summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>2008-08-22 03:52:29 (GMT)
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2008-08-28 01:08:06 (GMT)
commitc9c4e2d5a25bbf637780f9b83e74c2a26fb957f5 (patch)
tree80b517a411a022eda5fdc20c47d864548c89f658
parentf821d0892173e4e46a71fef4d06995f7a81c9296 (diff)
downloadgit-c9c4e2d5a25bbf637780f9b83e74c2a26fb957f5.zip
git-c9c4e2d5a25bbf637780f9b83e74c2a26fb957f5.tar.gz
git-c9c4e2d5a25bbf637780f9b83e74c2a26fb957f5.tar.bz2
bisect: only check merge bases when needed
When one good revision is not an ancestor of the bad revision, the merge bases between the good and the bad revision should be checked to make sure that they are also good revisions. A previous patch takes care of that, but it may check the merge bases more often than really needed. In fact the previous patch did not try to optimize this as much as possible because it is not so simple. So this is the purpose of this patch. One may think that when all the merge bases have been checked then we can save a flag, so that we don't need to check the merge bases again during the bisect process. The problem is that the user may choose to checkout and test something completely different from what the bisect process suggested. In this case we have to check the merge bases again, because there may be new merge bases relevant to the bisect process. That's why, in this patch, when we detect that the user tested something else than what the bisect process suggested, we remove the flag that says that we don't need to check the merge bases again. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
-rwxr-xr-xgit-bisect.sh48
-rwxr-xr-xt/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh24
2 files changed, 58 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index b314d47..69a9a56 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -172,6 +172,25 @@ bisect_write() {
test -n "$nolog" || echo "git bisect $state $rev" >>"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG"
}
+is_expected_rev() {
+ test -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV" &&
+ test "$1" = $(cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV")
+}
+
+mark_expected_rev() {
+ echo "$1" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV"
+}
+
+check_expected_revs() {
+ for _rev in "$@"; do
+ if ! is_expected_rev "$_rev"; then
+ rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK"
+ rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV"
+ return
+ fi
+ done
+}
+
bisect_state() {
bisect_autostart
state=$1
@@ -181,7 +200,8 @@ bisect_state() {
1,bad|1,good|1,skip)
rev=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) ||
die "Bad rev input: HEAD"
- bisect_write "$state" "$rev" ;;
+ bisect_write "$state" "$rev"
+ check_expected_revs "$rev" ;;
2,bad|*,good|*,skip)
shift
eval=''
@@ -191,7 +211,8 @@ bisect_state() {
die "Bad rev input: $rev"
eval="$eval bisect_write '$state' '$sha'; "
done
- eval "$eval" ;;
+ eval "$eval"
+ check_expected_revs "$@" ;;
*,bad)
die "'git bisect bad' can take only one argument." ;;
*)
@@ -321,6 +342,7 @@ bisect_checkout() {
_rev="$1"
_msg="$2"
echo "Bisecting: $_msg"
+ mark_expected_rev "$_rev"
git checkout -q "$_rev" || exit
git show-branch "$_rev"
}
@@ -332,18 +354,10 @@ is_among() {
return 1
}
-is_testing_merge_base() {
- grep "^testing $1$" "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MERGE_BASES" >/dev/null 2>&1
-}
-
-mark_testing_merge_base() {
- echo "testing $1" >> "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MERGE_BASES"
-}
-
handle_bad_merge_base() {
_badmb="$1"
_good="$2"
- if is_testing_merge_base "$_badmb"; then
+ if is_expected_rev "$_badmb"; then
cat >&2 <<EOF
The merge base $_badmb is bad.
This means the bug has been fixed between $_badmb and [$_good].
@@ -383,7 +397,6 @@ check_merge_bases() {
elif is_among "$_mb" "$_skip"; then
handle_skipped_merge_base "$_mb" "$_bad" "$_good"
else
- mark_testing_merge_base "$_mb"
bisect_checkout "$_mb" "a merge base must be tested"
checkout_done=1
return
@@ -392,6 +405,9 @@ check_merge_bases() {
}
check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad() {
+ test -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
+ return
+
_bad="$1"
_good=$(echo $2 | sed -e 's/\^//g')
_skip="$3"
@@ -401,8 +417,11 @@ check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad() {
_side=$(git rev-list $_good ^$_bad)
if test -n "$_side"; then
- check_merge_bases "$_bad" "$_good" "$_skip"
+ check_merge_bases "$_bad" "$_good" "$_skip" || return
+ test "$checkout_done" -eq "1" && return
fi
+
+ : > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK"
}
bisect_next() {
@@ -491,7 +510,8 @@ bisect_clean_state() {
do
git update-ref -d $ref $hash || exit
done
- rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MERGE_BASES" &&
+ rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_EXPECTED_REV" &&
+ rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" &&
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" &&
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" &&
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index a1ce95c..c163114 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -440,6 +440,30 @@ test_expect_success 'good merge bases when good and bad are siblings' '
git bisect reset
'
+check_trace() {
+ grep "$1" "$GIT_TRACE" | grep "\^$2" | grep "$3" >/dev/null
+}
+
+test_expect_success 'optimized merge base checks' '
+ GIT_TRACE="$(pwd)/trace.log" &&
+ export GIT_TRACE &&
+ git bisect start "$HASH7" "$SIDE_HASH7" > my_bisect_log.txt &&
+ grep "merge base must be tested" my_bisect_log.txt &&
+ grep "$HASH4" my_bisect_log.txt &&
+ check_trace "rev-list" "$HASH7" "$SIDE_HASH7" &&
+ git bisect good > my_bisect_log2.txt &&
+ test -f ".git/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
+ test "$HASH6" = $(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
+ : > "$GIT_TRACE" &&
+ git bisect bad > my_bisect_log3.txt &&
+ test_must_fail check_trace "rev-list" "$HASH6" "$SIDE_HASH7" &&
+ git bisect good "$A_HASH" > my_bisect_log4.txt &&
+ grep "merge base must be tested" my_bisect_log4.txt &&
+ test_must_fail test -f ".git/BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK" &&
+ check_trace "rev-list" "$HASH6" "$A_HASH" &&
+ unset GIT_TRACE
+'
+
#
#
test_done