was rewound and
+your branch contains commits which were dropped, this option can be used
+with `--keep-base` in order to drop those commits from your branch.
--ignore-whitespace::
--whitespace=<option>::
@@ -545,6 +567,8 @@ In addition, the following pairs of options are incompatible:
* --preserve-merges and --rebase-merges
* --rebase-merges and --strategy
* --rebase-merges and --strategy-option
+ * --keep-base and --onto
+ * --keep-base and --root
BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENCES
-----------------------
@@ -870,7 +894,7 @@ NOTE: While an "easy case recovery" sometimes appears to be successful
--interactive` will be **resurrected**!
The idea is to manually tell 'git rebase' "where the old 'subsystem'
-ended and your 'topic' began", that is, what the old merge-base
+ended and your 'topic' began", that is, what the old merge base
between them was. You will have to find a way to name the last commit
of the old 'subsystem', for example: